Abstract
Introduction
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) with intraperitoneal mesh placement is well established; however, the fate of patients requiring future abdominal operations is not well understood. This study identifies the characteristics of LVHR patients undergoing reoperation and the sequelae of reoperation.
Methods
A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at a hernia referral center identified patients who underwent LVHR between 2005 and 2014 and then underwent a subsequent abdominal operation. The outcomes of those reoperations were collected. Data are presented as a mean with ranges.
Results
A total of 733 patients underwent LVHR. The average age was 56.5 years, BMI 33.9 kg/m2, hernia size 115 cm2 (range 1–660 cm2), and mesh size 411 cm2 (range 17.7–1360 cm2). After a mean follow-up of 19.4 months, the overall hernia recurrence rate was 8.4 %. Subsequent abdominal operations were performed in 17 % (125 patients) at a mean 2.2 years. The most common indication for reoperation was recurrent hernia (33 patients, 26.4 %), followed by bowel obstruction (18 patients, 14.4 %), hepatopancreaticobiliary (17 patients, 13.6 %) and infected mesh removal (15 patients, 12 %), gynecologic (10 patients, 8 %), colorectal (8 patients, 6.4 %), bariatric (4 patients, 3 %), trauma (1 patient, 0.8 %), and other (19 patients, 15 %). The overall incidence of enterotomy or unplanned bowel resection (EBR) at reoperation was 4 %. This occurred exclusively in those reoperated for complete bowel obstruction, and the reason for EBR was mesh–bowel adhesions. No other indication for reoperation resulted in EBR. The incidence of secondary mesh infection after subsequent operation was 2.4 %.
Conclusion
In a large consecutive series of LVHR, the rate of abdominal reoperation was 17 %. Generally, these reoperations can be performed safely. A reoperation for bowel obstruction, however, may carry an increased risk of EBR as a direct result of mesh–bowel adhesions. Secondary mesh infection after reoperation, although rare, may also occur. Surgeons should discuss with their patients the potential long-term implications of having an intraperitoneal mesh and how it may impact future abdominal surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 16:179–183. doi:10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9
Burger JWA, Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EGG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–583 (discussion 583–585)
LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:39–41
Rives J, Pire JC, Flament JB, Convers G (1977) Treatment of large eventrations (apropos of 133 cases). Minerva Chir 32:749–756
Itani KMF, Hur K, Kim LT, Anthony T, Berger DH, Reda D, Neumayer L, Veterans Affairs Ventral Incisional Hernia Investigators (2010) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 145:322–328. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.18 (discussion 328)
Ten Broek RPG, Strik C, Issa Y, Bleichrodt RP, Van Goor H (2013) Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 258:98–106. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826f4969
Gray SH, Vick CC, Graham LA, Finan KR, Neumayer LA, Hawn MT (2008) Risk of complications from enterotomy or unplanned bowel resection during elective hernia repair. Arch Surg 143:582–586. doi:10.1001/archsurg.143.6.582
Halm JA, de Wall LL, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2007) Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh hernia repair complicates subsequent abdominal surgery. World J Surg 31:423–429. doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0317-9 (discussion 430)
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:250–278. doi:10.1086/501620 (quiz 279–280)
Liang MK, Li LT, Nguyen MT, Berger RL, Hicks SC, Kao LS (2014) Abdominal reoperation and mesh explantation following open ventral hernia repair with mesh. Am J Surg 208:670–676. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.024
Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Vick CC, Hawn MT (2011) Effect of mesh type and position on subsequent abdominal operations after incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 212:496–502. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Drs. Patel and Love and Mr. Ewing have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclosure. Dr Warren has received honoraria from Intuitive Surgical, W. L. Gore and Associates, and Maquet Medical. Dr. Cobb has received honoraria from Ethicon, W. L. Gore and Associates, and Maquet Medical. Dr. Carbonell has received honoraria from Intuitive Surgical, W. L. Gore and Associates, and Maquet Medical.
Author’s contribution
Study conception and design: Warren, Carbonell, Cobb; Acquisition of data: Patel, Love, Warren, Cobb; Analysis and interpretation of data: Patel, Ewing, Warren, Carbonell; Drafting of manuscript: Patel; Critical revision: Carbonell, Warren, Cobb.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patel, P.P., Love, M.W., Ewing, J.A. et al. Risks of subsequent abdominal operations after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 31, 823–828 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5038-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5038-z