Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic suturing versus endoscopic clip closure of the mucosotomy during a per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a case–control study

  • Endoluminal Surgery
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Obtaining an adequate mucosal closure is one of the crucial steps in per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Thus far, there have been no objective data comparing the various available closure techniques. This case-controlled study attempts to compare the application of endoscopic clips versus endoscopic suturing for mucosotomy closure during POEM cases.

Methods

A retrospective review of our prospective POEM database was performed. All cases in which endoscopic suturing was used to close the mucosotomy were matched to cases in which standard endoclips were used. Overall complication rate, closure time and mucosal closure costs between the two groups were compared.

Results

Both techniques offer good clinical results with good mucosal closure and the absence of postoperative leak. Closure time was significantly shorter (p = 0.044) with endoscopic clips (16 ± 12 min) when compared to endoscopic suturing (33 ± 11 min). Overall, the total closure cost analysis showed a trend toward lower cost with clips (1502 ± 849 USD) versus endoscopic suturing (2521 ± 575 USD) without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.073).

Conclusion

The use of endoscopic suturing seems to be a safe method for mucosal closure in POEM cases. Closure time is longer with suturing than conventional closure with clips, and there is a trend toward higher overall cost. Endoscopic suturing is likely most cost-effective for difficult cases where conventional closure methods fail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eleftheriadis N et al (2012) Training in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Ther Clin Risk Manag 8:329–342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pescarus R et al (2014) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 16(1):369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Swanstrom LL et al (2012) Long-term outcomes of an endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: the POEM procedure. Ann Surg 256(4):659–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharata AM et al (2015) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal primary motility disorders: analysis of 100 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 19(1):161–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khashab MA et al (2015) International multicenter experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 81(5):1170–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saxena P et al (2013) An alternative method for mucosal flap closure during peroral endoscopic myotomy using an over-the-scope clipping device. Endoscopy 45(7):579–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ling T et al (2013) Successful use of a covered, retrievable stent to seal a ruptured mucosal flap safety valve during peroral endoscopic myotomy in a child with achalasia. Endoscopy 45(Suppl 2 UCTN):E63-4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurian AA et al (2013) Endoscopic suture repair of full-thickness esophagotomy during per-oral esophageal myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc 27(10):3910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li H, Linghu E, Wang X (2012) Fibrin sealant for closure of mucosal penetration at the cardia during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Endoscopy 44(Suppl 2 UCTN):E215-6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding or grants were used for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radu Pescarus.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Radu Pescarus, Eran Shlomovitz, Ahmed M. Sharata, Maria A. Cassera, Kevin M. Reavis, Christy M. Dunst and Lee L. Swanström have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pescarus, R., Shlomovitz, E., Sharata, A.M. et al. Endoscopic suturing versus endoscopic clip closure of the mucosotomy during a per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a case–control study. Surg Endosc 30, 2132–2135 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4464-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4464-7

Keywords

Navigation