Skip to main content
Log in

A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The optimal management of patients with concomitant common bile duct stones and gallstones is still evolving. With the introduction of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, many centers prefer single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration over preoperative endoscopic bile duct clearance followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The present study was done to compare these two management options.

Patients and methods

30 patients with symptomatic gallstones and common bile duct stones were randomized to either treatment option. Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or magnetic resonance pancreaticography (MRCP) was done in all patients to confirm the diagnosis. In group I, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration was done at the same sitting; in group II, endoscopic stone clearance was followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy 4–6 weeks later. Success was defined as successful treatment by the intended modality.

Results

15 patients were randomized to each group and the two groups had comparable demographic and clinical profile. In group I there was a success rate of 93.5% in comparison with 86.7% in group II (p = 0.32, Fisher’s exact test). The complications were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

The results showed equivalent success rate in terms of morbidity and hospital stay. Laparoscopic approach seems to be favorable because of the smaller number of procedures and hospital visits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freitas ML, Bell RL, Duffy AJ (2006) Choledocholithiasis: evolving standards for diagnosis and management. World J Gastroenterol 12:3162–3167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stroker ME (1995) Common bile duct exploration in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 130:265–268

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lacitignola S, Minardi M (2008) Management of common bile duct stones: A ten-year experience at a Tertiary Care Center. JSLS 12:62–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13:952–957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers S, Cello JP, Horn JK, Siperstein A, Campbell A, Mackersie R (1999) Randomized controlled clinical trial of laproscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC+LCBDE) vs ERCP sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP/S+LC) for common bile duct stone disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 14(Suppl):S110

    Google Scholar 

  6. Petelin JB (2003) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: lessons learned from >12 years’ experience. Surg Endosc 17:1705–1715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Sarnari J, De Sanctis A, Ambrosio GD, Lezoche G, Lezoche E (2005) Long-term results after laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 19:705–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berci G, Morgenstern L (1994) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: a multi-institutional SAGES study. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 8:1168–1174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sgourakis G, Karaliotas K (2002) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study. Minerva Chir 57:467–474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miletic D, Uravic M, Mazur-Brbac M, Stimac D, Petranovic D, Sestan B (2006) Role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of bile duct lithiasis. World J Surg 30:1705–1712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karakan T, Cindoruk M, Alagozlu H, Ergun M, Dumlu S, Unal S (2009) EUS versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 69:244–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perry KA, Myers JA, Deziel DJ (2008) Laparoscopic ultrasound as the primary method for bile duct imaging during cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 22:208–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. de Vries A, Donkervoor SC, van Geloven AAW, Pierik EGJM (2005) Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Does the time interval matter? Surg Endosc 19:996–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:003327

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tranter SE, Thompson MH (2002) Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89:1495–1504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garg PK, Tandon RK, Ahuja V, Makharia GK, Batra Y (2004) Predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic clearance of large bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 59:601–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, Norton S, Thompson M (2009) A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19:713–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Authors Drs. Virinder Bansal, Mahesh Misra, Pramod Garg, and Manik Prabhu have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virinder K. Bansal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bansal, V.K., Misra, M.C., Garg, P. et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24, 1986–1989 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0891-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0891-7

Keywords

Navigation