Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

True learning curve of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is generally the treatment of choice for diseases of the pancreatic body and tail. Most surgeons prefer the spleen- and splenic vessel-preserving technique (SPVP-LDP) in benign/borderline pancreatic disease because complications of splenic infarction and gastric varices can arise after Warshaw technique. This study was aimed to determine the true learning curve of the SPVP-LDP procedure not LDP including Warshaw technique.

Methods

Data were collected retrospectively from all patients who underwent a LDP between June 2007 and April 2017 at Gangnam Severance Hospital. We used cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) analysis to assess the learning curve for the SPVP-LDP technique.

Results

Eight-three patients were performed LDP and we excluded patients who underwent robotic approach (N = 10) and open conversion DP (N = 8). Patients who underwent SPVP-LDP procedures were categorized into Group 1 (primary end-point). Those who underwent LDP procedures with splenectomy and the Warshaw technique were categorized into Group 2. We found that the 16th case was the cutoff point and the mean length of hospital stay was 13.0 days in the first period and 8.7 days in the second period (p = < 0.001).

Conclusions

These results indicated that the frequency of SPVP-LDPs had increased and that technological progress had been made over time. The true learning curve for SPVP-LDP was indicated as 16 cases in a group of surgeons with no experience of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nigri GR, Rosman AS, Petrucciani N, Fancellu A, Pisano M, Zorcolo L, Ramacciato G, Melis M (2011) Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies. Surg Endosc 25(5):1642–1651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Song KB, Kim SC, Park JB, Kim YH, Jung YS, Kim MH, Lee SK, Seo DW, Lee SS, Park DH et al (2011) Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 25(10):3364–3372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoon YS, Lee KH, Han HS, Cho JY, Jang JY, Kim SW, Lee WJ, Kang CM, Park SJ, Han SS et al (2015) Effects of laparoscopic versus open surgery on splenic vessel patency after spleen and splenic vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc 29(3):583–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrone CR, Konstantinidis IT, Sahani DV, Wargo JA, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL (2011) Twenty-three years of the Warshaw operation for distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen. Ann Surg 253(6):1136–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carrere N, Abid S, Julio CH, Bloom E, Pradere B (2007) Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with excision of splenic artery and vein: a case-matched comparison with conventional distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy. World J Surg 31(2):375–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Louis D, Alassiri A, Kirzin S, Blaye-Felice S, Chalret du Rieu M, Julio CH, Bloom E, Ghouti L, Pradere B, Portier G et al (2017) Gastric bleeding risk following spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy with excision of the splenic vessels: a long-term follow-up. HPB (Oxford) 19(4):345–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Butturini G, Inama M, Malleo G, Manfredi R, Melotti GL, Piccoli M, Perandini S, Pederzoli P, Bassi C (2012) Perioperative and long-term results of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic vessels conservation: a retrospective analysis. J Surg Oncol 105(4):387–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Park JS, Lee DH, Jang JY, Han Y, Yoon DS, Kim JK, Han HS, Yoon Y, Hwang D, Kang CM et al (2016) Use of TachoSil((R)) patches to prevent pancreatic leaks after distal pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 23(2):110–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sahakyan MA, Kazaryan AM, Rawashdeh M, Fuks D, Shmavonyan M, Haugvik SP, Labori KJ, Buanes T, Rosok BI, Ignjatovic D et al (2016) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results of a multicenter cohort study on 196 patients. Surg Endosc 30(8):3409–3418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Joliat GR, Demartines N, Halkic N, Petermann D, Schafer M (2017) Short-term outcomes after distal pancreatectomy: laparotomy vs. laparoscopy: a single-center series. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 13:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson KL Jr, Adam MA, Thomas S, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2017) Impact of minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy on use of adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 213(4):601–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS, Bassi C, Delvaux G, Weerts J, Fabre JM, Boulez J, Baulieux J, Peix JL et al (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137(6):597–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruzoni M, Sasson AR (2008) Open and laparoscopic spleen-preserving, splenic vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 12(7):1202–1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sato Y, Shimoda S, Takeda N, Tanaka N, Hatakeyama K (2000) Evaluation of splenic circulation after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by dividing the splenic artery and vein. Dig Surg 17(5):519–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miura F, Takada T, Asano T, Kenmochi T, Ochiai T, Amano H, Yoshida M (2005) Hemodynamic changes of splenogastric circulation after spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with excision of splenic artery and vein. Surgery 138(3):518–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tien YW, Liu KL, Hu RH, Wang HP, Chang KJ, Lee PH (2010) Risk of varices bleeding after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with excision of splenic artery and vein. Ann Surg Oncol 17(8):2193–2198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim H, Song KB, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Shin SH, Jun ES, Kim SR, Kwak BJ, Kim TG, Park KM et al (2016) A single-center experience with the laparoscopic Warshaw technique in 122 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 30(9):4057–4064

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeon HH, Lee HS, Youn YH, Park JJ, Park H (2016) Learning curve analysis of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for laterally spreading tumors by endoscopists experienced in gastric ESD. Surg Endosc 30(6):2422–2430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nachmany I, Pencovich N, Ben-Yehuda A, Lahat G, Nakache R, Goykhman Y, Lubezky N, Klausner JM (2016) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: learning curve and experience in a tertiary center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(6):470–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, Tsung A, Choudry HA, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ et al (2015) The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB (Oxford) 17(7):580–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. de Rooij T, Cipriani F, Rawashdeh M, van Dieren S, Barbaro S, Abuawwad M, van Hilst J, Fontana M, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M (2017) Single-surgeon learning curve in 111 laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: does operative time tell the whole story? J Am Coll Surg 224(5):826–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pancreatobiliary Cancer Clinic, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

    Hyung Sun Kim & Joon Seong Park

  2. Pancreatobiliary Cancer Clinic, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

    Dong Sup Yoon

Authors
  1. Hyung Sun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joon Seong Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dong Sup Yoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joon Seong Park.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Hyung Sun Kim, Joon Seong Park, and Dong Sup Yoon have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H.S., Park, J.S. & Yoon, D.S. True learning curve of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation. Surg Endosc 33, 88–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6277-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6277-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation