Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What determines interspecific variation in relative growth rate of Eucalyptus seedlings?

  • Ecophysiology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examines relative growth rate (RGR) and its determinants in seedlings of nine Eucalyptus species. Species were selected from mesic (1,800 mm a−1 rainfall) through to semi-arid habitats (300 mm a−1), and thus, notionally vary in “stress” tolerance. Seedlings were grown in a glasshouse during early summer and received between 33 mol and 41 mol PAR m−2 day−1 . The mean RGR varied among species—from a minimum of 66 mg g−1 day−1 in E. hypochlamydea to a maximum of 106 mg g−1 day−1 in E. delegatensis. RGR was positively related to rainfall at the sites of seed collection. Neither specific leaf area (SLA) nor net assimilation rate was related to rainfall or RGR. While the absence of relationships with SLA and net assimilation rate contrasts with other studies and species, we cannot rule out the effects of sample size (n=9 species) and modest ranges in SLA and RGR. The ratio of leaf mass to total mass (LMR) varied from 0.49±0.07 g g−1 in E. socialis to 0.74±0.04 g g−1 in E. delegatensis and was strongly positively related with rainfall (r 2=0.77). Interspecific differences in RGR were strongly related to LMR (positive relationship, r 2=0.50) and the rate of dry matter production per mol of leaf nitrogen (positive relationship, r 2=0.64). Hence, the slow RGR of low-rainfall species was functionally related to a lower growth rate per mol of leaf nitrogen than high-rainfall species. Furthermore, slow RGR of low-rainfall species was related to greater allocation to roots at the expense of leaves. Increasing allocation to roots versus leaves is likely an adaptation to soil and atmospheric water deficits, but one that comes at the expense of a slow RGR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams MA, Attiwill PM (1982) Nitrate reductase activity and growth response of forest species to ammonium and nitrate sources of nitrogen. Plant Soil 66:373–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atkin OK, Schortemeyer M, McFarlane N, Evans JR (1998) Variation in the components of relative growth rate in ten Acacia species from contrasting environments. Plant Cell Environ 21:1007–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III (1991) Integrated response of plants to stress. Bioscience 41:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen JHC, Castro Diez P, Hunt R (1996) Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types. J Ecol 84:755–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen JHC, Werger MJA, Castro-Diez P, van Rheenan JWA, Rowland AP (1997) Foliar nutrients in relation to growth, allocation and leaf traits in seedlings of a wide range of woody plant species and types. Oecologia 111:460–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett TP, Smethurst PJ (1999) Ammonium and nitrate uptake by Eucalyptus nitens: effects of pH and temperature. Plant Soil 214:133–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E (1991) Resource capture, biomass allocation and growth in herbaceous plants. Trends Ecol Evol 6:126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Hunt R (1975) Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. J Ecol 63:393–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huante P, Rincón E, Acosta I (1995) Nutrient availability and growth rate of 34 woody species from a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Funct Ecol 9:849–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R, Parsons IT (1974) A computer program for deriving growth-functions in plant growth analysis. J Appl Ecol 11:297–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killingbeck KT, Whitford WG (1996) High foliar nitrogen in desert shrubs: an important ecosystem trait or defective desert doctrine? Ecology 77:1728–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H, Poorter H (1992) Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for ecological causes and consequences. Adv Ecol Res 23:187–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney HA, Ferrar PA, Slatyer RO (1978) Photosynthetic capacity and carbon allocation patterns in diverse growth forms of Eucalyptus. Oecologia 36:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pons TL, van der Werf A, Lambers H (1994) Photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency of inherently slow- and fast-growing species: possible explanations for observed differences. In: Roy E, Garnier E (eds), A whole plant Perspective on Carbon-Nitrogen Interactions. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 61–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter L (1999) Growth responses of 15 rain-forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits. Funct Ecol 13:396–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Evans JR (1998) Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area. Oecologia 116:26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Remkes C (1990) Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth. Oecologia 53:553–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Van der Werf A (1998) Is inherent variation in RGR determined by LAR at low irradiance and by NAR at high irradiance? A review of herbaceous species. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, Van Vuuren MMI (eds), Inherent variation in plant growth. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 309–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Remkes C, Lambers H (1990) Carbon and nitrogen economy of 24 species differing in relative growth rates. Plant Physiol 94:621–627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reich PB (1993) Reconciling apparent discrepancies among studies relating life-span, structure and function of leaves in contrasting plant life forms and climates – The blind men and the elephant retold. Funct Ecol 7:721–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1992) Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62:365–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryser R, Wahl S (2001) Interspecific variation in RGR and the underlying traits among 24 grass species grown in full daylight. Plant Biol 3:426–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saverimuttu T, Westoby M (1996) Components of variation in seedling potential relative growth rate: phylogenetically independent contrasts. Oecologia 105:281–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sefton CA, Montagu KD, Atwell BJ, Conroy JP (2002) Anatomical variation in juvenile eucalypt leaves accounts for differences in specific leaf area and CO2 assimilation rates. Aust J Bot 50:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B (2002) Trade-offs between net assimilation rate and specific leaf area in determining relative growth rate: relationship with daily irradiance. Funct Ecol 16:682–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skujins J (1981) Nitrogen cycling in arid ecosystems. In: Clark FE, Rosswall T (eds), Terrestrial nitrogen cycles: Processes, Ecosystem Strategies and Management Impacts. Swedish National Research Council, Stockholm, pp. 477–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenendaal EM, Swaine MD, Lecha RT, Walsh MF, Abebrese IK, Owusu-Afriyie K (1996) Responses of west African forest tree seedlings to irradiance and soil fertility. Funct Ecol 10:501–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters MB, Kruger EL, Reich PB (1993) Relative growth rate in relation to physiological and morphological traits for northern hardwood tree seedlings: species, light environment and ontogenetic considerations. Oecologia 96:219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren CR, Adams MA (2000) Trade-offs between the persistence of foliage and productivity in two Pinus species. Oecologia 124:487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren CR, Adams MA (2004a) Evergreen trees do not maximize photosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci 9:270–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warren CR, Adams MA (2004b) What determines rates of photosynthesis per unit nitrogen in seedlings of Eucalyptus species? Functional Plant Biology (in press)

  • Warren CR, Livingston NJ, Turpin DH (2003) Responses of gas exchange to reversible changes in whole-plant transpiration rate in two conifer species. Tree Physiol 23:793–803

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warren CR, Livingston NJ, Turpin DH (2004) Water stress decreases transfer conductance of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.)Franco) seedlings. Tree Physiol 24:971–979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West NE (1981) Nutrient cycling in desert ecosystems arid-land ecosystems. In: Goodall DW, Pearcy RA (eds) Structure, functioning and management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright IJ, et al. (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright IJ, Westoby M (1999) Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species: trait correlations across species, and trait shifts along nutrient compared to rainfall gradients. J Ecol 87:85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright IJ, Westoby M (2000) Cross-species relationships between seedling relative growth rate, nitrogen productivity and root vs leaf function in 28 Australian woody species. Funct Ecol 14:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright IJ, Westoby M (2001) Understanding seedling growth relationships through specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration: generalisations across growth forms and growth irradiance. Oecologia 127:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M (2001) Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Funct Ecol 15:423–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the Australian Research Council. Frank Jones is thanked for expert technical assistance. We gratefully acknowledge the constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles R. Warren.

Additional information

Communicated by Christian Koerner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warren, C.R., Adams, M.A. What determines interspecific variation in relative growth rate of Eucalyptus seedlings?. Oecologia 144, 373–381 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0092-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0092-6

Keywords

Navigation