Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Role of endoscopic stents and selective minimal access drainage in oesophageal leaks: feasibility and outcome

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Leaks following oesophageal surgery are considered to be amongst the most dreaded complications and contributory to postoperative mortality. Controversies still exist regarding the best option for the management of oesophageal leaks due to lack of standardized treatment protocols. This study was designed to analyse the feasibility outcome and complications associated with placement of removable, fully covered, self-expanding metallic stents for oesophageal leaks with concomitant minimally invasive drainage when appropriate.

Methods

The study group included 32 patients from a prospectively maintained database of oesophageal leaks, with the majority being anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive oesophagectomy (n = 28), followed by laparoscopic cardiomyotomy (n = 3) and extended total gastrectomy (n = 1). The procedures took place between March 2007 and April 2013.

Results

Most patients had an intrathoracic leak (n = 22), with a mean time to detection of the leak following surgery of 7.50 days (SD = 2.23). Subsequent to endoscopic stenting, enteral feeding via a nasojejunal tube was started on the second day and oral feeding was delayed until the 14th day (n = 31). Six patients underwent thoracoscopic (n = 5) or laparoscopic drainage (n = 1) along with stenting for significant mediastinal and intra-abdominal contamination. The stent migration rate of our study was 8.54 %. The overall success in terms of preventing mortality was 96 %.

Conclusion

Endoscopic stenting should be considered a primary option for managing oesophageal leaks. Delayed oral intake may reduce the incidence of stent migration. Larger stents (bariatric or colorectal stents) serve as a useful option in case of migrated stents. Combined minimally invasive procedures can be safely adapted in appropriate clinical circumstances and may contribute to better outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Uttley L, Campbell F, Rhodes M, Cantrell A, Stegenga H, Lloyd-Jones M (2013) Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage? Surg Endosc 27:724–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kauer WK, Stein HJ, Dittler HJ, Stewart JR (2008) Stent implantation as a treatment option in patients with thoracic anastomosis leaks after esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 22:50–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dai YY, Gretschel S, Dudeck O (2009) Treatment of oesophageal leaks by temporary stenting with self expanding plastic stents. Br J Surg 96:887–891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lerut T, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, Nafteux P, van Raemdonck D (2002) Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Dig Surg 19(2):92–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Whooley BP, Law S, Alexandrou A, Murthy SC, Wong J (2001) Critical appraisal of the significance of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer. Am J Surg 181(3):198–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alanezi K, Urschel JD (2004) Mortality secondary to oesophageal anastomatic leak. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10:71–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomatic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lawrence L et al (2004) Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 77:1475–1489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Amir AI, van Dullemen H, Plukker JT (2004) Selective approach in the treatment of esophageal perforations. Scand J Gastroenterol 39:418–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD et al (2005) Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 241:1016–1021

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hünerbein M, Stroszczynski C, Moesta KT, Schlag PM (2004) Treatment of thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy with self-expanding plastic stents. Ann Surg 240(5):801–807

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schweigert M, Dubecz A, Stadlhuber RJ, Muschweck H, Stein HJ (2011) Treatment of intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks by means of endoscopic stent implantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 12(2):147–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Freeman RK, Vyverberg A, Ascioti AJ (2011) Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of acute intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 92(1):204–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Siersema PD, Homs MY, Haringsma J, Tilanus HW, Kuipers EJ (2003) Use of large-diameter metallic stents to seal traumatic nonmalignant perforations of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 58(3):356–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eisendrath P, Cremer M, Himpens J, Cadière GB, Le Moine O, Devière J (2007) Endotherapy including temporary stenting of fistulas of the upper gastrointestinal tract after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Endoscopy 39(7):625–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Langer FB, Wenzl E, Prager G, Salat A, Miholic J, Mang T, Zacherl J (2005) Management of postoperative esophageal leaks with the Polyflex self-expanding covered plastic stent. Ann Thorac Surg 79(2):398–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leers JM, Vivaldi C, Schäfer H, Bludau M, Brabender J, Lurje G, Herbold T, Hölscher AH, Metzger R (2009) Endoscopic therapy for esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with a self-expandable metallic stent. Surg Endosc 23(10):2258–2262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dai Y, Chopra SS, Kneif S, Hünerbein M (2011) Management of oesophageal anastomotic leaks, perforations, and fistulae with self-expanding plastic stents. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141(5):1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Salminen P, Gullichsen R, Laine S (2009) Use of self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of oesophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks. Surg Endosc 23(7):1526–1530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tuebergen D, Rijcken E, Mennigen R, Hopkins AM, Senninger N, Bruewer M (2008) Treatment of thoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks and esophageal perforations with endoluminal stents: efficacy and current limitations. J Gastrointest Surg 12(7):1168–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blackmon SH, Santora R, Schwarz P, Barroso A, Dunkin BJ (2010) Utility of removable esophageal covered self-expanding metal stents for leak and fistula management. Ann Thorac Surg 89(3):931–936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dai Y, Chopra SS, Steinbach M, Kneif S, Hünerbein M (2011) Esophageal stents for leaks and perforations. Semin Thorac Surg 23:159–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leenders BJ, Stronkhorst A, Smulders FJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Gilissen LP (2013) Removable and repositionable covered metal self-expandable stents for leaks after upper gastrointestinal surgery: experiences in a tertiary referral hospital. Surg Endosc 27:2751–2759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bona D, Laface L, Bonavina L, Abate E, Schaffer M, Ugenti I, Siboni S, Carrinola R (2010) Covered nitinol stents for the treatment of esophageal strictures and leaks. World J Gastroenterol 16(18):2260–2264

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eubanks S, Edwards CA, Fearing NM, Ramaswamy A, De la Torre RA, Thaler KJ, Miedema BW, Scott JS (2008) Use of endoscopic stents to treat anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg 206(5):935–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schweigert M, Solymosi N, Dubecz A, Stadlhuber RJ, Muschweck H, Ofner D, Stein HJ (2013) Endoscopic stent insertion for anastomotic leakage following oesophagectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95:43–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Rajan, Bansal, Balaji, Rajapandian, Parthasarathi, Senthilnathan, Praveenraj, and Palanivelu have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Upper GI Surgery and Therapeutic Endoscopy, GEM Hospital, 45/A Pankaja Mill Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, 641045, India

    P. S. Rajan, S. Bansal, N. S. Balaji, S. Rajapandian, R. Parthasarathi, P. Senthilnathan, P. Praveenraj & C. Palanivelu

Authors
  1. P. S. Rajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Bansal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. S. Balaji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Rajapandian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Parthasarathi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. Senthilnathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. P. Praveenraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. C. Palanivelu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. S. Rajan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajan, P.S., Bansal, S., Balaji, N.S. et al. Role of endoscopic stents and selective minimal access drainage in oesophageal leaks: feasibility and outcome. Surg Endosc 28, 2368–2373 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3471-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3471-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation