Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Milestones in endoscope design for minimally invasive urologic surgery: the sentinel role of a pioneer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endoscopically based techniques have revolutionized the entire field of surgical specialties over the past 50 years. Currently, minimal access surgery is commonplace for considerable segments of surgical procedures across specialty lines. Central to this revolution, and arguably foremost in its impact on the development of minimally invasive endoscopic surgery, was the development of the rod–lens optical system by Professor Harold H. Hopkins and the almost simultaneous development of the fiberoptic cold-light light source by Karl Storz. It was George Berci who acted as the catalyst in bringing these two men together in the early 1960s, and from that meeting ensued one of the most successful cooperations in the design of endoscopic equipment. Innovative surgeons quickly recognized the enormous potential of these inventions, and in this context, George Berci’s work and vision provided the hallmark events leading to the clinical applications from which surgeons and their patients so greatly benefit currently. In urology, Berci’s early work has been recognized as a sentinel event bringing endoscopic endoluminal surgery from the lower urinary tract (urethra, bladder, prostate) to the upper urinary tract (ureter, kidney), and eventually to extraluminal laparoendoscopic surgery. This work has been recognized by the Journal of Urology as a “milestone in urology” leading to the clinical application in the field of endoscopic surgery currently referred to as endourology. In this article, the current state-of-the-art urologic surgery for the management of stone disease, urologic tumors, and anatomic abnormalities is presented, which to a great extent has its roots in George Berci’s contributions to the field of innovative endoscope design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Linder TE, Simmen D, Stool SE (1997) Revolutionary inventions in the 20th century: the history of endoscopy. Arch Otolaryngol Surg 123: 1161–1163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cockett WS, Cockett AT (1998) The Hopkins rod–lens system and the Storz cold light illumination system. J Urol 51: 1–2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berci G, Cuschieri A (1996) Karl Storz 19111996: a remembrance. Surg Endosc 10: 1123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kont LA, Berci G (1967) A comparative assessment of optical and fibre gastroscopes. Med And Biol Illustr 17: 1810–1190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berci G, Kont LA (1969) A new optical system in endoscopy with special reference to cystoscopy. Brit J Urol 41: 564

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shore JM, Shore E (1970) Operative biliary endoscopy: experience with the flexible choledochoscope in 100 consecutive choledocholithotomies. Ann Surg 171: 269

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vatz A, Berci G, Shore J, Manny, Kudish, H, Nemoy N (1972) Operative nephroscopy. J Urol 107: 355–357 (Reprinted as “Milestone in urology.” J Urol 168: 1914–1916, 2002)

  8. Shore JM, Morgenstern L, Berci G (1971) An improved rigid choledochoscope. Am J. Surg 122: 567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berci G, Getzoff PL, Kont LA (1970) An improved concept in optics applied to cystoscopy. J Urol 104: 542–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Panish J, Berci G (1972) The potential of a zoom lens system in fiber endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 18: 125–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berci G (1972) Endoscopy today: 1. Rigid endoscopes. Postgrad Med 51: 64–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berci G (1972) Endoscopy today: 2. Flexible fiber endoscopes. Postgrad Med 51: 111–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berci G, Phillips EH, Fujita F (2003) The operating room of the future: what, when, and why? Surg Endosc 18: 1–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bagley DH, Huffman JL, Lyon ES (1987) Flexible ureteropyeloscopy: diagnosis and treatment in the upper urinary tract. J Urol 138: 280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bagley DH (1988) Ureteropyeloscopy with flexible fiberoptic instruments. In: Huffman JL, Bagley DH, Lyon ES (eds) Ureteroscopy. WB Saunders, Philadelphia pp 131–155

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fuchs GJ, David RD (1989) Flexible ureteroscopy, dilatation of narrow caliceal neck, and ESWL: a new minimally invasive approach to stones in caliceal diverticula. J Endourol 3: 255

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fuchs A, Fuchs G (1990) Retrograde intrarenal surgery for calculus disease: new minimally invasive treatment approach. J Endourol 4: 337–347

    Google Scholar 

  18. Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, Macaluso JN, McCullough DL (1994) Nephrolithiasis clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of staghorn calculi. J Urol 151: 1648

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel A, Fuchs G (1997) Expanding the horizons of shockwave lithotripsy through adjunctive use of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): new techniques and indications. J Endourol 11: 33–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Segura JH, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Williams HJ Jr, Barrett DM, Benson RC, May GR, Bender CE (1985) Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases. J Urol 134: 1077

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fuchs GJ, Yurkanin JP (2005) Retrograde endoscopic treatment of renal stones: indications and technique of retrograde intrarenal surgery. In: Moore RG, Bischoff JT, Loening S, Docimo SG (eds) Minimally invasive urologic surgery. Taylor & Francis, London and New York pp 449–478

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zeltser IS, Grasso M, Bagley DH (2005) Endoscopic management of ureteral stones. In: Moore RG, Bischoff JT, Loening S, Docimo SG (eds) Minimally invasive urologic surgery. Taylor & Francis, London and New York pp 479–492

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gretzer MB, Partin AW, Chan DY (2005) Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatis hyperplasia (BPH). In: Moore RG, Bischoff JT, Loening S, Docimo SG (eds) Minimally invasive urologic surgery. Taylor & Francis, London and New York, pp 352–373

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kang YM, Fuchs GJ, Ng CS (2006) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Contemp Urol 18: 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez-Pineiro JA, Garcia Matres MJ, Martinez-Pineiro L (1996) Endourological management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: analysis of a series of 59 tumors. J Urol 156: 377–385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Portic AJ, Kavoussi LR (2001) Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Urology 57: 448–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, Murphy DP, Sung GT, Novick AC (2002) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol 167: 469–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sung GT, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK, Gill IS, Desai MM (2001) Laparoscopic renal cryoablation in 50 patients: intermediate follow-up. J Urol 165: 158

    Google Scholar 

  29. Harada J, Dohi M, Mogami T, Fukuda K, Miki K, Futura N, Kishimoto K, Simizu T, Miyasaka K (2001) Initial experience of percutaneous renal cryosurgery under the guidance of a horizontal open MRI system. Radiat Med 19: 291–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rendon RA, Kachura JR, Sweet JM, Gertner MR, Sherar MD, Robinette M, Tsihlias J, Trachtenberg J, Sampson H, Jewett MA (2002) The uncertainty of radiofrequency treatment of renal cell carcinoma: findings at immediate and delayed nephrectomy. J Urol 167: 1587–1592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR (1999) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the four-year Johns Hopkins University experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14: 2090–2093

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Terachi T, Matsuda T, Terai A, Ogawa O, Kakehi Y, Kawakita M, Shichiri Y, Mikami O, Takeuchi H, Okada Y, Yoshida O (1997) Transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: experience in 100 patients. J Endourol 11: 361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Janetschek G (2001) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urol Clin North Am 28: 107–114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guillonneau B, El-Fettouh H, Baumert H, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Fromont G, Vallencien G (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsoris Institute. J Urol 169: 1261–1266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Berci G, Schwaitzberg SD (2002) The importance of understanding the basics of imaging in the era of high-tech endoscopy. Surg Endosc 16: 377

    Google Scholar 

  36. Berci G, Schwaitzberg SD (2002) The importance of understanding the basics of imaging in the era of high-tech endoscopy: part II. Surg Endosc 16: 1518–1522

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaplan MB, Ward DS, Berci G (2002) A new video laryngoscope: an aid to intubation and teaching. J Clin Anesth 14: 620–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. J. Fuchs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuchs, G.J. Milestones in endoscope design for minimally invasive urologic surgery: the sentinel role of a pioneer. Surg Endosc 20 (Suppl 2), S493–S499 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0078-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0078-4

Keywords

Navigation