Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What is the value of telerobotic technology in gastrointestinal surgery?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Although telerobotic technology has entered clinical application, its value for gastrointestinal surgery is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the performance characteristics of telerobotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TALC). Methods: All TALCs performed using the da Vinci Surgical System between January 2000 and September 2001 at a tertiary academic medical center were analyzed. Results: For this study, 20 patients (80% female) with a mean age of 47 ± 4 years underwent TALC. All had symptomatic cholelithiasis, and all had successful TALC results without complications or need for conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLP). The mean procedure time was 152 ± 8 min. The procedures were performed by one of three staff surgeons experienced in laparoscopic surgery who had training in telerobotic surgery. The perceived advantages of TALC over CLP included easier tissue dissection, enhanced dexterity, and stimulated interest in biliary surgery. The disadvantages included increased operating time and lack of tactile feedback. Conclusions: The TALC procedure is effective and safe when performed by appropriately trained surgeons. Telerobotic technology has the potential to reinvigorate gastrointestinal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I Baca (1997) ArticleTitleRobot arm in laparoscopic surgery. Chirurg 8 837–839 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001040050282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. SF Barrett CH Wright MR Jerath RS Lewis II BC Dillard HG Rylander III AJ Welch (1995) ArticleTitleAutomated retinal robotic laser system. Biomed Sci Instrum 31 89–93 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA1czmt1E%3D Occurrence Handle7654990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. G Brandt A Zimolong L Carrat P Merloz HW Staudte S Lavallee K Radermacher G Rau (1999) ArticleTitleCRIGOS: a compact robot for image-guided orthopedic surgery. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 4 252–260 Occurrence Handle10.1109/4233.809169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. GF Buess MO Schurr SC Fischer (2000) ArticleTitleRobotics and allied technologies in endoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 2 229–235 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.135.2.229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. GB Cadiere J Himpens M Vertruyen F Favretti (1999) ArticleTitleThe world’s first obesity surgery performed by a surgeon at a distance. Obes Surg 2 206–209 Occurrence Handle10.1381/096089299765553539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WK Cheah B Lee JE Lenzi PM Goh (2000) ArticleTitleTelesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy between two countries. Surg Endosc 11 1085

    Google Scholar 

  7. WR Chitwood Jr LW Nifong WH Chapman JE Felger BM Bailey T Ballint KG Mendleson VB Kim JA Young RA Albrecht (2001) ArticleTitleRobotic surgical training in an academic institution. Ann Surg 4 475–484 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200110000-00007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. RJ Damiano Jr HA Tabaie MJ Mack JR Edgerton C Mullangi WP Graper SM Prasad (2001) ArticleTitleInitial prospective multicenter clinical trial of robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 4 1263–1268 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02980-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E Hanisch B Markus C Gutt TC Schmandra A Encke (2001) ArticleTitleRobot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy and fundoplication: initial experiences with the Da Vinci system. Chirurg 3 286–288 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001040051307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. KT Kavanagh (1994) ArticleTitleApplications of image-directed robotics in otolaryngologic surgery. Laryngoscope 3 283–293

    Google Scholar 

  11. J Marescaux MK Smith D Folscher F Jamali B Malassagne J Leroy (2001) ArticleTitleTelerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial clinical experience with 25 patients. Ann Surg 1 8–9

    Google Scholar 

  12. H Margossian T Falcone (2001) ArticleTitleRobotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and adnexal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 3 161–165 Occurrence Handle10.1089/10926420152389314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. DD Meininger C Byhahn K Heller CN Gutt K Westphal (2001) ArticleTitleTotally endoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a robotic system in a child. Surg Endosc 11 1360A–1360

    Google Scholar 

  14. WS Melvin BJ Needleman KR Krause RK Wolf RE Michler EC Ellison (2001) ArticleTitleComputer-assisted robotic heller myotomy: initial case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 4 251–253 Occurrence Handle10.1089/109264201750539790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S Okada Y Tanaba H Sugawara H Yamauchi S Ishimori S Satoh (2000) ArticleTitleThoracoscopic major lung resection for primary lung cancer by a single surgeon with a voice-controlled robot and an instrument retraction system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2 414–415 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mtc.2000.107205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. AW Partin JB Adams RG Moore LR Kavoussi (1995) ArticleTitleComplete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 6 552–557

    Google Scholar 

  17. RM Satava (1999) ArticleTitleEmerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century. Arch Surg 134 1197–1202 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.134.11.1197 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fit1Gmuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10555633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. RM Satava JC Bowersox M Mack TM Krummel (2001) ArticleTitle. Contemp Surg 10 489–499

    Google Scholar 

  19. M Siemionow K Ozer W Siemionow G Lister (2000) ArticleTitleRobotic assistance in microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 8 643–649 Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2000-9383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. RF Young (1987) ArticleTitleApplication of robotics to stereotactic neurosurgery. Neurol Res 2 123–128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery and Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA

    A. Perez, M. J. Zinner, S. W. Ashley, D. C. Brooks & E. E. Whang

Authors
  1. A. Perez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. J. Zinner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. W. Ashley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. C. Brooks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. E. E. Whang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. E. Whang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perez, A., Zinner, M., Ashley, S. et al. What is the value of telerobotic technology in gastrointestinal surgery? . Surg Endosc 17, 811–813 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8561-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8561-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation