Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1,000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We consider quality of surgery throughout the learning curve and attempt to determine the learning curve for competency in performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Methods

The study included 1,014 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection between June 1996 and December 2007. We categorized patients into nine periods according to number of cases performed.

Results

Operative time continuously decreased for right hemicolectomy (216 versus 150 min) and anterior resection (214.8 versus 147.7 min), whereas for low anterior resection it did not change over many periods and then significantly decreased after the ninth period (221.3 versus 176.4 min). The proportion of patients who had undergone previous abdominal surgery increased after the second period. Anastomotic leakage rate was 6–9% for the first 200 cases, and then decreased to less than 2%. More than 10% of operations were converted to open surgery during the first period, after which this rate significantly decreased to 2%. Number of harvested lymph nodes stabilized to 35–40 for right hemicolectomy after 200 cases, whereas for anterior and low anterior resection it was consistently 15–20 after the initial 20 cases. Overall, disease recurrence rate was 16–25%. For rectal cancer, local recurrence rate was highest (12%) in the fourth period and decreased thereafter to about 3%.

Conclusion

Postoperative complications and local recurrence rate increased even after accumulation of experience because of expansion of indications for laparoscopic procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregorie R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Larach SW, Patankar SK, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Perozo SE, Lord AS (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis and comparison of early vs. later experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40:592–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wishner JD, Baker JW Jr, Hoffman GC, Hubbard GW 2nd, Gould RJ, Wohlgemuth SD, Ruffin WK, Melick CF (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy: the learning curve. Surg Endosc 9:1179–1183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dinçler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Agachan F, Joo JS, Sher M, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (1997) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11:331–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers DA, Elstein AS, Bordage G (2001) Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery. Ann Surg 233:159–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM (1995) What is the learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy? Am Surg 61:681–685

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Agachan F, Joo JS, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (1996) Intraoperative laparoscopic complications: are we getting better? Dis Colon Rectum 39(Suppl):S14–S19

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Adams J, Beart RW Jr (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132:41–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N (1999) Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective. BMJ 318:887–888

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Köhler L, Bärlehner E, Köckerling F, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T, Martinez S, Chen W, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2002) Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 16:855–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pandya S, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Rusin LC (1999) Laparoscopic colectomy: indications for conversion to laparotomy. Arch Surg 134:471–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yong L, Deane M, Monson JR, Darzi A (2001) Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy. Surg Endosc 15:1431–1439

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moorthy K, Shaul T, Foley RJ (2004) Factors that predict conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for Crohn’s disease. Am J Surg 187:47–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawrence DM, Pasquale MD, Wasser TE (2003) Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Am Surg 69:499–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwandner O, Farke S, Bruch HP (2005) Laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is not associated with increased morbidity when compared with nondiverticular disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:165–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M, Secic M, Efron J, Belin B, Jain A, Wexner S (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 15:827–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L, Smith M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 18:281–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S, Schicke B (2005) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 19:757–766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G, Salval M, Brachet Contul R, Garrone C (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237:335–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C, Mahajna A (2005) Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer: long-term outcome. Surg Endosc 19:1468–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Delgado S, Momblan D, Salvador L, Bravo R, Castells A, Ibarzabal A, Piqué JM, Lacy AM (2004) Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients: lessons learned from >200 patients. Surg Endosc 18:1457–1462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ, Conley B, Cooper HS, Hamilton SR, Hammond ME, Henson DE, Hutter RV, Nagle RB, Nielsen ML, Sargent DJ, Taylor CR, Welton M, Willett C (2000) Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:979–994

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Park JS, Kang SB, Kim SW, Cheon GN (2007) Economics and the laparoscopic surgery learning curve comparison with open surgery for rectosigmoid cancer. World J Surg 31:1827–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Greene FLP, Page DL, Fleming ID (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia, PA, pp 107–117

  28. Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A, Francioni G, Accarpio G, Anfossi A, Ballario E, Becchi G, Bonilauri S, Carobbi A, Cavaliere P, Garcea D, Giuliani L, Morziani E, Mosca F, Mussa A, Pasqualini M, Poddie D, Tonetti F, Zardo L, Rosso R (2002) Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg 235:458–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Caplin S, Cerottini JP, Bosman FT, Constanda MT, Givel JC (1998) For patients with Dukes’ B (TNM stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer 83:666–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyu-Seog Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, I.J., Choi, GS., Lim, KH. et al. Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1,000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 23, 839–846 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0259-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0259-4

Keywords

Navigation