Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of intraspecific competition on resource allocation during dependent colony foundation in a social insect

  • Behavioral ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organisms face a trade-off between investment in fewer, larger offspring, or more, smaller offspring. Most organisms can adjust investment through variation in the size and number of offspring in response to factors such as resource availability and competition. In some social animals, established colonies divide into groups of individuals that become autonomous, a process known as colony fission (also dependent colony foundation in social insects). Resource allocation under fission can be fine-tuned by adjusting the number of new groups (offspring number) and the number of individuals in each new group (offspring size). We assessed the influence of competition on resource allocation during fission in the ant Cataglyphis cursor, by allowing colonies to fission in experimental enclosures of high or low conspecific colony density. The pattern of colony fission was similar to that observed in the field: each fissioning colony produced a few new nests comprising a highly variable number of workers and a single queen, the old queen was often replaced, and new queens were produced in excess. The number of new nests produced depended on the available workforce in the parent colony but was not affected by differences in colony density. Comparison with data from fission under natural field conditions, however, indicates that colonies in enclosures produced fewer, larger new nests, suggesting that resource investment patterns during fission are indeed subject to extrinsic factors. The density of conspecific colonies in the immediate surroundings may be an unreliable estimate of competition intensity and other factors should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RM, Buckley YM, Marshall DJ (2008) Offspring size plasticity in response to intraspecific competition: an adaptive maternal effect across life-history stages. Am Nat 171(2):225–237. doi:10.1086/524952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amor F, Ortega P, Jowers MJ, Cerdá X, Billen J, Lenoir A, Boulay R (2011) The evolution of worker–queen polymorphism in Cataglyphis ants: interplay between individualand colony-level selections. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1473–1482. doi:10.1007/s00265-011-1157-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1992) Regulation of momentary diversity by dominant species in exceptionally rich ant communities of the Australian seasonal tropics. Am Nat 140(3):401–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (2000) A global ecology of rainforest ants: functional groups in relation to environmental stress and disturbance. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks MA, Eichert W (2000) WHICHRUN (Version 3.2) a computer program for population assignment of individuals based on multilocus genotype data. J Hered 91:87–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bashey F (2008) Competition as a selective mechanism for larger offspring size in guppies. Oikos 117(1):104–113. doi:10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16094.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulay R, Galarza JA, Chéron B, Hefetz A, Lenoir A, van Oudenhove L, Cerdá X (2010) Intraspecific competition affects population size and resource allocation in an ant dispersing by colony fission. Ecology 91:3312–3321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockelman WY (1975) Competition, the fitness of offspring, and optimal clutch size. Am Nat 109:677–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cagniant H (1976) Distribution, écologie et nid de la fourmi Cataglyphis cursor Fonscolombe (Hyménoptères Formicidae). Vie Milieu 26:265–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerdá X, Retana J, Cros S (1997) Thermal disruption of transitive hierarchies in Mediterranean ant communities. J Anim Ecol 66(3):363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chéron B, Cronin A, Doums C, Fédérici P, Haussy C, Tirard C, Monnin T (2011) Unequal resource allocation among colonies produced by fission in the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Ecology 92(7):1448–1458. doi:10.1890/10-2347.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Clémencet J, Doums C (2007) Habitat-related microgeographic variation of worker size and colony size in the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Oecologia 152(2):211–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clémencet J, Viginier B, Doums C (2005) Hierarchical analysis of population genetic structure in the monogynous ant Cataglyphis cursor using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol Ecol 14(12):3735–3744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin AL, Monnin T, Haussy C, Doums C (2011) Opportunities for mate choice in the fission performing ant Cataglyphis cursor. Ecol Entomol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01291.x

  • Einum S, Hendry AP, Fleming IA (2002) Egg-size evolution in aquatic environments: does oxygen availability constrain size? Proc R Soc Lond B 269:2325–2330. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer K, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ (2003) Plasticity in butterfly egg size: why larger offspring at lower temperatures? Ecology 84:3138–3147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Czesak ME (2000) Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 45:341–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Mousseau TA (1996) Larval host plant affects fitness consequences of egg size variation in the seed beetle Stator limbatus. Oecologia 107(4):541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Thakar MS, Mousseau TA (1997) Egg size plasticity in a seed beetle: an adaptive maternal effect. Am Nat 149(1):149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2009) The super-organism. the beauty, elegance and strangeness of insect societies. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry AP, Day T, Cooper AB (2001) Optimal size and number of propagules: allowance for discrete stages and effects of maternal size on reproductive output and offspring fitness. Am Nat 157(4):387–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir A, Nowbahari E, Querard L, Pondicq N, Delalande C (1990) Habitat exploitation and intercolonial relationships in the ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Acta Oecol 11(1):3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir A, Quérard L, Pondicq N, Berton F (1988) Reproduction and dispersal in the ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Psyche 95(1–2):21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DJ, Cook CN, Emlet RB (2006) Offspring size effects mediate competitive interactions in a colonial marine invertebrate. Ecology 87(1):214–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molet M, van Baalen M, Peeters C (2008) Shift in colonial reproductive strategy associated with a tropical-temperate gradient in Rhytidoponera ants. Am Nat 172:75–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P (2000) Measuring and using skew in the study of social behavior and evolution. Am Nat 156:577–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson H, Ripa J, Jonzén N (2009) Bet-hedging as an evolutionary game: the trade-off between egg size and number. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2963–2969. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Begon M (1986) Optimal egg size and clutch size-effects of environment and maternal phenotype. Am Nat 128(4):573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr CL, Gibb H (2010) Competition and the role of dominant ants. In: Lach L, Parr C, Abbott K (eds) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 77–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy M, Aron S (2006) Local resource competition and sex ratio in the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Behav Ecol 17(4):569–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy M, Aron S, Doums C, Keller L (2004a) Conditional use of sex and parthenogenesis for worker and queen production in ants. Science 306:1780–1783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy M, Clémencet J, Chameron S, Aron S, Doums C (2004b) Characterization of nuclear DNA microsatellite markers in the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Mol Ecol Notes 4(4):642–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy M, Hardy O, Aron S (2006) Thelytokous parthenogenesis and its consequences on inbreeding in an ant. Heredity 96:377–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters C, Ito F (2001) Colony dispersal and the evolution of queen morphology in social Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 48:601–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters C, Molet M (2010) Colonial reproduction and life histories. In: Lach L, Parr C, Abbott K (eds) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Ratnieks FLW (2001) Heirs and spares: caste conflict and excess queen production in Melipona bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:467–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim JA, Nonacs P, Mangel M (1996) Sex ratios and multifaceted parental investment. Am Nat 148(3):501–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibly R, Calow P, Smith RH (1988) Optimal size of seasonal breeders. J Theor Biol 133(1):13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) Optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108(962):499–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML (1984) Seed variation in wild radish-effect of seed size on components of seedling and adult fitness. Ecology 65(4):1105–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR (2006) The fire ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenseleers T, Ratnieks FLW (2004) Tragedy of the commons in Melipona bees. Biol Lett 271:S310–S312

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Laboratoire Arago (Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls-sur-mer, Université Pierre et Marie Curie) for permitting this study to take place on the experimental grounds of the Mediterranean Garden of Mas de la Serre, and the Coast Conservation Office (“Conservatoire du littoral”) for allowing the collection of ‘competitive’ colonies in a protected bird nesting area in Saint Cyprien. We are very grateful to Laurent Belkadi, Nathalie Guillory, Claudy Haussy, David Laloi, Jean-Christophe Lenoir and Claire Tirard for help in erecting the enclosures. We also thank Mathieu Molet for help collecting and installing colonies and Peter Nonacs, Alain Lenoir and three anonymous referees for helpful comments on this and an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was funded by ANR-06-BLAN-0268.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam L. Cronin.

Additional information

Communicated by Jérome Casas.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 196 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cronin, A.L., Fédérici, P., Doums, C. et al. The influence of intraspecific competition on resource allocation during dependent colony foundation in a social insect. Oecologia 168, 361–369 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2098-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2098-6

Keywords

Navigation