Skip to main content
Log in

Weighted Lattice Point Sums in Lattice Polytopes, Unifying Dehn–Sommerville and Ehrhart–Macdonald

  • Published:
Discrete & Computational Geometry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let V be a real vector space of dimension n and let \(M\subset V\) be a lattice. Let \(P\subset V\) be an n-dimensional polytope with vertices in M, and let \(\varphi :V\rightarrow {\mathbb {C}}\) be a homogeneous polynomial function of degree d. For \(q\in {\mathbb {Z}}_{>0}\) and any face F of P, let \(D_{\varphi ,F} (q)\) be the sum of \(\varphi \) over the lattice points in the dilate qF. We define a generating function \(G_{\varphi }(q,y) \in {\mathbb {Q}}[q] [y]\) packaging together the various \(D_{\varphi ,F} (q)\), and show that it satisfies a functional equation that simultaneously generalizes Ehrhart–Macdonald reciprocity and the Dehn–Sommerville relations. When P is a simple lattice polytope (i.e., each vertex meets n edges), we show how \(G_{\varphi }\) can be computed using an analogue of Brion–Vergne’s Euler–Maclaurin summation formula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This (standard) definition of the f polynomial is dual to the definition of the h-polynomial (1). The f-polynomial favors simplicial polytopes, in that Dehn–Sommerville holds with no g-polynomial corrections. The h-polynomial, on the other hand, favors simple polytopes.

  2. We remark that the factor \((y+1)^{\deg {\varphi }}\) is not really needed for \(G_{\varphi }\), at least as far as the results in this section are concerned. This factor appears naturally when one considers the Todd operator formula, so it is reasonable to include it here.

  3. This condition is the same as the toric variety \(X_{P}\) determined by P being nonsingular [8].

  4. With this convention the Bernoulli numbers are \(B_{0} = 1\), \(B_{1}=\frac{1}{2}\), \(B_{2}=\frac{1}{6}\), \(B_{4}=-\frac{1}{30}\), ..., and \(B_{2k-1}=0\) for \(k > 1\). Note that for many authors \(B_{1}=-\frac{1}{2}\).

  5. We thank an anonymous referee for pointing this out to us.

References

  1. Beck, M., Robins, S.: Computing the Continuous Discretely: Integer-Point Enumeration in Polyhedra. 2nd edn. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York (2015). http://math.sfsu.edu/beck/ccd.html

  2. Brasselet, J.-P., Schürmann, J., Yokura, S.: Hirzebruch classes and motivic Chern classes for singular spaces. J. Topol. Anal. 2(1), 1–55 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Brion, M., Vergne, M.: An equivariant Riemann–Roch theorem for complete, simplicial toric varieties. J. Reine Angew. Math. 482, 67–92 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Brion, M., Vergne, M.: Lattice points in simple polytopes. J. Am. Math. Soc. 10(2), 371–392 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Brion, M., Vergne, M.: Residue formulae, vector partition functions and lattice points in rational polytopes. J. Am. Math. Soc. 10(4), 797–833 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox, D.A., Little, J.B., Schenck, H.K.: Toric Varieties. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrhart, E.: Sur les polyèdres rationnels homothétiques à \(n\) dimensions. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 254, 616–618 (1962)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fulton, W.: Introduction to Toric Varieties. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 131. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Goda, K., Kamimura, S., Ohmoto, T.: \({T}_y\)-operator on integrals over lattice polytopes (2012). http://www.math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~ohmoto/Papers/t_y_polytope.pdf

  10. Hirzebruch, F.: Eulerian polynomials. Münster J. Math. 1, 9–14 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Macdonald, I.G.: Polynomials associated with finite cell-complexes. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 4, 181–192 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Materov, E.N.: The Bott formula for toric varieties. Mosc. Math. J. 2(1), 161–182 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Maxim, L.G., Schürmann, J.: Characteristic classes of singular toric varieties. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 68(12), 2177–2236 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Pukhlikov, A.V., Khovanskiĭ, A.G.: The Riemann–Roch theorem for integrals and sums of quasipolynomials on virtual polytopes. St. Petersburg Math. J. 4(4), 789–812 (1992)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Stanley, R.: Generalized \(H\)-vectors, intersection cohomology of toric varieties, and related results. In: Nagata, M., Matsumura, H. (eds.) Commutative Algebra and Combinatorics Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, vol. 11, pp. 187–213. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1987)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Stanley, R.P.: Enumerative Combinatorics. Volume 1. 2nd edn. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 49. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank David Cox and Michèle Vergne for helpful comments. Two of us (MB and EM) thank the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics for its hospitality, where some of these results were initially worked out. We thank Toru Ohmoto, who informed us of [9] after this work was completed. Finally, we thank the anonymous referees for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul E. Gunnells.

Additional information

Editor in Charge: János Pach

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

MB was partially supported by the NSF through Grant DMS-1162638. PG was partially supported by the NSF through Grants DMS-1101640 and DMS-1501832.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beck, M., Gunnells, P.E. & Materov, E. Weighted Lattice Point Sums in Lattice Polytopes, Unifying Dehn–Sommerville and Ehrhart–Macdonald. Discrete Comput Geom 65, 365–384 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-020-00175-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-020-00175-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation