Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of flux and gel layer on microfilter and non-woven fabric filter surface based on anoxic–aerobic MBRs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-woven fabric filter- (NWFF) and microfilter-MBR modules were made using 100 μm polypropylene and 0.25 μm polyethylene materials, respectively. The performances and mechanisms of the two processes were investigated, including additional batch filtration tests to find the function of the dynamic gel layer on the membrane surface. The HRT of both MBRs was 9 h and the operating permeate flux was 13 L/m2/h. The two MBRs consisted of an anoxic and aerobic reactor. The NWFF or microfilter (MF) was submerged in each of the aerobic reactors. The two MBRs showed similar performances for the removal of organic matters, suspended solids and nitrogen. Cake formation on the NWFF contributed to major resistance, while the gel layer on the microfilter or internal fouling of the pores played a key role in the fouling of the membrane surface. The amount of soluble extracellular polymer substances (EPS) (13 mg/L) of the attached sludge on the NWFF surface was larger than that (11 mg/L) of that suspended sludge. Consequently, the functional gel layer for the coarse and microfilter is established based on the relationship among the EPS, transmembrane pressure and MLSS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kiso Y, Jung YJ, Ichinari T, Park M, Kitao T, Nishimura K, Min KS (2000) Wastewater treatment performance of a filtration bio-reactor equipped with a mesh as a filter material. Water Res 34:4143–4150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang IS, Gander M, Jefferson B, Judd SJ (2001) Low-cost membranes for use in a submerged MBR. Trans IChemE 79:183–188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang MC, Horng RY, Shao H, Hu YJ (2006) Performance and filtration characteristics of non-woven membranes used in a submerged membrane bioreactor for synthetic wastewater treatment. Desalination 191:8–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang WK, Hu AYJ, Horng RY, Tzou WY (2007) Membrane bioreactor with nonwoven fabrics as solid-liquid separation media for wastewater treatment. Desalination 202:122–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Iversen V, Drews A, Schmidt T (2007) Textile filter medium for the use in membrane vistalization plant. Chem Ing Technol 79:1945–1950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seo GT, Moon BH, Park YM, Kim SH (2007) Filtration characteristics of immersed coarse pore filters in an activated sludge system for domestic wastewater reclamation. Water Sci Technol 55:51–58

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Satyawali Y, Balakrishnan M (2008) Treatment of distillery effluent in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) equipped with mesh filter. Sep Purif Technol 63:278–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Meng F, Chae SR, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin HS, Yang F (2009) Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res 43:1489–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang IS, Clech PL, Jefferson B, Judd S (2002) Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J Environ Eng 128:1018–1029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Le-Clech P, Chen V, Fane TAG (2006) Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 248:17–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moghaddam MRA, Guan Y, Satoh H, Mino T (2006) Filter clogging in coarse pore filtration activated sludge process under high MLSS concentration. Water Sci Technol 54:55–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan B, Huang X (2002) Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 36:5245–5251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou XH, Shi HC, Cai Q, He M, Wu YX (2008) Function of self-forming dynamic membrane and biokinetic parameters determination by microelectrode. Water Res 42:2369–2376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dominguez L, Rodriguez M, Prats D (2010) Effect of different extraction methods on bound EPS from MBR sludge. Part Ι: influence of extraction methods over three-dimensional EEM fluorescence spectroscopy fingerprint. Desalination 261:19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee J, Ahn WY, Lee CH (2011) Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 35:2435–2445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ognier S, Wisniewski C, Grasmick A (2004) Membrane bioreactor fouling in sub-critical filtration conditions: a local critical flux concept. J Membr Sci 229:171–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu YX, Huang X, Wen XH, Chen FT (2005) Function of dynamic membrane in self-forming dynamic membrane coupled bioreactor. Water Sci Technol 51:107–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeong TY, Cha GC, Yoo IK, Kim DJ (2007) Characteristics of bio-fouling in a submerged MBR. Desalination 207:107–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Barker DJ, Stuckey DC (1999) A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment system. Water Res 33:3063–3082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bouhabila EH, Ben AR, Buisson H (1998) Microfiltration of activated sludge using submerged membrane with air bubbling (application to wastewater treatment). Desalination 118:315–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wisniewski C, Grasmick A (1998) Floc size distribution in a membrane bioreactor and consequences for membrane fouling. Colloids Surf 138:403–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wingender J, Neu TR, Flemming HC (1999) Microbial extracellular polymeric substances-characterization, structure and function. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Hocaoglu SM, Orhon D (2010) Fate of soluble residual organics in membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 364:65–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Korea Institute of Science and Technology and the Korea Ministry of Environment as Program for Promoting Commercialization of Promising Environmental Technologies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung-Guen Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, JY., Choi, BK., Ahn, KH. et al. Characteristics of flux and gel layer on microfilter and non-woven fabric filter surface based on anoxic–aerobic MBRs. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35, 1389–1398 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-012-0727-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-012-0727-z

Keywords

Navigation