Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques for rectovaginal endometriosis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to compare the surgical outcomes of standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques for the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in a teaching and research hospital (tertiary center), which included 75 women subjected to laparoscopic treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis that required both vaginal resection and rectal surgery. Standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques were compared in 35 and 40 women, respectively. Student’s t test, Mann–Whitney test, and Fisher’s exact test were performed to compare groups when needed; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in operating time, blood loss, conversion rate, major intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and minor postoperative complications between the two techniques. The rate of major postoperative complications for the standard technique was 22.9%, whereas only 5% for the reverse technique (p = 0.02). The rate of postoperative rectovaginal fistula was the same for both techniques.

Conclusions

Major postoperative complications were reduced by using the reverse technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carmona F, Martínez-Zamora A, González X, Ginés A, Buñesch L, Balasch J (2009) Does the learning curve of conservative laparoscopic surgery in women with rectovaginal endometriosis impair the recurrence rate? Fertil Steril 92:868–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kristensen J, Kjer JJ (2007) Laparoscopic laser resection of rectovaginal pouch and rectovaginal septum endometriosis: the impact on pelvic pain and quality of life. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:1467–1471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vercellini P, Crosignani PG, Somigliana E, Berlanda N, Barbara G, Fedele L (2009) Medical treatment for rectovaginal endometriosis: what is the evidence? Hum Reprod 24:2504–2514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Slack A, Child T, Lindsey I, Kennedy S, Cunningham C, Mortensen N, Koninckx P, McVeigh E (2007) Urological and colorectal complications following surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis. BJOG 114:1278–1282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maytham G, Dowson H, Levy B, Kent A, Rockall T (2010) Laparoscopic excision of rectovaginal endometriosis: report of a prospective study and review of the literature. Colorectal Dis 12(11):1105–1112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsuzaki S, Houlle C, Botchorishvili R, Pouly JL, Mage G, Canis M (2009) Excision of the posterior vaginal fornix is necessary to ensure complete resection of rectovaginal endometriotic nodules of more than 2 cm in size. Fertil Steril 91:1314–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Darai E, Thomassin I, Barranger E, Detchev R, Cortez A, Houry S, Bazot M (2005) Feasibility and clinical outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:394–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Darai E, Ackerman G, Bazot M, Rouzier R, Dubernard G (2007) Laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis: limits and complications. Surg Endosc 21:1572–1577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Benbara A, Fortin A, Martin B, Palazzo L, Le Tohic A, Madelenat P, Yazbeck C (2008) Surgical and functional results of rectosigmoidal resection for severe endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 36:1191–1201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrero S, Anserini P, Abbamonte LH, Ragni N, Camerini G, Remorgida V (2009) Fertility after bowel resection for endometriosis. Fertil Steril 92:41–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohr C, Nezhat FR, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat CR (2005) Fertility considerations in laparoscopic treatment of infiltrative bowel endometriosis. JSLS 9:16–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cornillie FJ, Oosterlynck D, Lauweryns JM, Koninckx PR (1990) Deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis: histology and clinical significance. Fertil Steril 53:978–983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Koninckx PR, Martin DC (1992) Deep endometriosis: a consequence of infiltration or retraction or possibly adenomyosis externa? Fertil Steril 58:924–928

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vercellini P, Frontino G, Pietropaolo G, Gattei U, Daguati R, Crosignani PG (2004) Deep endometriosis: definition, pathogenesis, and clinical management. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:153–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright JT (2000) The diagnosis and management of infiltrating nodular recto-vaginal endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 12:283–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwok A, Lam A, Ford R (2001) Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: implications, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol Surv 56:168–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobson TZ, Barlow DH, Garry R, Koninckx P (2001) Laparoscopic surgery for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001300

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chapron C, Jacob S, Dubuisson JB, Vieira M, Liaras E, Fauconnier A (2001) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal management of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectovaginal septum. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:349–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mangler M, Loddenkemper C, Lanowska M, Bartley J, Schneider A, Köhler C (2008) Histopathology-based combined surgical approach to rectovaginal endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 103:59–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruffo G, Scopelliti F, Scioscia M, Ceccaroni M, Mainardi P, Minelli L (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: analysis of 436 cases. Surg Endosc 24:63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koh CH, Janik GM (2002) The surgical management of deep rectovaginal endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:357–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Redwine DB (1991) Conservative laparoscopic excision of endometriosis by sharp dissection: life table analysis of reoperation and persistent or recurrent disease. Fertil Steril 56:628–634

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Bettoni G, Gotsch F (2004) Long-term follow-up after conservative surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1020–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ford J, English J, Miles WA, Giannopoulos T (2004) Pain, quality of life and complications following the radical resection of rectovaginal endometriosis. BJOG 111:353–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burke P, Mealy K, Gillen P, Joyce W, Traynor O, Hyland J (1994) Requirement for bowel preparation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 81:907–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Miettinen RP, Laitinen ST, Mäkelä JT, Pääkkönen ME (2000) Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:669–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Muzii L, Angioli R, Zullo MA, Calcagno M, Panici PB (2003) Bowel preparation for gynecological surgery. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 48:311–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Santos JC Jr, Batista J, Sirimarco MT, Guimarães AS, Levy CE (1994) Prospective randomized trial of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 81:1673–1676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Platell C, Hall J (1998) What is the role of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 41:875–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Possover M, Diebolder H, Plaul K, Schneider A (2000) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal resection of rectovaginal endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 96:304–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hollett-Caines J, Vilos GA, Penava DA (2003) Laparoscopic mobilization of the rectosigmoid and excision of the obliterated cul-de-sac. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:190–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

William Kondo, Nicolas Bourdel, Kris Jardon, Stefano Tamburro, Daniele Cavoli, Sachiko Matsuzaki, Revaz Botchorishvili, Benoit Rabischong, Jean L. Pouly, Gérard Mage, Michel Canis have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Kondo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kondo, W., Bourdel, N., Jardon, K. et al. Comparison between standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques for rectovaginal endometriosis. Surg Endosc 25, 2711–2717 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1635-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1635-z

Keywords

Navigation