Skip to main content
Log in

Effective and efficient learning in the operating theater with intraoperative video-enhanced surgical procedure training

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

INtraoperative Video Enhanced Surgical procedure Training (INVEST) is a new training method designed to improve the transition from basic skills training in a skills lab to procedural training in the operating theater. Traditionally, the master–apprentice model (MAM) is used for procedural training in the operating theater, but this model lacks uniformity and efficiency at the beginning of the learning curve. This study was designed to investigate the effectiveness and efficiency of INVEST compared to MAM.

Methods

Ten surgical residents with no laparoscopic experience were recruited for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy training curriculum either by the MAM or with INVEST. After a uniform course in basic laparoscopic skills, each trainee performed six cholecystectomies that were digitally recorded. For 14 steps of the procedure, an observer who was blinded for the type of training determined whether the step was performed entirely by the trainee (2 points), partially by the trainee (1 point), or by the supervisor (0 points). Time measurements revealed the total procedure time and the amount of effective procedure time during which the trainee acted as the operating surgeon. Results were compared between both groups.

Results

Trainees in the INVEST group were awarded statistically significant more points (115.8 vs. 70.2; p < 0.001) and performed more steps without the interference of the supervisor (46.6 vs. 18.8; p < 0.001). Total procedure time was not lengthened by INVEST, and the part performed by trainees was significantly larger (69.9 vs. 54.1 %; p = 0.004).

Conclusions

INVEST enhances effectiveness and training efficiency for procedural training inside the operating theater without compromising operating theater time efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (1999) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:466–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Det MJ, Meijerink WJ, Hoff C, Totte ER, Pierie JP (2009) Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc 23:1279–1285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30:617–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Det MJ, Meijerink WJ, Hoff C, Van Veelen MA, Pierie JP (2008) Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 22:2421–2427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2006) Technical-skills training in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 355:2695–2696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Furnee EJ, van Empel PJ, Mahdavian Delavary B, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA, Meijerink WJ (2009) Evaluation of a technical skills training program in surgical residents. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:615–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Okrainec A, Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL, Fried GM (2011) Trends and results of the first 5 years of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) certification testing. Surg Endosc 25:1192–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2009) Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD006575

  9. Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Schroeder TV, Ottesen BS (2009) Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 338:b1802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Panait L, Akkary E, Bell RL, Roberts KE, Dudrick SJ, Duffy AJ (2009) The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. J Surg Res 156:312–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Botden SM, Torab F, Buzink SN, Jakimowicz JJ (2008) The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation. Surg Endosc 22:1214–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Det MJ, Meijerink WJ, Hoff C, Middel LJ, Koopal SA, Pierie JP (2011) The learning effect of intra operative video enhanced surgical procedure training. Surg Endosc 25:2261–2267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Schijven MP, Dankelman J (2007) Construct validity and assessment of the learning curve for the SIMENDO endoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 21:1406–1412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Verdaasdonk EG, Dankelman J, Lange JF, Stassen LP (2008) Incorporation of proficiency criteria for basic laparoscopic skills training: how does it work? Surg Endosc 22:2609–2615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guideline Galsteenziekte (2007) Appendix D: “Best practice” laparoscopische cholecystectomie. Dutch Soc Surg. http://www.heelkunde.nl/kwaliteit/richtlijnen/richtlijnen-definitief. Accessed Nov 2009

  17. Strasberg SM (2002) Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat 9:543–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen J (1988) The t test for means. In: Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 19–74

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank J. M. P. Collins for reviewing the text. They also thank the supervising surgeons and participating residents for their contribution.

Disclosures

Drs. M. J. van Det, W. J. H. J. Meijerink, C. Hoff, B. Middel, and J. P. E. N. Pierie have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. van Det.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Det, M.J., Meijerink, W.J.H.J., Hoff, C. et al. Effective and efficient learning in the operating theater with intraoperative video-enhanced surgical procedure training. Surg Endosc 27, 2947–2954 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2862-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2862-2

Keywords

Navigation