Skip to main content
Log in

Myrmecochores can target high-quality disperser ants: variation in elaiosome traits and ant preferences for myrmecochorous Euphorbiaceae in Brazilian Caatinga

  • Plant-microbe-animal interactions - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the traditional view of myrmecochory as a highly diffuse interaction between diaspores and a wide range of ant species attracted to their elaiosomes may not be correct. The effectiveness of dispersal varies markedly among ant species, and combined with differential attractiveness of diaspores due to elaiosome size and composition, this raises the potential for myrmecochorous plants to target ant species that offer the highest quality dispersal services. We ask the question: Do particular physical and chemical traits of elaiosomes result in disproportionate removal of Euphorbiaceae diaspores by high-quality disperser ants in Caatinga vegetation of north-eastern Brazil? We offered seeds of five euphorb species that varied in morphological and chemical traits of elaiosomes to seed-dispersing ants. High-quality seed-disperser ants (species of Dinoponera, Ectatomma and Camponotus) were identified as those that rapidly collected and transported diaspores to their nests, often over substantial distances, whereas low-quality disperser ants (primarily species of Pheidole and Solenopsis) typically fed on elaiosomes in situ, and only ever transported diaspores very short distances. Low-quality disperser ants were equally attracted to the elaiosomes of all study species. However, high-quality dispersers showed a strong preference for diaspores with the highest elaiosome mass (and especially proportional mass). As far as we are aware, this is the first study to identify a mechanism of diaspore selection by high-quality ant dispersers based on elaiosome traits under field conditions. Our findings suggest that myrmecochorous plants can preferentially target high-quality seed-disperser ants through the evolution of particular elaiosome traits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen AN (1988) Dispersal distance as a benefit of myrmecochory. Oecologia 75:507–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN, Morrison S (1998) Myrmecochory in Australia’s seasonal tropics: effects of disturbance on distance dispersal. Aust J Ecol 23:483–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aranda-Rickert A, Fracchia S (2011) Are subordinate ants the best seed dispersers? Linking dominance hierarchies and seed dispersal ability in myrmecochory interaction. Arthropod Plant Interact 6:297–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo FS, Martins SV, Neto JAAM, Lani JL, Pires IE (2006) Estrutura da vegetação arbustiva-arbórea colonizadora de uma área degradada por mineração de caulim, Brás Pires, MG. Rev Arvore 30:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bas JM, Oliveras J, Goméz C (2009) Myrmecochory and short-term seed fate in Rhamnus alaternus: ant species and seed characteristics. Acta Oecol 35:380–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie AJ (1983) Distribution of ant-dispersal plants. Sonderb Naturwiss Hamb 71:421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie AJ (1985) The evolutionary ecology of ant–plant mutualism, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Menzel F, Hovestadt T, Fiala B (2007) Specialization, constraints, and conflicting interests in mutualistics networks. Curr Biol 17:341–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brew CR, O’Downd OJ, Rae ID (1989) Seed dispersal by ants: behavior releasing compounds in elaiosome. Oecologia 80:490–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein JL (1994) Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 9:214–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein JL (2001) The cost of mutualisms. Am Zool 41:825–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne MM, Levey DJ (1993) Removal of seeds from frugivore defecations by ants in Costa-Rican rain-forest. Vegetatio 108:363–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings K, Heithaus ER (1992) Changing response of ants to myrmecochorous seeds. Ohio J Sci 92:59

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW, Morton SR (1981) Myrmecochory in some plants (F. chenopodiaceae) of the Australia arid zone. Oecologia 50:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer RC, Ölzant SM, Wanek W, Mayer V (2005) The fate of Corydalis cava elaiosome within an ant colony of Myrmica rubra: elaiosome are preferentially fed to larvae. Insectes Souc 52:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gammans N, Bullock JM, Gibbons H, Schönrogge K (2006) Reaction of mutualistic and granivorous ants to Ulex elaiosome chemicals. J Chem Ecol 32:1935–1947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghunter RW, Lanza J (1989) Variation in attractiveness of Trillium diaspores to a seed-dispersing ant. Am Nat 122:321–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Giladi I (2006) Choosing benefits or partners: a review of the evidence for the evolution of myrmecochory. Oikos 112:481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorb SN, Gorb EV (1999) Dropping rates of elaiosome-bearing seeds during transport by ants (Formica polyctena Foerst.): implications for distance dispersal. Acta Oecol 20:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorb E, Gorb SN (2003) Seeds dispersal by ants in a decidual forest ecosystem. In: Mechanisms, strategies, adaptations, 1st edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  • Gordon DM (1983) Dependence of necrophoric response to oleic acid on social context in the ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. J Chem Ecol 9:105–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gove AD, Majer JD, Dunn RR (2007) A keystone ant species promotes seed dispersal in a “diffuse” mutualism. Oecologia 153:687–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L, Westoby M (1992) Effect of diaspores characteristics on removal of seeds adapted for dispersal by ants. Ecology 73:1300–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes LM, Westoby M, Jurado E (1994) Convergence of elaiosome and insect prey: evidence from ant foraging behaviour and fatty acids composition. Funct Ecol 8:358–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2012) Recursos naturais e estudos ambientais. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/recursosnaturais/default.shtm. Accessed 10 December 2012

  • Kaspari M (1996) Worker size and seed size selection by harvester ants in neotropical forest. Oecologia 105:397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza J, Schimitt MA, Awad AB (1992) Comparative chemistry of elaiosomes of three species of Trillium. J Chem Ecol 18:209–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leal LC (2009) As bordas influenciam a densidade e a riqueza de Euphorbiaceae em áreas de Caatinga? In: Leal IR, Almeida-Cortez J, Santos JC (eds) Ecologia de Campo da Caatinga, 1st edn. Editora Universitária da UFPE, Recife, pp 60–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal IR, Wirth R, Tabarelli M (2007) Seed dispersal by ants in semi-arid Caatinga of north-east Brazil. Ann Bot Lond 99:885–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo D, Tabarelli M, Leal IR (2011) Relocation of Croton sonderianus (Euphorbiaceae) seeds by Pheidole fallax Mayr (Formicidae): a case of post-dispersal seed protection by ants. Neotrop Entomol 40:440–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manzaneda AJ, Rey PJ (2008) Geographic variation in seed removal of a myrmecochorous herb: influence of variation in functional guild and species composition of disperser assemblage through spatial and temporal scale. Ecography 31:583–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark S, Olesen JM (1996) Importance of elaiosome size to removal of ant-dispersed seeds. Oecologia 107:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DL, Beattie AG, Bollenbacher WE (1979) Evidence for diglycerides attractants in an ant–seed interaction. J Chem Ecol 5:335–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ness JH, Bronstein JL, Andersen AN, Holland JN (2004) Ant body size predicts dispersal distance of ant-adapted seeds: implications of small-ant invasions. Ecology 85:1244-1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness JH, Morin F, Giladi I (2009) Uncommon specialization in mutualism between a temperate herbaceous plant guild and the ant: are Aphaenogaster ants keystone mutualistics? Oikos 118:1793–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1997) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oostemeijer JGB (1989) Myrmecochory in Polygala vulgaris L., Luzula campestris (L) D.C. and Viola curtisii Foster in Dutch dune area. Oecologia 78:302–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington RT, Prado DA, Pendry C (2000) Neotropical seasonally dry forests and Pleistocene vegetation changes. J Biogeogr 27:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters M, Oberrath R, Böhning-Gaese K (2003) Seed dispersal by ants: are seeds preferences influenced by foraging strategies or historical constraints? Flora 198:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizo MA, Oliveira PS (2001) Size and lipid content of nonmyrmecochorous diaspores: effects on the interaction with litter-foraging ants in the Atlantic rain forest of Brazil. Plant Ecol 157:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado DE (2003) As Caatingas das Américas do Sul. In: Leal IR, Almeida-Cortez J, Santos JC (eds) Ecologia e Conservação da Caatinga, 1st edn. Editora Universitária da UFPE, Recife, pp 3–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Pudlo RJ, Beattie AJ, Culver DC (1980) Population consequences of changes in an ant-mutualism in Sanguinaria canadensis. Oecologia 46:32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudgers JA, Strauss SY (2004) A selection mosaic in the facultative mutualism between ants and wild cotton. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 271:2481–2488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio EVSB (1995) Overview of the Brazilian Caatinga. In: Bullock SH, Money HA, Medina E (eds) Seasonally dry tropical forests, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 34–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Servigne P, Detrain C (2008) Ant–seed interactions: combined effects of ant and plants species on seed removal patterns. Insects Soc 55:220–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva RA, Santos AMM, Tabarelli M (2003) Riqueza de plantas lenhosas em cinco unidades de paisagem da Caatinga. In: Leal IR, Almeida-Cortez J, Santos JC (eds) Ecologia e Conservação da Caatinga, 1st edn. Editora Universitária da UFPE, Recife, pp 337–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright NT, Orians GH (1982) Seed dispersal by animals: contrasts with pollen dispersal, problems of terminology and constraints of coevolution. Am Nat 119:402–413. doi:10.1086/283918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO, Durlach NI, Roth LM (1958) Chemical releasers of necrophoric behaviour in ants. Psyche 65:108–114. doi:10.1155/1958/69391

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE process 0140-2.05/08) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq process 4772902009-4). FACEPE also provided a master’s fellowship to L. C. Leal and CNPq provided a research grant to I. R. Leal. We also thank the Estação de Agricultura Irrigada de Parnamirim (Pernambuco—Brazil) for logistic support, K. Rito, G. Burle and M. Meiado for their help in the field experiments and K. V. Figueiredo for her help in the elaiosome chemical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inara R. Leal.

Additional information

Communicated by Diethart Matthies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leal, L.C., Neto, M.C.L., de Oliveira, A.F.M. et al. Myrmecochores can target high-quality disperser ants: variation in elaiosome traits and ant preferences for myrmecochorous Euphorbiaceae in Brazilian Caatinga. Oecologia 174, 493–500 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2789-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2789-2

Keywords

Navigation