Skip to main content
Log in

Pilot study evaluating the efficacy of AlloMEM™ for prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions and peritoneal regeneration after loop ileostomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of AlloMEM™, a novel lyophililzed human peritoneal membrane, at peritoneal reconstitution, and decreasing adhesion formation after temporary loop ileostomy.

Methods In a pilot study, ten patients had AlloMEM™ used during elective formation of a temporary diverting loop ileostomy for benign or malignant colorectal disease. A blinded investigator and the operating surgeon analyzed the change in adhesion formation and peritoneal remodelling using ileostomy mobilization time and a 5-point adhesion scale grading intra-abdominally and at the subcutaneous and fascial levels.

Results The mean body mass index was 31 [standard deviation (SD) 5.6], and 40 % of patients had previous abdominal surgery. Ileostomies were reversed after a mean 14 weeks (SD 6.0). The mean ileostomy mobilization time was 27.2 min (SD 12.0). From baseline to ileostomy reversal, there were significant increases in adhesions at the subcutaneous (p = 0.0002) and fascial levels (p = 0.0024). The increased subcutaneous adhesions were associated with improved peritoneal remodeling. There was no significant increase in adhesions from baseline to ileostomy reversal at the intra-abdominal points (p = 0.9393) or around the ileostomy site (p = 0.6128). The median hospital length of stay was 2.6 days (range, 2–3). A single adverse event related to product packaging led to redesign of the packaging process.

Conclusions Use of AlloMEM™ in ileostomy closures suggested improvement in adhesions around the fascia and promotion of peritoneal remodeling. AlloMEM™ was safe, feasible, and easy to use in this pilot study. Comparative research is needed to assess the outcomes with this novel product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D’Haeninck A, Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, D’Hondt M, D’Hoore A (2011) Morbidity after closure of a defunctioning loop ileostomy. Acta Chir Belg 111(3):136–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ihedioha U, Muhtaseb S, Kalmar K, Donnelly L, Muir V, Macdonald A (2010) Closure of loop ileostomies: is early discharge safe and achievable? Scott Med J 55(1):27–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Russek K, George JM, Zafar N, Cuevas-Estandia P, Franklin M (2011) Laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal: reducing morbidity while improving functional outcomes. JSLS 15(4):475–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Winslet MC, Barsoum G, Pringle W, Fox K, Keighley MR (1991) Loop ileostomy after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis–is it necessary? Dis Colon Rectum 34(3):267–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M, Fazio VW (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48(2):243–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, Henderson SC, Perry S (1998) Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 186(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Voskerician G, Jin J, Hunter SA, Williams CP, White M, Rosen MJ (2009) Human peritoneal membrane reduces the formation of intra-abdominal adhesions in ventral hernia repair: experimental study in a chronic hernia rat model. J Surg Res 157(1):108–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin J, Voskerician G, Hunter SA, McGee MF, Cavazzola LT, Schomisch S, Harth K, Rosen MJ (2009) Human peritoneal membrane controls adhesion formation and host tissue response following intra-abdominal placement in a porcine model. J Surg Res 156(2):297–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Diamond MP (1996) Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): a blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study. Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group. Fertil Steril 66(6):904–910

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fazio VW, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, van Goor H, Bauer JJ, Wolff BG, Corman M, Beart RWJ, Wexner SD, Becker JM et al (2006) Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 49(1):1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Remzi FH, Oncel M, Church JM, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2003) An unusual complication after hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) application. Am Surg 69(4):356–357

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This IRB-approved clinical study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01113736) was cosponsored by Proxy Biomedical Limited (exclusive distributor of AlloMEM™) and Community Tissue Services (tissue bank processor of AlloMEM™).

Disclosures

The authors have no disclosure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah S. Keller.

Additional information

Poster Presentation, SAGES 2013 Annual Conference, Baltimore, MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, D.S., Champagne, B.J., Stein, S.L. et al. Pilot study evaluating the efficacy of AlloMEM™ for prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions and peritoneal regeneration after loop ileostomy. Surg Endosc 27, 3891–3896 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3004-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3004-6

Keywords

Navigation