Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modern era surgical outcomes of elective and emergency giant paraesophageal hernia repair at a high-volume referral center

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has historically been associated with significant morbidity and mortality such that elective repair is only offered to symptomatic patients. Recent reports suggest modern era outcomes have improved such that elective repair may now be safer than historically thought. Furthermore, the morbidity of emergency surgery may still be significant. These changes may have important implications for patient selection for elective repair.

The objectives of this study were to determine and compare modern era surgical outcomes after elective and emergency repair of giant PEHs at a high-volume tertiary care center.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted for all Type II–IV giant PEH repairs performed between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017. Type 1 hiatal hernias, fundoplication for reflux, and any co-surgery other than cholecystectomy were excluded from the final analysis. Baseline patient demographics, operative details, postoperative complications within 30 days and in-hospital or 30-day mortality were tabulated from the electronic medical record. Data were reported as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise specified.

Results

A total of 352 cases were reviewed, of which 204 met inclusion criteria (18 emergency, 186 elective). Eight had Type II PEH, 146 had Type III, and 50 had Type IV. Median length of stay was shorter in the elective group [1 (1) day elective vs. 5 (7) days emergency, p < 0.0001], and emergency patients were less likely to return directly to their original residence at discharge (13, 72% emergency vs 185, 99.4% elective, p < 0.0001). There were significantly more major complications (Clavien–Dindo score ≥ 3) in the emergency group (5, 28% emergency vs. 10, 5% elective, p = 0.005). There were no perioperative deaths in either group. Morbidity and mortality in both groups were less than historically reported.

Conclusions

Informed consent discussions and patient selection for repair of giant PEHs should reflect modern era and institution-specific outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Farrell TM, Patti MG (2017) Minimally invasive surgery should be the standard of care for paraesophageal hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 21(5):778–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3345-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gantert W, Arcerito M et al (1997) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias. J Am Coll Surg 186(4):428–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Diaz S, Brunt LM, Klingensmith ME et al (2003) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, a challenging operation: medium-term outcome of 116 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 7(1):59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1091-255x(02)00151-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2002) Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg 236(4):492–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pitcher DE, Curet MJ, Martin DT, Diana M, Mason MAJJ, Zucker KA (1995) Successful laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Arch Surg 130:590–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J et al (2006) Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 244(4):481–488. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000237759.42831.03

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Polomsky M, Jones CE, Sepesi B et al (2010) Should elective repair of intrathoracic stomach be encouraged? J Gastrointest Surg 14(2):203–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1106-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mueller C, Fried G (2016) Emerging technologies in surgery. In: Townsend C (ed) Sabiston’s textbook of surgery, the biological basis of modern surgical practice, 20th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bruns SD, Davis BR, Demirjian AN et al (2014) The subspecialization of surgery: a paradigm shift. J Gastrointest Surg 18(8):1523–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2514-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Finks J, Osborne N, Birkmeyer J (2011) Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 364(22):2128–2137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2010.12.017.two-stage

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jung JJ, Naimark DM, Behman R, Grantcharov TP (2017) Approach to asymptomatic paraesophageal hernia: watchful waiting or elective laparoscopic hernia repair? Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5755-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan JA, Schecter S, Lin MYC, Rogers SJ, Carter JT (2015) Morbidity and mortality associated with elective or emergency paraesophageal hernia repair. JAMA Surg 150(11):1094. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clavien P, Barkun J, de Oliveira M et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Skinner D, Besley R (1967) Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1,030 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53:33–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hill L (1973) Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia. A surgical emergency. Am J Surg 126:268–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Allaix ME, Patti MG (2017) Paraesophageal hernia repair in the USA: trends of utilization stratified by surgical volume and consequent impact on perioperative outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 21(8):1199–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3469-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Begg C, Cramer L, Hoskins W (1998) Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 280(20):1747–1751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoenfeld A, Ferrone M, Sturgeon D et al (2017) Volume–outcome relationship in surgical interventions for spinal metastases. JBJS 99(20):1753–1759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Capretti G et al (2012) Effect of surgeon volume on outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Surg 16(3):518–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Whealon MD, Blondet JJ, Gahagan JV, Phelan MJ, Nguyen NT (2017) Volume and outcomes relationship in laparoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 31(10):4224–4230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5482-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baxter N, Urbach D (2004) Does it matter what a hospital is “high volume” for? Specificity of hospital volume–outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data. BMJ 328:737–740. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Shabbir A, Dargan D (2014) Advancement and benefit of energy sealing in minimally invasive surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg 7(2):95–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Steinberg-Bernstein Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L8-512, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada

    Rafik K. Sorial, Mazzn Ali, Pepa Kaneva, Julio F. Fiore Jr., Melina Vassiliou, Gerald M. Fried, Liane S. Feldman, Lorenzo E. Ferri, Lawrence Lee & Carmen L. Mueller

  2. Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L8-512, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada

    Melina Vassiliou, Gerald M. Fried, Liane S. Feldman, Lorenzo E. Ferri, Lawrence Lee & Carmen L. Mueller

Authors
  1. Rafik K. Sorial
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mazzn Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pepa Kaneva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julio F. Fiore Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Melina Vassiliou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gerald M. Fried
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Liane S. Feldman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lorenzo E. Ferri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lawrence Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Carmen L. Mueller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen L. Mueller.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Sorial, Ali, Kaneva, Fiore Jr, Vassiliou, Fried, Feldman, Ferri, Lee and Mueller have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sorial, R.K., Ali, M., Kaneva, P. et al. Modern era surgical outcomes of elective and emergency giant paraesophageal hernia repair at a high-volume referral center. Surg Endosc 34, 284–289 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06764-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06764-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation