Abstract
Background
Although the advantages of epidural anesthesia in open surgery have been established, its usefulness in the setting of laparoscopic surgery remains to be studied.
Methods
Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for infertility were randomly administered epidural anesthesia (group A, n = 11) or general anesthesia (group B, n = 9). The operation was performed under 4 mmHg pneumoperitoneum and in the 20° Trendelenburg position. Respiratory function tests using a spirometer and blood gas analysis were performed during the intra- or perioperative period. Pain status was evaluated with visual analog scale scoring. The number of postoperative recovery days needed to resume daily activities was obtained by a questionnaire.
Results
Respiratory rate, minute volume, PaCO2, % vital capacity (VC), and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) % were virtually constant throughout the study period in group A, whereas %VC was decreased immediately after operation in group B (p < 0.05). Minute volume immediately after operation was significantly increased in group B compared with group A (p < 0.01), suggesting shallow respiration in women undergoing general anesthesia. Observed pain scores on abdominal pain, shoulder pain, and dyspnea were very low during operation in group A. Pain scores immediately and 3 h after operation were also minimal in group A, whereas abdominal pain scores at these points were significantly higher in group B than those in group A (both p < 0.01). The number of days required for a half reduction in wound pain, trotting, and full recuperation for group A were less than those for group B (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Epidural anesthesia, when used in laparoscppic surgery for infertility treatment, has advantages over general anesthesia in terms of analgesic effects, postoperative respiratory function, and a return to preoperative daily activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J Ali RD Weisel AB Layug BJ Kripke HB Hechtman (1974) ArticleTitleConsequences of postoperative alterations in respiratory mechanics. Am J Surg 128 376–382 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSqD3cfjtlA%3D Occurrence Handle4606381
LD Bridenbaugh RM Soderstrom (1979) ArticleTitleLumbar epidural block anesthesia for outpatient laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 23 85–86 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi%2BD38bjvVw%3D Occurrence Handle158650
PR Bromage E Camporesi D Chestnut (1980) ArticleTitleEpidural narcotics for postoperative analgesia. Anesth Anal 59 473–480 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi%2BB28zlt1E%3D
MJ Ciofolo F Clergue J Seebacher G Lefebvre P Viars (1990) ArticleTitleVentilatory effects of laparoscopy under epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 70 357–361 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BC1MnmtVQ%3D Occurrence Handle2138437
DB Craig (1981) ArticleTitlePostoperative recovery of pulmonary function. Anesth Analg 60 46–52 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi6C3cjls1U%3D Occurrence Handle7006464
RJ Cuschieri CG Morran JC Howie CS McArdle (1985) ArticleTitlePostoperative pain and pulmonary complications: comparison of three analgesic regimens. Br J Surg 72 495–498 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqB2MzmsV0%3D Occurrence Handle4016522
M Ellstrom MF Olsen JH Olsson G Nordberg A Bengtsson M Hahlin (1998) ArticleTitlePain and pulmonary function following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77 923–928 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770909.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FitlGltQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9808381
A Gottschalk DS Smith (2001) ArticleTitleNew concepts in acute pain therapy: preemptive analgesia. Am Fam Physician 63 1979–1984 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzhsFyntQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11388713
DG Lewis W Ryder N Burn JT Wheldon D Tacchi (1972) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy—an investigation during spontaneous ventilation with halothane. Br J Anaesth 44 685–691 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSyD3c7gvFM%3D Occurrence Handle4262615
DR Lister B Rudston-Brown CB Warriner J McEwen M Chan KR Walley (1994) ArticleTitleCarbon dioxide absorption is not linearly related to intraperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation pressure in pigs. Anesthesiology 80 129–136 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC387isFI%3D Occurrence Handle8291701
M Luchetti R Palomba G Sica G Massa R Tufano (1996) ArticleTitleEffectiveness and safety of combined epidural and general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Reg Anesth 21 465–469 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2M7islU%3D Occurrence Handle8896010
S Odeberg O Ljungqvist T Svenberg P Gannedahl M Backdahl A Rosen Particlevon A Sollevi (1994) ArticleTitleHaemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum and the influence of posture during anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 38 276–283 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB1MrjvVY%3D Occurrence Handle8023669
MA Ramsay TM Savege BR Simpson R Goodwin (1974) ArticleTitleControlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J 2 656–659 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSuB28njvFE%3D Occurrence Handle4835444
N Rawal U Sjostrand E Christoffersson B Dahlstrom A Arvill H Rydman (1984) ArticleTitleComparison of intramuscular and epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia in the grossly obese: influence on postoperative ambulation and pulmonary function. Anesth Analg 63 583–592 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiuB38bjtVc%3D Occurrence Handle6233917
DB Scott KB Slawson (1968) ArticleTitleRespiratory effects of prolonged Trendelenburg position. Br J Anesth 40 103–107 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCeC1MjitVI%3D
FW Sydow (1989) ArticleTitleThe influence of anesthesia and postoperative analgesic management of lung function. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 550 159–165 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaB38vptl0%3D Occurrence Handle2652967
BJ Volicer (1978) ArticleTitleHospital stress and patient reports of pain and physical status. J Hum Stress 4 28–37 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSeC1Mrit1A%3D
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuramochi, K., Osuga, Y., Yano, T. et al. Usefulness of epidural anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery for infertility in comparison to general anesthesia. Surg Endosc 18, 847–851 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8227-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8227-5