Abstract
Background
The Fellowship Council (FC) is a robust accreditation body with numerous fellowships; however, no specific criteria exist for hernia fellowships. This study analyzed the case log database to evaluate trends in fellowship exposure to hernia repairs.
Methods
FC hernia case log records (2007–2019) were coded as inguinal or ventral hernias and with or without mesh repair. Retrospective analysis examined total hernia repairs logged, type of repair, program designation, and robotic adoption. Robotic adoption was categorized by quartiles of program performance according to the final year of analysis (2018–2019); yearly performance was then graphed by quartiles.
Results
Over this twelve-year period, 93,334 hernia repairs, 5 program designations, 152 unique programs and 1,558 unique fellows were analyzed. The number of fellows grew from 106 (2007–2008) to > 130 (2018–2019). Total hernias repairs per fellow increased from an average of 41.2 in 2007–2008 to 75.7 in 2018–2019 (183.7%). Open and robotic hernia repairs increased by 241.9% and 266.3%, respectively; laparoscopic hernia repairs decreased by 14.8%. Inguinal and ventral hernia repairs comprised 48.1% and 51.9% of total cases, respectively.
Advanced GI/MIS and Advanced GI/MIS/Bariatrics programs logged the majority of hernia repairs (86.0–90.2%). 2014 began an exponential rise in robotic adoption, with fellows averaging < 1 robotic repairs before and > 25 repairs in 2019. A significant difference was found between all groups when comparing quartiles of robotic adopters (median robotic repairs per fellow; IQR): first quartile (72.0; 47.9–108.8), second quartile (25.5; 21.0–30.6), third quartile (13.0; 12.0–14.3) and fourth quartile (3.5; 0.5–5.0) (p-value < 0.05).
Conclusions
This twelve-year analysis shows a near doubling in the growth of total hernia repairs, with a decrease in laparoscopic repairs as robotic repairs increased. These data show the importance of hernia repairs in FC fellows’ training and warrant further granular analysis to determine specific accreditation criteria for hernia fellowship designations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Series 13 - Data on Health Resources Utilization. Retrieved December 17, 2022, from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/series/series13.htm
Everhart JE (2008) The burden of digestive diseases in the United States. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases: 93–96.
Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, Crockett SD, McGowan CE, Bulsiewicz WJ, Gangarosa LM, Thiny MT, Stizenberg K, Morgan DR, Ringel W, Kim HP, DiBonaventura MD, Carroll CF, Allen JK, Cook SF, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD, Shaheen NJ (2012) Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 143(5):1179-1187.e3
Rutkow IM (1998) Epidemiologic, economic, and sociologic aspects of hernia surgery in the United States in the 1990s. Surg Clin North Am 78(6):941–951
Köckerling F, Sheen AJ, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Cuccurullo D, Fortelny R, Friis-Andersen H, Gillion JF, Gorjanc J, Kopelman D, Lopez-Cano M, Morales-Conde S, Österberg J, Reinpold W, Simmermacher RKJ, Smietanski M, Weyhe D, Simons MP (2019) The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 23(6):1081–1091
Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 Investigators (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350(18):1819–1827
Tam V, Rogers DE, Al-Abbas A, Borrebach J, Dunn SA, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ 3rd, Hogg ME (2019) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: a large health system’s experience with the first 300 cases and review of the literature. J Surg Res 235:98–104
Huffman EM, Rosen SA, Levy JS, Martino MA, Stefanidis D (2021) Are current credentialing requirements for robotic surgery adequate to ensure surgeon proficiency? Surg Endosc 35(5):2104–2109
Poulose BK, Adrales GL, Janis JE (2020) Abdominal Core health—a needed field in surgery. JAMA Surg 155(3):185–186. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5055
Borman K, Vick L, Biester T, Mitchell M (2008) Changing demographics of residents choosing fellowships: longterm data from the American board of surgery. J Am Coll Surg 206(5):782–788
Lewis FR, Klingensmith ME (2012) Issues in general surgery residency training-2012. Ann Surg 256(4):553–559
George BC, Bohnen JD, Williams RG, Meyerson SL, Schuller MC, Clark MJ, Meier AH, Torbeck L, Mandell SP, Mullen JT, Smink DS, Scully RE, Chipman JG, Auyang ED, Terhune KP, Wise PE, Choi JN, Foley EF, Dimick JB, Choti MA, Soper NJ, Lillemoe KD, Zwischenberger JB, Dunnington GL, DaRosa DA, Fryer JP, Learning P, Collaborative S, (PLSC), (2017) Readiness of US general surgery residents for independent practice. Ann Surg 266(4):582–594
Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, Jeyarajah DR, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, Wexner SD, Martinez JM, Ross SB, Awad MM, Franklin ME, Arregui ME, Schirmer BD, Minter RM (2013) General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg 258(3):440–449
Leung B, Knee A, Wu J, Fernandez G, Seymour NE, Al-Mansour MR (2020) Senior general surgery resident confidence in performing abdominal wall hernia repairs. J Surg Res 252:174–182
Fowler DL, Hogle NJ (2013) The fellowship council: a decade of impact on surgical training. Surg Endosc 27(10):3548–3554
The Fellowship Council. Matching Process Statistics [Internet]. Los Angeles (CA): BSC Management, Inc. [cited]. https://www.fellowshipcouncil.org/fellowship-programs/matching-process-statistics/ Accessed on 20 Sep 2021
Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16(2):179–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9
Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200008103430603
Pawlak M, Tulloh B, de Beaux A (2020) Current trends in hernia surgery in NHS England. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 102(1):25–27. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2019.0118
Lockhart K, Dunn D, Teo S, Ng JY, Dhillon M, Teo E, van Driel ML (2018) Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9(9):CD011517. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2
Kadakia N, Malek K, Lee SK, Lee EJ, Burruss S, Srikureja D, Mukherjee K, Lum SS (2020) Impact of robotic surgery on residency training for herniorrhaphy and cholecystectomy. Am Surg 86(10):1318–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820964430
The Fellowship Council. Directory of Fellowships [Internet]. Available at: https://www.fellowshipcouncil.org/directory-of-fellowships/?match=1. Accessed on 17 July 2021.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Fellowship Council and supporting institutions for their support and collaboration. Additionally, the authors would like to thank the fellows and programs whose hernia experiences contributed to this work. This manuscript has been reviewed and approved by the FC well as the AHS and SAGES (including the SAGES Community Practice Committee).
Funding
There was no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Dr. Ajita S. Prabhu is a consultant for Verb Surgical and CMR Surgical, as well as a speaker and research support for Intuitive Surgical. Drs. Madhuri B. Nagaraj, Adnan Alseidi, Jacob A. Greenberg, Michael M. Awad, Joshua J. Weis, and Daniel J. Scott have have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nagaraj, M.B., Alseidi, A., Prabhu, A.S. et al. The case for a new post-graduate hernia designation: a review of fellowship council case logs from the past twelve-years. Surg Endosc 37, 3430–3438 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09800-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09800-y