Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to quantify Fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green (ICG) in colorectal cancer anastomosis, determine influential factors in its temporary intensity and pattern, assessing the ability to predict the AL, and setting the cut-off levels to establish high- or low-risk groups.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of prospectively managed database, including 70 patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal cancer in which performing a primary anastomosis was in primary plan. In all of them, ICG fluorescence angiography was performed as usual clinical practice with VisionSense™ VS Iridium (Medtronic, Mansfield, MA, USA), in Elevision™ IR Platform (Medtronic, Mansfield, MA, USA). Parameters measured at real time or calculated were T0, Tmax, ∆T, Fmax, %pos, Fpos, and Slope.
Results
70 patients were included, 69 anastomosis were performed and one end colostomy. Arterial hypertension demonstrated higher Fmax, as well as the location of the anastomosis (the nearest to rectum, the most intensity detected). A statistical relationship was found between AL and the lower Fpos and Slope. The decision of changing the subjectively decided point of division did not demonstrate statistical difference on the further development of AL. All parameters were analyzed to detect the cut-off related with AL. Only in case of Fpos lower than 158.3 U and Slope lower than 13.1 U/s p-value were significant. The most valuable diagnostic parameter after risk stratification was the Negative Predictive Value.
Conclusion
Quantitative analysis of ICG fluorescence in colorectal surgery is safe and feasible to stratify risk of AL. Hypertension and location of anastomosis influence the intensity of fluorescence at the point of section. A change of division place should be considered to avoid AL related to vascular reasons when intensities of fluorescence at the point of section is lower than 169 U or slopes lower than 14.4 U/s.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
08 February 2022
This article was updated to correct the sentence in the Discussion section which now reads “As observed in our experience, in 16(23.2%) patients…” (rather than “As observed in our experience, in 8(11.5%) patients…”).
09 February 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09085-1
References
Govaert JA, Fiocco M, Dijk WA van, Scheffer AC, Graaf EJR de, Tollenaar RAEM, Wouters MWJM, Group DVBHS, Lamme B, Hess DA, Belgers HJ, Guicherit OR, Rosman C, Rutten HJT, Versluijs-Ossewaarde FNL, Zaag ESV der, Tseng LNL, Vles WJ, Pierik EGJM, Prins HA, Reemst PHM, Consten ECJ, Koopal SA, Neijenhuis PA, Mannaerts GHH, Smits AB, Burger DHC, IJken MGA van, Poortman P, Govaert MJPM, Bleeker WA, Boer FCD, Wit F, Kruyt PM, Mearadji A, Heikens JT (2015) Costs of complications after colorectal cancer surgery in the Netherlands: building the business case for hospitals. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.236
Gomez-Rosado J-C, Salas-Turrens J, Olry-de-Labry-Lima A (2018) Análisis de los costes económicos asociados a las complicaciones en cirugía general y digestiva. Cir Esp 96:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.02.011
Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodríguez JLR, Granero-Castro P, Hervás D, Rico MAA, Brao MJG, González JMS, Granero EG (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer. Ann Surg 262:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000973
McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102:462–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9697
Shogan BD, Carlisle EM, Alverdy JC, Umanskiy K (2013) Do we really know why colorectal anastomoses leak? J Gastrointest Surg 17:1698–1707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2227-0
Goto S, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Uozumi R, Kanemitsu Y, Watanabe T, Sugihara K, Sakai Y, Rectum SG for N of the JS for C of the C and (2017) Multicenter analysis of impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term oncologic outcomes after curative resection of colon cancer. Surgery 162:317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.005
Frye J, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Sinclair G, Dent OF (2009) Anastomotic leakage after resection of colorectal cancer generates prodigious use of hospital resources. Colorectal Dis 11:917–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01728.x
Hammond J, Lim S, Wan Y, Gao X, Patkar A (2014) The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1176–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2506-4
Ashraf SQ, Burns EM, Jani A, Altman S, Young JD, Cunningham C, Faiz O, Mortensen NJ (2013) The economic impact of anastomotic leakage after anterior resections in English NHS hospitals: are we adequately remunerating them? Colorectal Dis 15:e190–e198. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12125
Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H (2006) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg 202:439–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.10.019
Trancar AAYPD (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26:499–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0256-4
Wada T (2017) ICG fluorescence imaging for quantitative evaluation of colonic perfusion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 31:4184–4193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5475-3
Boni L, David G, Dionigi G, Rausei S, Cassinotti E, Fingerhut A (2015) Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence to assess bowel perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 30:2736–2742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4540-z
Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ, Wiggers T, Baas PC, van Dam GM (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:569–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0658-6
Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I, Horstmann O, Brinker J, Becker H (2005) Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 92:101–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4608
Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE, McLemore EC, Margolin DA, Sherwinter DA, Lee SW, Senagore AJ, Phelan MJ, Stamos MJ (2015) Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 220:82-92.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.09.015
Luo S, Zhang E, Su Y, Cheng T, Shi C (2011) A review of NIR dyes in cancer targeting and imaging. Biomaterials 32:7127–7138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.024
Morales-Conde S, Alarcón I, Yang T, Licardie E, Camacho V, del Castillo FA, Balla A (2019) Fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green (ICG) to evaluate anastomosis in colorectal surgery: where does it have more value? Surg Endosc 34:3897–3907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07159-1
Kin C, Vo H, Welton L, Welton M (2015) Equivocal effect of intraoperative fluorescence angiography on colorectal anastomotic leaks. Dis Colon Rectum 58:582–587. https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000320
Son GM (2019) Quantitative analysis of colon perfusion pattern using indocyanine green (ICG) angiography in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 33:1640–1649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6439-y
Iwamoto H, Matsuda K, Hayami S, Tamura K, Mitani Y, Mizumoto Y, Nakamura Y, Murakami D, Ueno M, Yokoyama S, Hotta T, Takifuji K, Yamaue H (2020) Quantitative indocyanine green fluorescence imaging used to predict anastomotic leakage focused on rectal stump during laparoscopic anterior resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 30:542–546. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0788
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, Rockall TA, Young-Fadok TM, Hill AG, Soop M, de Boer HD, Urman RD, Chang GJ, Fichera A, Kessler H, Grass F, Whang EE, Fawcett WJ, Carli F, Lobo DN, Rollins KE, Balfour A, Baldini G, Riedel B, Ljungqvist O (2018) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 43:659–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y
Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012
Blanco-Colino R, Espin-Basany E (2018) Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 22:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1731-8
Group AS, Frasson M, Granero-Castro P, Rodríguez JLR, Flor-Lorente B, Braithwaite M, Martínez EM, Pérez JAÁ, Cazador AC, Espi A, Granero EG (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2376-6
van Tonder JJ, Boon JM, Becker JHR, van Schoor A-N (2007) Anatomical considerations on Sudeck’s critical point and its relevance to colorectal surgery. Clin Anat 20:424–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20417
Park S-H, Park H-M, Baek K-R, Ahn H-M, Lee IY, Son GM (2020) Artificial intelligence based real-time microcirculation analysis system for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 26:6945–6962. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i44.6945
Funding
This work has not received funding for its realization or for its publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Juan-Carlos Gomez-Rosado, Javier Valdes-Hernandez, Juan Cintas-Catena, Auxiliadora Cano-Matias, Asuncion Perez-Sanchez, Francisco-Javier del Rio-Lafuente, Cristina Torres-Arcos, Yaiza Lara-Fernandez, Luis-Cristobal Capitan-Morales, and Fernando Oliva-Mompean declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to the published content.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gomez-Rosado, JC., Valdes-Hernandez, J., Cintas-Catena, J. et al. Feasibility of quantitative analysis of colonic perfusion using indocyanine green to prevent anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 36, 1688–1695 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08918-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08918-9