Skip to main content
Log in

Cellulase immobilized on kaolin as a potential approach to improve the quality of knitted fabric

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biopolishing is a textile process that uses cellulases to improve the pilling resistance of fabrics. Although the process improves the pilling resistance, softness and color brightness of fabrics, it causes a significant loss of tensile strength in treated fabrics. The present work studied the use of cellulase immobilized on kaolin by adsorption and covalent bonding in biopolishing to get around this problem. The cellulase immobilization has been reported as promising alternative to overcome the inconvenient of biopolishing, but it has been very poorly explored. The results showed that cellulase immobilized by both covalent bonding and adsorption methods provided to the knitted fabric similar or superior pilling resistance to free cellulase, but with greater tensile strength. Immobilization also allowed for efficient recovery and reuse of the enzyme. The present work is a relevant contribution to the literature, since, as far as we know, it is the first work that shows it is possible to minimize the loss of tensile strength and also reuse the immobilized enzyme, giving a better-quality product and also contribution to reducing the cost of the polishing step.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BPc:

Biopolishing with buffer solution only

BPk:

Biopolishing with buffer solution and kaolin

BPe:

Biopolishing with free cellulase

BPads:

Biopolishing with cellulase immobilized on kaolin by adsorption

BPcov:

Biopolishing with cellulase immobilized on kaolin by covalent bonding

References

  1. Jegannathan KR, Nielsen PH (2013) Environmental assessment of enzyme use in industrial production—a literature review. J Clean Prod 42:228–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Heikinheimo L (2002) Trichoderma reesei cellulases in processing of cotton. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT Publications

    Google Scholar 

  3. Esfandiari A, Firouzi-Pouyaei E, Aghaei-Meibodi P (2014) Effect of enzymatic and mechanical treatment on combined desizing and bio-polishing of cotton fabrics. J Text Inst 105:1193–1202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kirk O, Borchert TV, Fuglsang CC (2002) Industrial enzyme applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13:345–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aly A, Moustafa A, Hebeish A (2004) Bio-technological treatment of cellulosic textiles. J Clean Prod 12:697–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Besegatto SV, Costa FN, Damas MSP, Colombi BL, De Rossi AC, de Aguiar CRL, Immich APS (2018) Enzyme treatment at different stages of textile processing: a review. Ind Biotechnol 14:298–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Costa FN, Lima JS, Valério A, de Souza AA, de Oliveira D (2021) Utilization of montmorillonite in biostoning process as a strategy for effluent reuse. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 96:890–898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Galante YM, Formantici C (2003) Enzyme applications in detergency and in manufacturing industries. Curr Org Chem 7:1399–1422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hauser PJ, Schindler W (2004) Finishing with enzymes: bio-finishes for cellulose. Chemical finishing of textiles. Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheikh J, Bramhecha I (2019) Enzymes for green chemical processing of cotton. In: The impact and prospects of green chemistry for textile technology. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ukponmwan J, Mukhopadhyay A, Chatterjee K (1998) Pilling. Text Prog 28:1–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen X, Huang X (2004) Evaluating fabric pilling with light-projected image analysis. Text Res J 74:977–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Andreaus J, Olekszyszen DN, Silveria MHL (2014) Processing of cellulosic textile materials with cellulase. In: Cellulose and other naturally occurring polymers. Research Signpost, Kerala, India, pp 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  14. Choudhury AR (2014) Sustainable textile wet processing: applications of enzymes. Roadmap sustainable textile and clothing. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  15. Buschle-Diller G, Zeronian S, Pan N, Yoon M (1994) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cotton, linen, ramie, and viscose rayon fabrics. Text Res J 64:270–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Uddin MG (2015) Effects of biopolishing on the quality of cotton fabrics using acid and neutral cellulases. Text Cloth Sustain 1:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sankarraj N, Nallathambi G (2018) Enzymatic biopolishing of cotton fabric with free/immobilized cellulase. Carbohydr Polym 191:95–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu Y, Yuan J, Wang Q, Fan X, Ni X, Wang P, Cui L (2013) Cellulase immobilization onto the reversibly soluble methacrylate copolymer for denim washing. Carbohydr Polym 95:675–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu Y, Yuan J, Wang Q, Fan X, Wang P, Cui L (2015) Noncovalent immobilization of cellulases using the reversibly soluble polymers for biopolishing of cotton fabric. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 62:494–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lenting H, Warmoeskerken M (2001) Guidelines to come to minimized tensile strength loss upon cellulase application. J Biotechnol 89:227–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Šimić K, Soljačić I, Pušić T (2015) Application of cellulases in the process of finishing. Tekstilec 58:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu Y, Yuan J, Wang Q, Fan X, Wang P, Cui L (2014) A promising approach for bio-finishing of cotton using immobilized acid-cellulase. Fibers Polym 15:932–937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu Y, Yuan J, Wang Q, Fan X, Wang P, Sun X (2013) Immobilization of cellulases on the reversibly soluble polymer E udragit S-100 for cotton treatment. Eng Life Sci 13:194–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar V, Meenakshisundaram S, Selvakumar N (2008) Conservation of cellulase enzyme in biopolishing application of cotton fabrics. J Text Inst 99:339–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. ABNT (1994) Textiles—determination of colour fastness to bleaching peroxide—method of test. ABNT, Sao Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lima JS, Costa FN, Bastistella MA, de Araújo PHH, de Oliveira D (2019) Functionalized kaolin as support for endoglucanase immobilization. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 42:1165–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lima JS, Boemo APSI, de Araújo PHH, de Oliveira D (2021) Immobilization of endoglucanase on kaolin by adsorption and covalent bonding. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 44:1627–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ABNT (2009) ABNT NBR ISO 105–E06:2009—Textiles—tests for colour fastness Part E06: colour fastness to spotting: Alkali. ABNT, Sao Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  29. ABNT (2016) ABNT NBR ISO 13934-1:2016—Textiles—tensile properties of fabrics part 1: determination of maximum force and elongation at maximum force using the strip method. ABNT, Sao Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  30. ASTM (2015) ASTM E313-15—Standard practice for calculating yellowness and whiteness indices from instrumentally measured color coordinates. ASTM, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  31. ASTM (2007) ASTM D4970-07—Standard test method for pilling resistance and other related surface changes of textile fabrics: martindale tester. ASTM, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lima JS, Araújo PHH, Sayer C, Souza AAU, Viegas AC, de Oliveira D (2017) Cellulase immobilization on magnetic nanoparticles encapsulated in polymer nanospheres. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 40:511–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller G (1959) Determination of reducing sugar by DNS method. Anal Chem 31:426–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Broadbent AD (2001) Basic principles of textile coloration. Society of Dyers and Colourists, West Yorkshire

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Alessandretti R, Pérez MM, Della Bona A (2016) Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. Dent Mater 32:82–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Saravanan D, Vasanthi N, Ramachandran T (2009) A review on influential behaviour of biopolishing on dyeability and certain physico-mechanical properties of cotton fabrics. Carbohydr Polym 76:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Montazer M, Harifi T (2018) Introduction: textile finishing. In: Nanofinishing of textile materials. Woodhead Publishing, United States

    Google Scholar 

  38. Choudhury AKR (2017) Various ecofriendly finishes. In: Principles of textile finishing. Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  39. Khanjanzadeh H, Behrooz R, Bahramifar N, Gindl-Altmutter W, Bacher M, Edler M, Griesser T (2018) Surface chemical functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals by 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane. Int J Biol Macromol 106:1288–1296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mondal M, Islam M, Ahmed F (2018) Modification of cotton fibre with functionalized silane coupling agents vinyltriethoxysilane and aminopropyltriethoxy-silane. J Text Sci Eng 8:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pujiasih S, Masykur A, Kusumaningsih T, Saputra OA (2018) Silylation and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose isolated from Indonesian native oil palm empty fruit bunch. Carbohydr Polym 184:74–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rafieian F, Mousavi M, Yu Q, Jonoobi M (2019) Amine functionalization of microcrystalline cellulose assisted by (3-chloropropyl) triethoxysilane. Int J Biol Macromol 130:280–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jeon JG, Kim HC, Palem RR, Kim J, Kang TJ (2019) Cross-linking of cellulose nanofiber films with glutaraldehyde for improved mechanical properties. Mater Lett 250:99–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu T, Du Y, Yan N, Farnood R (2015) Cellulose fiber networks reinforced with glutaraldehyde–chitosan complexes. J Appl Polym Sci 132:42375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hopwood D, Allen C, McCabe M (1970) The reactions between glutaraldehyde and various proteins. An investigation of their kinetics. Histochem J 2:137–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mokrzycki WS, Tatol M (2011) Colour difference ∆E-a survey. Mach Graph Vis 20:383–411

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Coordination for the Improvement of Higher-Level Personnel (CAPES-PRINT/88887.310560/2018-00), Central Laboratory of Electron Microscopy (LCME—UFSC) for SEM analyses, and Akmey and Imerys companies that kindly supplied the enzyme and kaolin, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Débora de Oliveira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Souza Lima, J., Immich, A.P.S., de Araújo, P.H.H. et al. Cellulase immobilized on kaolin as a potential approach to improve the quality of knitted fabric. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 45, 679–688 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02686-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02686-5

Keywords

Navigation