Skip to main content
Log in

Safety and long-term outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is used for nutritional support during treatment in patients with head and neck cancer, but long-term nutritional outcomes have not been reported in detail. The purpose of this study was to determine short- and long-term outcomes and success in meeting nutritional goals in patients with head and neck cancer who had PEGs placed over an 18-year period.

Methods

Medical records of all patients who had PEG procedures performed by one of the authors (REB) from 1997 through 2010 were reviewed. Demographic data, patient weights, timing of procedure in relation to cancer treatment, complications, and long-term outcomes were recorded.

Results

Five hundred and sixty-five patients with head and neck cancer underwent PEG. Mean age was 59.6 ± 13.6 years; 71 % were men. Mean follow-up was 33 ± 38 months. 99 % of PEGs were used for nutritional support. Average weight loss prior to PEG was 23 ± 17 lbs (range 0–133 lbs). Average weight loss between PEG and completion of treatment was 2.3 lbs; 44 % of patients gained weight or remained stable after PEG. There were no PEG-related deaths. Complications included cellulitis in 27 (4 %), pain in 14 (2.5 %); leakage in 11 (2 %), self-limited gastric bleeding in one patient. PEGs were used an average of 8.1 months. No PEG site tumor implants were observed. Among 366 patients treated with intention to cure, 45 % were alive an average of 68 months later.

Conclusions

PEG is both safe and efficacious in arresting weight loss and maintaining nutrition in patients undergoing surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. PEG can be recommended for patients in whom dysphagia and weight loss is anticipated or in whom weight loss occurs as a result of their treatment; 20 % of patients will need the PEG for a year or more.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ (1980) Gastrostomy without laparotomy A percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Ped Surg 15(6):872–875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunter JG, Lauretano L, Shellito PC (1989) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients. Ann Surg 210(1):42–46

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rabeneck L, Wray NP, Petersen NJ (1996) Long-term outcomes of patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. J Gen Intern Med 11:287–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grant DG, Bradley PT, Pothier DD, Bailey D, Caldera S, Baldwin DL, Birchall MA (2009) Complications following gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with head and neck cancer: a prospective multi-institution study, systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Otolaryngol 34:103–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed KA, Samant S, Vieira F (2005) Gastrostomy tubes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 115(1):44–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McLaughlin BT, Gokhale AS, Shuai Y, Diacopoulos J, Carrau R, Heron DE, Smith RP, Gibson MK, Ferris RL, Grandis JR, Johnson JT, Argiris A (2010) Management of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer without prophylactic feeding tubes: the University of Pittsburgh experience. Laryngoscope 120:71–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jl Locher, Bonner JA, Carroll WR, Caudell JJ, Keith JN, Kilgore ML, Ritchie CS, Roth DL, Tajeu GS, Allison JJ (2011) Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in treatment of head and neck cancer: a comprehensive review and call for evidence based medicine. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 35(3):365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lawson JD, Gaultney J, Saba N, Grist W, Davis L, Johnstone PA (2009) Percutaneous feeding tubes in patents with head and neck cancer: rethinking prophylactic placement for patients undergoing chemoradiation. Am J Otolaryngol 30(4):244–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raykher A, Correa L, Russo L, Brown P, Lee N, Pfister D, Gerdes H, Shah J, Kraus D, Schattner M, Shike M (2009) The role of pretreatment percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in facilitating therapy of head and neck cancer and optimizing the body mass index of the obese patient. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 33(4):404–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Itkin M, DeLegge H, Fang JC, McClave SA, Kundu S, d’Othee BJ, Martinez-Salazar G, Sacks D, Swan T, Tobin R, Walker G, Wojak J, Zuckerman D, Cardella J (2011) Multidisciplinary practical guidelines for gastrointestinal Access for enteral nutrition and decompression. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:1089–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith BM, Perring P, Engoren M, Sferra JJ (2008) Hospital and long-term outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Surg Endosc 22:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morgenstern L, Laquer M, Treyzon L (2005) Ethical challenges of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Surg Endosc 19:398–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolf GT, Forastiere A, Ang K, Brockstein B, Conley C, Goepfert H, Kraus D, Lefevre J, Pajak TF, Pfister D, Urba S (1999) Organ preservation strategies in advanced head and neck cancer–current status and future directions. Head Neck 21:689–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Urba SG, Forastiere AA, Wolf GT, Esclamado RM, McLaughln PW, Thornton AF (1994) Intensive induction chemotherapy and radiation for organ preservation in patients with advanced resectable head and neck carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 12(5):946–953

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adelson RT, Yadranko D (2005) Metastatic head and neck carcinoma to a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site. Head Neck 27:339–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Burney and Bryner have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard E. Burney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burney, R.E., Bryner, B.S. Safety and long-term outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer. Surg Endosc 29, 3685–3689 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4126-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4126-9

Keywords

Navigation