Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Initial experience with robotic lung lobectomy: report of two different approaches

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical resection is the gold standard for treatment of early-stage lung tumors. Different minimally invasive approaches are currently under investigation: In addition to conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), robotic technology with the da Vinci System has emerged over the past 10 years.

Methods

In this series, 26 patients (12 women and 14 men; median age, 65 years) underwent a robotic lobectomy for early-stage lung tumors (clinical stage IA or IB) or centrally located metastases.

Results

The resected lobes included four left upper lobes, six left lower lobes, eight right upper lobes, and eight right lower lobes. Five intraoperative conversions to open thoracotomy were performed due to one major bleeding, two minor bleedings, one variant course of the pulmonary artery, and one extended resection. The postoperative complications included two prolonged air leaks, one colonic perforation, and one atrial fibrillation. The median hospital stay was 11 days (range, 7–53 days). One 30-day mortality (3.8%) occurred due to respiratory failure. The overall median operative time was 228 min (range, 162–375 min). For the first five patients, the posterior approach was used. Thereafter, the authors switched to an anterior approach, thus enabling an easier hilar dissection. Technical modification within this series also included the introduction of a new vessel sealing device.

Conclusion

Robotic lobectomy was proved to be feasible and safe in our initial series in a learning curve setting. Changes in patient positioning and approach as well as technical modifications resulted in shorter operative times. A longer follow-up period and randomized controlled trials are necessary to evaluate a potential benefit over open and conventional VATS approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manser R, Wright G, Hart D, Byrnes G, Campbell D (2005) Surgery for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD004699

  2. McKenna RJ (1994) Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery with mediastinal node sampling for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 107:879–881

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petersen RP, Pham D, Burfeind WR, Hanish SI, Toloza EM, Harpole DR, D’Amico TA (2007) Thoracoscopic lobectomy facilitates the delivery of chemotherapy after resection for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 83:1245–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grogan EL, Jones DR (2008) VATS lobectomy is better than open thoracotomy: what is the evidence for short-term outcomes? Thorac Surg Clin 18:249–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Whitson BA, Groth SS, Duval SJ, Swanson SJ, Maddaus MA (2008) Surgery for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 86:2016–2018

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC (2009) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2553–2562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rocco G, Internullo E, Cassivi SD, Van Raemdonck D, Ferguson MK (2008) The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections. Thorac Surg Clin 18:235–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dieter RA, Kuzycz GB (1997) Complications and contraindications of thoracoscopy. Int Surg 82:232–239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bodner J, Wykypiel H, Wetscher G, Schmid T (2004) First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:844–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Melfi FM, Mussi A (2008) Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thorac Surg Clin 18:289–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, Tempesta B (2008) Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 85:1880–1885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Swanson SJ, Herndon JE II, D’Amico TA, Demmy TL, McKenna RJ Jr, Green MR, Sugarbaker DJ (2007) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802: a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol 25:4993–4997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McKenna RJ (2008) Complications and learning curves for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:275–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A, Udo J, Brölmann H, Kennedy RH, John H (2009) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23:438–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Augustin F, Schmid T, Bodner J (2006) The robotic approach for mediastinal lesions. Int J Med Robot 2:262–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Argenziano M, Katz M, Bonatti J, Srivastava S, Murphy D, Poirier R, Loulmet D, Siwek L, Kreaden U, Ligon D, Trial Investigators TECAB (2006) Results of the prospective multicenter trial of robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 81:1666–1674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmid T (2002) Editorial. Eur Surg 34:155–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park BJ, Flores RM, Rusch VW (2006) Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:54–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Solaini L, Prusciano F, Bagioni P, di Francesco F, Solaini L, Poddie DB (2008) Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the lung: analysis of intraoperative and postoperative complications over 15 years and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 22:298–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Amico TA (2008) Long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:259–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bodner J, Wykypiel H, Greiner A, Kirchmayr W, Freund MC, Margreiter R, Schmid T (2004) Early experience with robot-assisted surgery for mediastinal masses. Ann Thorac Surg 78:259–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bodner JC, Zitt M, Ott H, Wetscher GJ, Wykypiel H, Lucciarini P, Schmid T (2005) Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for benign and malignant esophageal tumors. Ann Thorac Surg 80:1202–1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ishikawa N, Sun YS, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR, Oda M, Ohta Y, Watanabe G (2006) Thoracoscopic robot-assisted bronchoplasty. Surg Endosc 20:1782–1783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Florian Augustin, Johannes Bodner, Heinz Wykypiel, and Christoph Schwinghammer and have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Augustin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Augustin, F., Bodner, J., Wykypiel, H. et al. Initial experience with robotic lung lobectomy: report of two different approaches. Surg Endosc 25, 108–113 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1138-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1138-3

Keywords

Navigation