Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy approach of a radical resection for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic approach for gallbladder cancer (GBC) has long been contraindicated, but few recent studies have demonstrated the oncologic outcomes of this treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival for laparoscopic surgery versus traditional open surgery of GBC.

Method

Between January 2014 and December 2018, 63 GBC patients who received radical resection were enrolled in this study, with 32 patients in laparoscopic group and 31 cases in laparotomy group. Perioperative data and postoperative survival were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

Laparoscopic approach was associated with less intraoperative bleeding (267.20 ± 47.07 vs. 502.60 ± 69.70, P = 0.007), fewer postoperative days of oral diet recovery (2.34 ± 0.31 vs. 3.32 ± 0.35, P = 0.041), and hospital stay (11.03 ± 0.99 vs. 14.35 ± 1.11, P = 0.028). There were no significant differences between two groups regarding other perioperative outcomes. Patients in laparoscopic group showed better 1-year overall survival than those in laparotomy group (72.91% vs. 47.82%, P = 0.086). Subgroup analysis for GBC patients in T3 stages revealed that laparoscopic approach was associated with less intraoperative bleeding (268.00 ± 57.19 vs. 541.50 ± 101.30, P = 0.009), fewer postoperative days of hospital stay (9.87 ± 1.10 vs. 14.90 ± 1.53, P = 0.017), and improved 1-year overall survival (P = 0.023). Subgroup analysis for GBCs in TNM III and TNM IV stages showed comparable intraoperative parameters and postoperative survival between two groups.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery for GBCs may offer the comparable perioperative outcomes as conventional laparotomy procedure, and tend to be associated with less intraoperative bleeding, faster oral diet recovery, shorter hospital stay, and improved 1-year overall survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hundal R, Shaffer EA (2014) Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and outcome. Clin Epidemiol 6:99–109

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dixon E, Vollmer CM Jr, Sahajpal A, Cattral M, Grant D, Doig C, Hemming A, Taylor B, Langer B, Greig P, Gallinger S (2005) An aggressive surgical approach leads to improved survival in patients with gallbladder cancer: a 12-year study at a North American Center. Ann Surg 241:385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim YW, Yoon HM, Yun YH, Nam BH, Eom BW, Baik YH, Lee SE, Lee Y, Kim YA, Park JY, Ryu KW (2013) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: result of a randomized controlled trial (COACT 0301). Surg Endosc 27:4267–4276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaneko H, Takagi S, Otsuka Y, Tsuchiya M, Tamura A, Katagiri T, Maeda T, Shiba T (2005) Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg 189:190–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reddy YP, Sheridan WG (2000) Port-site metastasis following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of the literature and a case report. Eur J Surg Oncol 26:95–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger-Richardson D, Chesney TR, Englesakis M, Govindarajan A, Cleary SP, Swallow CJ (2017) Trends in port-site metastasis after laparoscopic resection of incidental gallbladder cancer: a systematic review. Surgery 161:618–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Ahn KS, Kim YH, Lee KH (2010) Laparoscopic approach for suspected early-stage gallbladder carcinoma. Arch Surg 145:128–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Agarwal AK, Javed A, Kalayarasan R, Sakhuja P (2015) Minimally invasive versus the conventional open surgical approach of a radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study. HPB 17:536–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Itano O, Oshima G, Minagawa T, Shinoda M, Kitago M, Abe Y, Hibi T, Yagi H, Ikoma N, Aiko S, Kawaida M, Masugi Y, Kameyama K, Sakamoto M, Kitagawa Y (2015) Novel strategy for laparoscopic treatment of pT2 gallbladder carcinoma. Surg Endosc 29:3600–3607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shirobe T, Maruyama S (2015) Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection for gallbladder carcinoma. Surg Endosc 29:2244–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Palanisamy S, Patel N, Sabnis S, Palanisamy N, Vijay A, Palanivelu P, Parthasarthi R, Chinnusamy P (2016) Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for suspected early gall bladder carcinoma: thinking beyond convention. Surg Endosc 30:2442–2448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY, Choi Y, Lee W, Jang JY, Choi H (2015) Is laparoscopy contraindicated for gallbladder cancer? A 10-year prospective cohort study. J Am Coll Surg 221:847–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Buchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Birnbaum DJ, Vigano L, Russolillo N, Langella S, Ferrero A, Capussotti L (2015) Lymph node metastases in patients undergoing surgery for a gallbladder cancer. Extension of the lymph node dissection and prognostic value of the lymph node ratio. Ann Surg Oncol 22:811–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu GJ, Li XH, Chen YX, Sun HD, Zhao GM, Hu SY (2013) Radical lymph node dissection and assessment: impact on gallbladder cancer prognosis. World J Gastroenterol 19:5150–5158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ong CT, Leung K, Nussbaum DP, Sun Z, Gloor B, Blazer DG 3rd, Worni M (2018) Open versus laparoscopic portal lymphadenectomy in gallbladder cancer: is there a difference in lymph node yield? HPB 20:505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Evrard S, Falkenrodt A, Park A, Tassetti V, Mutter D, Marescaux J (1997) Influence of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on systemic and peritoneal cell-mediated immunity. World J Surg 21:353–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D’Angelica M, Dalal KM, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Jarnagin WR (2009) Analysis of the extent of resection for adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder. Ann Surg Oncol 16:806–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Goetze TO, Paolucci V (2010) Adequate extent in radical re-resection of incidental gallbladder carcinoma: analysis of the German Registry. Surg Endosc 24:2156–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Horiguchi A, Miyakawa S, Ishihara S, Miyazaki M, Ohtsuka M, Shimizu H, Sano K, Miura F, Ohta T, Kayahara M, Nagino M, Igami T, Hirano S, Yamaue H, Tani M, Yamamoto M, Ota T, Shimada M, Morine Y, Kinoshita H, Yasunaga M, Takada T (2013) Gallbladder bed resection or hepatectomy of segments 4a and 5 for pT2 gallbladder carcinoma: analysis of Japanese registration cases by the study group for biliary surgery of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:518–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chengwu Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

All authors including Dr. Changwei Dou, Dr. Yuhua Zhang, Dr. Jie Liu, Dr. Fangqiang Wei, Dr. Hongwu Chu, Dr. Junjun Han, Dr. Qifeng Yao, Dr. Jianyi Ding, and Dr. Chengwu Zhang have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dou, C., Zhang, Y., Liu, J. et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy approach of a radical resection for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 34, 2926–2938 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07075-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07075-4

Keywords

Navigation