Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The degree of gallbladder wall thickness and its impact on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold-standard procedure for management of symptomatic gallstone disease. Increased rates of conversion to an open procedure, increased postoperative complications, and longer lengths of stay are seen in thick-walled gallbladders. Previous studies have only evaluated gallbladder walls as being thick or not thick, without looking at the degree of thickness. We hypothesized that, the more severe the wall thickening, the greater the chance of conversions and complications, and the longer the lengths of stay.

Methods

All attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomies in our institution between 2006 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing cholecystectomy for reasons other than gallstones (e.g., polyps or cancer) and those without preoperative ultrasounds were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups based on the degree of gallbladder wall thickness: normal (1–2 mm), mildly thickened (3–4 mm), moderately thickened (5–6 mm), and severely thickened (7 mm and above). Outcomes were compared amongst the groups.

Results

874 patients were included in the study. There were 68 conversions (7.8 %) and 58 complications (6.6 %). The incidence of conversions was 3.1, 5.1, 14.9, and 16.8 % in the four groups, respectively (p < 0.001, χ 2), and the incidence of complications was 1.8, 6.7, 9.1, and 13.1 %, respectively (p = 0.001, χ 2). The mean (± standard deviation, SD) length of stay in days was 1.09 ± 1.42, 1.83 ± 3.24, 2.54 ± 3.40 and 3.54 ± 4.61, respectively [p < 0.001, analysis of variance (ANOVA)].

Conclusions

A greater degree of gallbladder wall thickness is associated with an increased risk of conversion, increased postoperative complications, and longer lengths of stay. Classifying patients according to degree of gallbladder wall thickness gives more accurate assessment of the risk of surgery, as well as potential outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1,518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hollington P, Toogood GJ, Padbury RT (1999) A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust N Z J Surg 69:841–843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Trondsen E, Reiertsen O, Andersen OK, Kjaersgaard P (1993) Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Eur J Surg 159:217–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Parshad R, Seenu V (2004) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 18:1323–1327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Simopoulos C, Botaitis S, Polychronidis A, Tripsianis G, Karayiannakis AJ (2005) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19:905–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanabria JR, Gallinger S, Croxford R, Strasberg SM (1994) Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 179:696–704

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, Chu KM (1996) Factors affecting conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Arch Surg 131:98–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiebke EA, Pruitt AL, Howard TJ, Jacobson LE, Broadie TA, Goulet RJ Jr, Canal DF (1996) Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. An analysis of risk factors. Surg Endosc 10:742–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, Schwartz JS, Williams SV (1996) Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 224:609–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J (2002) Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 184:254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Farkas DT, Moradi D, Moaddel D, Nagpal K, Cosgrove JM (2011) The impact of body mass index on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc

  12. Murphy MM, Shah SA, Simons JP, Csikesz NG, McDade TP, Bodnari A, Ng SC, Zhou Z, Tseng JF (2009) Predicting major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a simple risk score. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1929–1936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Low SW, Iyer SG, Chang SK, Mak KS, Lee VT, Madhavan K (2009) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: safe implementation of successful strategies to reduce conversion rates. Surg Endosc 23:2424–2429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lal P, Agarwal PN, Malik VK, Chakravarti AL (2002) A difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy that requires conversion to open procedure can be predicted by preoperative ultrasonography. JSLS 6:59–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishizaki Y, Miwa K, Yoshimoto J, Sugo H, Kawasaki S (2006) Conversion of elective laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy between 1993 and 2004. Br J Surg 93:987–991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Garwood R, Hanks J (2008) Asymptomatic (silent) gallstones. In: Cameron J (ed) Current Surgical Therapy. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  17. Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th Inderbitzin D, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 203:723–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murphy MM, Ng SC, Simons JP, Csikesz NG, Shah SA, Tseng JF (2010) Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient? J Am Coll Surg 211:73–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Garber SM, Korman J, Cosgrove JM, Cohen JR (1997) Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 11:347–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jansen S, Jorgensen J, Caplehorn J, Hunt D (1997) Preoperative ultrasound to predict conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:121–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kama NA, Doganay M, Dolapci M, Reis E, Atli M, Kologlu M (2001) Risk factors resulting in conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Surg Endosc 15:965–968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yacoub WN, Petrosyan M, Sehgal I, Ma Y, Chandrasoma P, Mason RJ (2010) Prediction of patients with acute cholecystitis requiring emergent cholecystectomy: a simple score. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2010:901739

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL (1993) Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 217:233–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chandio A, Timmons S, Majeed A, Twomey A, Aftab F (2009) Factors influencing the successful completion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 13:581–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown E, Hawasli A, Lloyd L (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: morbidity and mortality in a community teaching institution. J Laparoendosc Surg 3:13–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Peters JH, Gibbons GD, Innes JT, Nichols KE, Front ME, Roby SR, Ellison EC (1991) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 110:769–777 discussion 777–768

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Haji A, Khan A, Haq A, Ribeiro B (2009) Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgical trainees: predictive factors of operative time. Surg J R Coll Surg Edinb Ireland 7:207–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jackson TD, Wannares JJ, Lancaster RT, Rattner DW, Hutter MM (2011) Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 25:2288–2295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chandler CF, Lane JS, Ferguson P, Thompson JE, Ashley SW (2000) Prospective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am Surg 66:896–900

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, Abrahamson J, Matter I (1997) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:407–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheruvu CV, Eyre-Brook IA (2002) Consequences of prolonged wait before gallbladder surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:20–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Authors Raman, Moradi, Samaan, Chaudhry, Nagpal, Cosgrove, and Farkas have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel T. Farkas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raman, S.R., Moradi, D., Samaan, B.M. et al. The degree of gallbladder wall thickness and its impact on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26, 3174–3179 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2310-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2310-8

Keywords

Navigation