Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is a bougie required for the performance of the fundal wrap during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

It has been claimed that oesophageal intubation with a bougie during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) reduces the risk of a tight crural repair and wrap, and thereby decreases the prevalence of post-operative dysphagia. The aim of this study is to assess the benefit of routinely inserting a bougie during LNF, in relation to post-operative dysphagia.

Methods

All patients who underwent LNF by a single surgeon between March 2005 and March 2007 were reviewed. Oesophageal intubation during surgery was routinely performed in all patients who underwent LNF during the first 11 months of the study period, whilst during the second phase, routine oesophageal intubation was not performed. The main outcome measures were the prevalence of post-operative dysphagia and complication rates. Dysphagia severity was assessed clinically by a scoring system at discharge, and again at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year.

Results

Forty patients had a bougie inserted (group 1) and 42 had no bougie (group 2). The mean age was 49.1 (SD, standard deviation ± 8.1) years in group 1 and 49.4 (SD ± 8.4) years in group 2 (p = 0.88). There were no major complications. When assessed at 12 weeks, 60% of group 1 and 51% of group 2 patients still had some degree of dysphagia (p = 0.635) but by 1 year dysphagia had resolved in all patients (p = 1.00). There was no significant difference in the median dysphagia scores between the two groups at: discharge (p = 0.181), 6 weeks (p = 0.234), 12 weeks (p = 0.504), 24 weeks (p = 0.182) or 1 year (p = 0.530). Analysis of the progression of dysphagia over the first post-operative year using Cox regression analysis did not show any significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.375).

Conclusions

LNF can be safely performed without the routine use of an oesophageal bougie and this practice does not result in increased post-operative dysphagia rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nebel OT, Fornes MF, Castell DO (1976) Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: incidence and precipitating factors. Am J Dig Dis 21:953–956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Watson DI, Jamieson GG (1998) Antireflux surgery in the laparoscopic era. Br J Surg 85:1173–1184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wetscher GJ, Glaser K, Wieschemeyer T et al (1997) Tailored antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: effectiveness and risk of post-operative dysphagia. World J Surg 21:605–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Kestens PJ (1996) Reoperation for unsatisfactory outcome after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Dis Esoph 9:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Meester TR, Bonavina L, Albertucci M (1986) Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 204:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Meester TR, Stein HJ (1992) Minimizing the side effects of antireflux surgery. World J Surg 16:335–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schauer PR, Meyers WC, Eubanks S, Norem RF, Franklin M, Pappas TN (1996) Mechanisms of gastric and oesophageal perforations during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Ann Surg 223:43–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lowham AS, Filipi CJ, Hinder RA et al (1996) Mechanisms and avoidance of esophageal perforation by anaesthesia personnel during laparoscopic foregut surgery. Surg Endosc 10:979–982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patterson EJ, Herron DM, Hansen PD et al (2000) Effect of esophageal bougie on the incidence of dysphagia following Nissen fundoplication. Arch Surg 135:1055–1061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herron DM, Swanstrom LL, Ramzi N, Hansen PD (1999) Factors predictive of dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 13:1180–1183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nissen R (1956) Eine einfache operation zur beeinflussung der refluxoesophagitis. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 86:590–592

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Toupet A (1963) Technique d’oesophago-gastroplastie avec phrenogastropexie appliqué dans la cure radicale des hernies hiatales et comme complement de l’operation d’heller dans les cardiospasmes. Med Acad Chir 89:374–379

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lundell L, Abrahamsson H, Ruth M et al (1996) Long-term results of a prospective randomised comparison of total fundic wrap (Nissen–Rossetti) or semifundoplication (Toupet) for gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 83:830–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hagedorn C, Lonroth H, Rydberg L et al (2002) Long-term efficacy of total (Nissen-Rossetti) and posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication: results of a randomised controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg 6:540–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Pike GK et al (1999) A prospective randomised double blind trial between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and anterior partial fundoplication. Br J Surg 86:123–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ludemann R, Watson DI, Devitt PG et al (2005) Laparoscopic total versus anterior 180 degree fundoplication–five year follow-up of a prospective randomised trial. Br J Surg 92:240–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Callery MP, Czerniach DR, Kelly JJ, Litwin DEM (2002) Is the use of a bougie necessary for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Arch Surg 137:402–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Watson DI, Pike GK, Baigrie RJ et al (1997) Prospective double blind randomised trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with division and without division of short gastric vessels. Ann Surg 226:642–652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Royal Gwent Hospital, Cardiff road, NP20-2UB, Newport, UK

    Krishnamurthy Somasekar

  2. Department of Surgery, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK

    Gareth Morris-Stiff

  3. Division of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, UK

    Hasan Al-Madfai

  4. Department of Surgery, Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend, UK

    Karen Barton & Ahmed Hassn

Authors
  1. Krishnamurthy Somasekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gareth Morris-Stiff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hasan Al-Madfai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Karen Barton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ahmed Hassn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishnamurthy Somasekar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Somasekar, K., Morris-Stiff, G., Al-Madfai, H. et al. Is a bougie required for the performance of the fundal wrap during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication?. Surg Endosc 24, 390–394 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0592-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0592-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation