Abstract
Background: After laparoscopic surgery (LS), patients show faster recovery of intestinal transit than after conventional open surgery (OS). To prove the mechanism of this advantage, we compared the recovery of intestinal transit using steel carbon balls. Methods: Rats underwent either open laparotomy or were insufflated with carbon dioxide followed by the administration of steel balls (0.6 mm). An abdominal radiograph was taken 12 h after the operation. Compliance of the intestinal walls was analyzed with a computer-driven barostat device. Results: An abdominal radiograph of 12 h after administration of the steel carbon balls showed the balls scattered in the small and large intestine of the LS patients, whereas they remained mostly in the stomach of the OS patients. Compliance of the intestinal walls was sustained at approximately 100 µl/mmHg in the LS patients, whereas it dropped to 94 µl/mmHg in the OS patients with the increase in balloon pressure. Histologically, the extent of serosal edema was more severe in the OS than in the LS patients. In terms of intestinal transit and irritation LS has advantage over OS. Conclusions: Intestinal transit recovery, as measured by the migration of steel carbon balls, is faster in LS, and gastric emptying is slow in OS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B Bohm JW Milsom VW Fazio (1995) ArticleTitlePostoperative intestinal motility following conventional and laparoscopic intestinal surgery. Arch Surg 130 415–419 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB38rntlY%3D Occurrence Handle7710343
A Cuschieri (1992) ArticleTitleThe spectrum of laparoscopic surgery. World J Surg 16 1089–1097 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD1cfotFw%3D Occurrence Handle1455878
S Delgado AM Lacy X Filella A Castells JC Garcia-Valdecasas JM Pique D Momblan J Visa (2001) ArticleTitleAcute-phase response in laparoscopic and open colectomy in colon cancer: randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 44 638–646 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3msVeiug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11357021
M Friedrich D Rixecker G Fiedrich (1999) ArticleTitleEvaluation of stress-related hormones after surgery. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 26 71–75 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzovVOgsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10459440
SA Helmy MA Wahby M EI-Nawaway (1999) ArticleTitleThe effect of anaesthesia and surgery on plasma cytokine production. Anaesthesia 54 733–738 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00947.x Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXlvVOns7s%3D Occurrence Handle10460524
C Kuntz A Wunsch F Bay J Windeler F Glaser C Herfarth (1998) ArticleTitleProspective randomized study of stress and immune response after laparoscopic vs conventional colonic resection. Surg Endosc 12 963–967
SPY Kwok WY Lau PD Carey SB Kelly KL Leung AK Li (1996) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted large bowel excision for cancer. Ann Surg 223 170–l76 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199602000-00009 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC2srjs1I%3D Occurrence Handle8597511
I Le Blanc-Louvry A Coquerel E Koning C Maillot P Ducrotte (2000) ArticleTitleOperative stress response is reduced after laparoscopic compared to open cholecystectomy: the relationship with postoperative pain and ileus. Dig Dis Sci 45 1703–1713 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005598615307 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgtlOmug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11052308
KL Leung PB Lai RL Ho WC Meng RY Yiu JF Lee WY Lau (2000) ArticleTitleSystemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 231 506–511 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200004000-00008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3htlaitg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10749610
JRT Monson A Darzi PD Carey PJ Guillou (1992) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 340 831–833 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD38zhslQ%3D Occurrence Handle1357253
A Ozawa F Konishi H Nagai M Okada K Kanazawa (2000) ArticleTitleCytokine and hormonal responses in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy and conventional open colectomy. Surg Today 30 107–111 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005950050024 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhsF2ntbg%3D Occurrence Handle10664330
SS Rao NW Read C Brown CD Holdsworth (1987) ArticleTitleStudies on the mechanism of bowel disturbance in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 93 934–940 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieD3crmslc%3D Occurrence Handle3653643
W Schwenk C Jacobi U Mansmann B Bohm JM Muller (2000) ArticleTitleInflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 385 2–9 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004230050002 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jtFSluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10664112
PH Tung CD Smith (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic insufflation with room air causes exaggerated interleukin-6 responses. Surg Endosc 13 473–475 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901015 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ksVOmsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10227945
PJ van der Schaar CB Lamers AA Masclee (1999) ArticleTitleThe role of the barostat in human research and clinical practice. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 230 52–63 Occurrence Handle10.1080/003655299750025552 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvislyjuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10499463
FJ Vittimberga Jr DP Foley WC Meyers MP Callery (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Ann Surg 227 326–334 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199803000-00003 Occurrence Handle9527054
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takada, M., Fukumoto, S., Ichihara, T. et al. Comparison of intestinal transit recovery between laparoscopic and open surgery using a rat model . Surg Endosc 17, 1237–1240 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9213-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9213-z