Skip to main content
Log in

Insect density–plant density relationships: a modified view of insect responses to resource concentrations

  • Population ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Habitat area is an important predictor of spatial variation in animal densities. However, the area often correlates with the quantity of resources within habitats, complicating our understanding of the factors shaping animal distributions. We addressed this problem by investigating densities of insect herbivores in habitat patches with a constant area but varying numbers of plants. Using a mathematical model, predictions of scale-dependent immigration and emigration rates for insects into patches with different densities of host plants were derived. Moreover, a field experiment was conducted where the scaling properties of odour-mediated attraction in relation to the number of odour sources were estimated, in order to derive a prediction of immigration rates of olfactory searchers. The theoretical model predicted that we should expect immigration rates of contact and visual searchers to be determined by patch area, with a steep scaling coefficient, μ = −1. The field experiment suggested that olfactory searchers should show a less steep scaling coefficient, with μ ≈ −0.5. A parameter estimation and analysis of published data revealed a correspondence between observations and predictions, and density-variation among groups could largely be explained by search behaviour. Aphids showed scaling coefficients corresponding to the prediction for contact/visual searchers, whereas moths, flies and beetles corresponded to the prediction for olfactory searchers. As density responses varied considerably among groups, and variation could be explained by a certain trait, we conclude that a general theory of insect responses to habitat heterogeneity should be based on shared traits, rather than a general prediction for all species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson P, Löfstedt C, Hambäck PA (2013) How insects sense olfactory patches—the spatial scaling of olfactory information. Oikos 122:1009–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andow DA (1991) Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annu Rev Entomol 36:561–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach CE (1980) Effects of plant-density and diversity on the population-dynamics of a specialist herbivore, the Striped cucumber beetle, Acalymma vittata (Fab). Ecology 61:1515–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach CE (1986) A comparison of the responses of 2 tropical specialist herbivores to host plant patch size. Oecologia 68:580–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks JE (1998) The scale of landscape fragmentation affects herbivore response to vegetation heterogeneity. Oecologia 117:239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommarco R, Banks JE (2003) Scale as modifier in vegetation diversity experiments: effects on herbivores and predators. Oikos 102:440–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommarco R, Biesmeijer JC, Meyer B, Potts SG, Pöyry J, Roberts SPM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Öckinger E (2010) Dispersal capacity and diet breadth modify the response of wild bees to habitat loss. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:2075–2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert WH, Wilson EO (1963) Analysis of olfactory communication among animals. J Theor Biol 5:443–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MA, Matter SF (1997) Landscape ecology of mammals: relationships between density and patch size. J Mammal 78:999–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman J, Cappuccino N, Fahrig L (2002) Patch size and population density: the effect of immigration behavior. Conserv Ecol 6, Article 9

  • Bukovinszky T, Potting RPJ, Clough Y, van Lenteren JC, Vet LEM (2005) The role of pre- and post- alighting detection mechanisms in the responses to patch size by specialist herbivores. Oikos 109:435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardé RT, Willis MA (2008) Navigational strategies used by insects to find distant, wind-borne sources of odor. J Chem Ecol 34:854–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardé RT, Cardé AM, Girling RD (2011) Observations on the flight paths of the day-flying moth Virbia lamae during periods of mate location: do males have a strategy for contacting the pheromone plume? J Anim Ecol 81:268–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chow A (2000) Influence of host distribution on foraging behaviour in the hyperparasitoid wasp, Dendrocerus carpenteri. Entomol Exp Appl 97:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll M, Bottrell DG (1994) Effects of nonhost plants on an insect herbivore in diverse habitats. Ecology 75:723–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor EF, Courtney AC, Yoder JM (2000) Individuals-area relationships: the relationship between animal population density and area. Ecology 81:734–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello MJ (1995) Spectral reflectance from a broccoli crop with vegetation or soil as background—influence on immigration by Brevicoryne brassicae and Myzus persicae. Entomol Exp Appl 75:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W, Quinn JL (2011) Predicting the optimal prey group size from predator hunting behaviour. J Anim Ecol 80:310–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cromartie WJ (1975) Effect of stand size and vegetational background on colonization of cruciferous plants by herbivorous insects. J Appl Ecol 12:517–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1996) Nocturnality and species survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:11709–11712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen G, Bernstein C (1999) Patch departure mechanisms and optimal host exploitation in an insect parasitoid. J Anim Ecol 68:445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englund G, Hambäck PA (2004) Scale dependence of emigration rates. Ecology 85:320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englund G, Hambäck PA (2007) Scale dependence of immigration rates: models, metrics and data. J Anim Ecol 76:30–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez P, Hilker M (2007) Host plant location by Chrysomelidae. Basic Appl Ecol 8:97–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch S, Collier RH (2000) Host-plant selection by insects—a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomol Exp Appl 96:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Matter SF (2002) Individuals-area relationships: comment. Ecology 83:288–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden DM, Crist TO (1999) Experimental effects of habitat fragmentation on old-field canopy insects: community, guild and species responses. Oecologia 118:371–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grez AA, Gonzalez RH (1995) Resource concentration hypothesis—effect of host-plant patch size on density of herbivorous insects. Oecologia 103:471–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambäck PA, Englund G (2005) Patch area, population density and the scaling of migration rates: the resource concentration hypothesis revisited. Ecol Lett 8:1057–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambäck PA, Summerville KS, Steffan-Dewenter I, Krauss J, Englund G, Crist TO (2007) Habitat specialization, body size, and family identity explain lepidopteran density-area relationships in a cross-continental comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:8368–8373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hambäck PA, Bergman K-O, Bommarco R, Krauss J, Kuussaari M, Pöyri J, Öckinger E (2010a) Allometric density responses in butterflies: the response to small and large patches by small and large species. Ecography 33:1149–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambäck PA, Björkman M, Hopkins RJ (2010b) Patch size effects are more important than genetic diversity for plant-herbivore interactions in Brassica crops. Ecol Entomol 35:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambäck PA, Andersson P, Bukovinszky T (2012) Trait-mediated effects modify patch-size density relationships in insect herbivores and parasitoids. In: Ohgushi T, Schmitz O, Holt RD (eds) Trait-mediated indirect interactions: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp 466–488

  • Hawkes C (1974) Dispersal of adult cabbage root fly (Erioischia brassicae (Bouche)) in relation to a Brassica crop. J Appl Ecol 11:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou CC, Bartumeus F, Krause J, Ruxton GD (2011) Unified effects of aggregation reveal larger prey groups take longer to find. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:2985–2990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenner WH, Roitberg BD (2009) Foraging behaviour and patch exploitation by Campoplex dubitator (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a parasitoid of bark-mining larvae. J Insect Behav 22:257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P (1982) Experimental and mathematical analyses of herbivore movement: quantifying the influence of plant spacing and quality on foraging discrimination. Ecol Monogr 52:261–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P (1985) Finding and losing host plants by Phyllotreta - patch size and surrounding habitat. Ecology 66:1809–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kring JB (1972) Flight behavior of aphids. Annu Rev Entomol 17:461–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kugimiya S, Shimoda T, Wajnberg E, Uefune M, Takabayashi J (2010) Host-searching responses to herbivory-associated chemical information and patch use depend on mating status of female solitary parasitoid wasps. Ecol Entomol 35:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1999) Patterns of herbivore incidence on experimental arrays and field populations of ragwort, Senecio jacobaea. Oikos 84:515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lihoreau M, Chittka L, Raine NE (2011) Trade-off between travel distance and prioritization of high-reward sites in traplining bumblebees. Funct Ecol 25:1284–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Louapre P, van Baaren J, Pierre JS, van Alphen JJM (2011) Information gleaned and former patch quality determine foraging behavior of parasitic wasps. Behav Ecol 22:1064–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangel M (1994) Spatial patterning in resource exploitation and conservation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 343:93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marini L, Bommarco R, Fontana P, Battisti A (2010) Disentangling effects of habitat diversity and area on orthopteran species with contrasting mobility. Biol Conserv 143:2164–2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyes CL, Raybould AF (2001) The role of spatial scale and intraspecific variation in secondary chemistry in host-plant location by Ceutorhynchus assimilis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1567–1573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muratori F, Boivin G, Hance T (2008) The impact of patch encounter rate on patch residence time of female parasitoids increases with patch quality. Ecol Entomol 33:422–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murlis J, Elkinton JS, Cardé RT (1992) Odor plumes and how insects use them. Annu Rev Entomol 37:505–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öckinger E, Franzen M, Rundlöf M, Smith HG (2009) Mobility-dependent effects on species richness in fragmented landscapes. Basic Appl Ecol 10:573–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öckinger E, Schweiger O, Crist TO, Debinski DM, Krauss J, Kuussaari M, Petersen JD, Pöyry J, Settele J, Summerville KS, Bommarco R (2010) Life-history traits predict species responses to habitat area and isolation: a cross-continental synthesis. Ecol Lett 13:969–979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otway SJ, Hector A, Lawton JL (2005) Resource dilution effects on specialist insect herbivores in a grassland biodiversity experiment. J Anim Ecol 74:234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacala SW, Hassell MP (1991) The persistence of host-parasitoid associations in patchy environments. 2 Evaluation of field data. Am Nat 138:584–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds AM, Reynolds DR, Smith AD, Svensson GP, Löfstedt C (2007) Appetitive flight patterns of male Agrotis segetum moths over landscape scales. J Theor Biol 245:141–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhainds M, English-Loeb G (2003) Testing the resource concentration hypothesis with tarnished plant bug on strawberry: density of hosts and patch size influence the interaction between abundance of nymphs and incidence of damage. Ecol Entomol 28:348–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riffell JA, Abrell L, Hildebrand JG (2008) Physical processes and real-time chemical measurement of the insect olfactory environment. J Chem Ecol 34:837–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Root RB (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol Monogr 43:95–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root RB, Kareiva PM (1984) The search for resources by cabbage butterflies (Pieris rapae): ecological consequences and adaptive significance of markovian movements in a patchy environment. Ecology 65:147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Germain M, Drapeau P, Hebert C (2004) Landscape-scale habitat selection patterns of Monochamus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in a recently burned black spruce forest. Environ Entomol 33:1703–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan W, Shelton AM (1989) Parasitoid response to concentration of herbivore food plants—finding and leaving plants. Ecology 70:993–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML (1983) Spatial patterns in the plant community and their effects upon insect search. In: Ahmad S (ed) Herbivorous insects: host seeking behavior and mechanics. Academic, New York pp 125–157

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenhumberg B, Keller MA, Possingham HP, Tyre AJ (2001) Optimal patch-leaving behaviour: a case study using the parasitoid Cotesia rubecular. J Anim Ecol 70:683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Kunin WE (1999) The spatial structure of populations. J Anim Ecol 68:647–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonhasca A, Byrne DN (1994) The effects of crop diversification on herbivorous insects—a metaanalysis approach. Ecol Entomol 19:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (1988) The effect of host-plant density on the numbers of Mexican bean beetles, Epilachna varivestis. Am Midl Nat 119:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (1991) Translating foraging movements in heterogeneous environments into the spatial-distribution of foragers. Ecology 72:1253–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Alphen JJM, Galis F (1983) Patch time allocation and parasitization efficiency of Asobara tabida, a larval parasitoid of Drosophila. J Anim Ecol 52:937–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Alphen J, Bernstein C, Driessen G (2003) Information acquisition and time allocation in insect parasitoids. Trends Ecol Evol 18:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vet LEM, Dicke M (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu Rev Entomol 37:141–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XG, Keller MA (2005) Patch time allocation by the parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). II. Effects of host density and distribution. J Insect Behav 18:171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XG, Messing RH (2003) Foraging behavior and patch time allocation by Fopius arisanus (Hymenoptera : Braconidae), an egg-larval parasitoid of tephritid fruit flies. J Insect Behav 16:593–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis MA, Arbas EA (1991) Odor-modulated upwind flight of the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta. J Comp Physiol A 169:427–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura K (1999) Relation between plant density and arthropod density in cabbage. Res Popul Ecol 41:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Emma Warnefors for assisting the field experiment, Erling Jirle for rearing of moths and help with practical issues, and Brian D. Inouye for statistical help. We also thank Brian D. Inouye, John G. Bishop and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. The study was financed by the Swedish research council (VR) to P.A. Hambäck (contract no. 621-2006-2996).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petter Andersson.

Additional information

Communicated by Roland Brandl.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 72 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 89 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, P., Löfstedt, C. & Hambäck, P.A. Insect density–plant density relationships: a modified view of insect responses to resource concentrations. Oecologia 173, 1333–1344 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2737-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2737-1

Keywords

Navigation