Introduction

Congenital diarrheas and enteropathies (CODEs) constitute a heterogeneous group of individually rare disorders manifesting with devastating chronic diarrhea in infancy. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies have improved our understanding of the genetic architecture underlying CODEs, and accurate and timely molecular diagnoses are within reach (Thiagarajah et al. 2018; Ye et al. 2019; Esposito et al. 2021). An increasingly recognized subgroup of CODEs is caused by genetic defects affecting the enteroendocrine cells (EECs), collectively the largest endocrine organ in the body (Caralli et al. 2021; Sanchez et al. 2022). The identification of EE dysfunction as the basis of congenital diarrhea opens up the potential for novel therapeutic strategies in these patients.

Intractable Diarrhea of Infancy Syndrome (IDIS) had long been recognized as a congenital diarrheal disorder mainly affecting families of Iraqi-Jewish descent (Avery et al. 1968; Straussberg et al. 1997), however, its molecular basis remained elusive. In 2019, we identified genomic deletions in chromosome 16, encompassing a sequence which we termed the ‘intestine-critical region (ICR)’, as the cause of IDIS (Oz-Levi et al. 2019). The regulatory sequence within the ICR is flanked by an unannotated open reading frame, Proline- and Glutamate-Rich Protein with Coiled-Coil Domain 1 (PERCC1), which was not yet recognized as a coding gene. Mice harboring targeted deletion of either the ICR or Percc1 recapitulated the human phenotype. Finally, we showed that PERCC1 is critical for the function of EECs, elucidating the pathomechanism underlying IDIS.

Since the 2019 original description of eight affected individuals of seven unrelated families, only one additional affected individual was subsequently reported, presenting with diarrhea, failure to thrive, and parenteral nutrition (PN)-dependent intestinal failure (Maddirevula et al. 2020). Positional mapping and transcriptome sequencing identified a genomic deletion encompassing a regulatory element of PERCC1 as the cause of disease. To date, however, no pathogenic single nucleotide variants in PERCC1 have been reported in human disease.

We present herein a point mutation in PERCC1 in association with a congenital enteropathy in two unrelated probands of Irish descent and discuss their molecular and phenotypic features.

Methods

Editorial policies and ethical considerations

The study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Sheba Medical Center and the Ethics Committee at Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin. Written informed consent was obtained from the adult patient or minor patient’s guardian for publication of clinical and molecular data.

Clinical data and sample collection

Clinical details were obtained from the patients' medical files. Whole blood samples were obtained from each participant into a 5 ml EDTA tube. DNA samples were extracted using automatic device MagNa Pure LC system. Concentrations and purity were measured on the Nanodrop ND-1000 instrument (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE).

Analysis for deletions

Initially, specific analysis for the two deletions encompassing the ICR was performed for each proband, as previously described (Oz-Levi et al. 2019). In brief, a multiplex PCR assay was performed for each of the two deletions. The boundaries of the long (ΔL) and short (ΔS) deletions, as previously determined using long PCR and Sanger sequencing, are: Chr16:1475369-1482326 and Chr16:1480850-1483951, respectively, yielding deletions of 6957 bp and 3101 bp, overlapping by 1476 bp. For the multiplex PCR, two PCRs were run: one long PCR yielding a band for a heterozygote subject, and one internal PCR designed to yield no band in case of a homozygote subject.

Sanger sequencing and mutation analysis

PCR was carried out in a 25 µl reaction containing 50 ng of DNA, 10 pmol of each primer, ddH2O and Red Load Taq Master*5 (LAEOVA). After an initial denaturation of 5 min at 95 °C, 35 cycles were performed (94 °C for 30 s, 56–60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s), followed by a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. The F-5′ GCGCCTGCACAAACACTCCA 3′, R-5′ GCCCAGTGGTCTGGGGGTCT 3′ primer set was used for amplifying the PERCC1 non-coding exon 1 and the F-5′ ATCCGAGGGCAGCAGTCGAG 3′, R-5′ CCTTAGGGGTGGCCCTGCTG 3’ primer set was used for amplifying the coding sequence (exon 2). Sanger sequencing was performed at the Molecular Biology Service Laboratory, Hy-labs (Rehovot, Israel).

Gastrin level measurement

Gastrin level were measured at two time points: First, from blood sample obtained from the patient after 8 h fast, and second, from blood samples obtained one hour after a small meal.

Patient and public involvement

Both patients were selected for genetic testing of the ICR and PERCC1 based on their chronic intestinal failure for which no cause had been identified. The rationale, risks and benefits of this targeted genetic testing was discussed with the patients and (for the minor patient) their parents. Following identification of the point mutation, patients and parents participated in discussions with the clinical team regarding best next steps from both a clinical and research perspective, thus leading to measurement of fasting and post-prandial serum gastrin levels, and the joint decision to publish these cases in a journal and present the findings for discussion at conferences with the wider medical community.

Results

We encountered two unrelated Irish patients, recruited at the National Centre for Pediatric Gastroenterology, CHI-Crumlin, both suffering from a CODE of unknown etiology. Their clinical, laboratory and molecular characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinical, laboratory and molecular characteristics of two unrelated individuals harboring a disease-causing nonsense variant in PERCC1

Clinical presentations

Patient A is a 12 year-old male, born to non-consanguineous parents of mixed Irish/Sri-Lankan/Malaysian descent (father Irish; mother 1/2 Irish, 1/4 Sri-Lankan, 1/4 Malaysian), with one healthy older sibling and two half-siblings. He was born weighing 3.18 kg following an uncomplicated term pregnancy and presented aged 3 weeks with watery diarrhea and hypernatremic dehydration. He underwent extensive investigations (Table 1), including negative trio-based exome sequencing (ES), and endoscopic biopsies which showed normal chromogranin A and synaptophysin staining and normal enteroendocrine cell (EEC) number (5–6 per crypt). Investigations did not support a metabolic or mitochondrial disorder. He is cognitively normal and growing appropriately on home parenteral nutrition (4 nights per week, 67 non-protein calories/kg, 56 ml/kg). He is hyperphagic and has a diverse diet but has 5–7 steatorrheal (298 g fat/day) stools per day. Serum gastrin levels were low and failed to respond to meal challenge [fasting and post-prandial gastrin 34 and < 33 ng/L, respectively (normal range 33–85 ng/L)].

Patient B is a 19 year-old male, born to consanguineous parents (first cousins) of Irish ethnicity. He presented at 2 weeks of age with watery diarrhea and hypernatremic dehydration following an uncomplicated pregnancy, birth weight 3.04 kg. Diarrhea resolved on cessation of oral feeds, and extensive investigations failed to identify a cause (Table 1). He is cognitively normal and has reached an adult height of 179.1 cm (75th centile). He is tapering his home PN regime, currently on PN 1 night/week (15 non-protein calories, 32 ml/kg) with a diverse oral diet, passing 3–5 loose stools/day. Serum gastrin levels were low and failed to respond to meal challenge [fasting and post-prandial gastrin 24 and 22 mU/L, respectively (normal range 23–113 mU/L)]. Single (proband only) exome sequencing was negative.

Molecular analysis

Because of our previous work describing ICR deletions as the genetic cause of IDIS (Oz-Levi et al. 2019), we applied the candidate gene approach to seek pathogenic variants in this region. Both patients were found to be wildtype for the reported deletions. Since the reported deletions regulate PERCC1, we next performed Sanger sequencing of its coding region and intron boundaries (NM_001365310.2) and found a novel c.390C > G (p.Y130X) stop gain variant in PERCC1. The variant was found in homozygous state in both patients, and in heterozygous state in the available parents (both parents of Patient A, and the mother of Patient B).

Frequency of the PERCC1 variant in public databases

The variant frequency in gnomAD v3, was 12 alleles among 152,240 individuals (0.00007). These included eleven heterozygous carriers from the European population and one from the Latino-American population. No homozygote individuals were identified.

Discussion

The role of EEC dysfunction in diarrhea is an evolving field of particular relevance to patients with CODEs. Elucidation of the molecular basis of CODEs may not only provide insights on the roles of mutated genes in EEC differentiation and human gastrointestinal tract development, but may also shed light on more common disorders in which EECs are implicated, including obesity and diabetes (Gribble and Reimann 2019). Our findings provide the first description of a disease-associated point mutation in PERCC1 in humans, complement our previous work implicating deletion of ICR in the etiology of CODEs and confirm that PERCC1 is indeed a previously-unrecognized gene of clinical significance.

Importantly, while PERCC1 has recently been cataloged in OMIM (MIM:618656), it remains unannotated in the hg19 built and is not covered by the most common exome enrichment kits currently in use. Thus, additional affected individuals undergoing exome sequencing will remain undiagnosed. It is noteworthy that both of the only two children with idiopathic congenital diarrhea attending the Irish National Intestinal Failure Program had PERCC1 mutations. This suggests that PERCC1 mutation may be a common cause of idiopathic CODEs worldwide, or that it is a founder mutation in the Irish population. While we were not able to determine this experimentally, future population-based genetic studies and reports of PERCC1 testing in other CODE patients will shed some light on this.

In our original publication describing the first PERCC1-associated phenotype (Oz-Levi et al. 2019), we established a link between loss of PERCC1 expression and EEC dysfunction. mRNA in situ hybridization of wildtype mice and examination of transgenic mice encoding a PERCC1-mCherry fusion protein indicated that Percc1-expressing cells were primarily EECs (including gastrin-secreting G cells in the stomach) in early fetal development. Further supporting the link between PERCC1 and EEC function, RNAseq data revealed that Percc1 knockout mice had significant reductions in Gastrin, Somatostatin and Ghrelin expression, as well as low serum gastrin levels. Consistent with these observations, an interesting clinical finding shared by both probands reported herein is that of low serum gastrin levels during fasting, which fail to respond to a meal challenge. Chromogranin A/synaptophysin staining in patient A did not demonstrate a reduction in intestinal EEC numbers. This is consistent with our previous effort, demonstrating increased immunoreactivity to Chromogranin A in biopsies obtained from the duodenal villi and stomach pyloric mucosae of two patients of the original cohort harboring the ΔL/ΔL deletion of ICR, when compared to healthy controls, as well as similar findings in the chr17ΔICR/ΔICR mouse model (unpublished data). These findings suggest that EECs do form in early development in these patients, but it is their disrupted subsequent differentiation to EEC subtypes and their dysfunction that underlies the pathomechanism of this disorder. We can further speculate that the low gastrin levels seen in our current two patients may be an incidental marker of general EEC dysfunction, and that it is the intestinal EEC dysfunction which contributes to the clinical phenotype of diarrhea and intestinal failure. However, the mechanistic relevance of the clinical finding of low serum gastrin and its potential as a diagnostic clue in CODEs remain to be elucidated in further studies.

The c.390C > G variant observed in our two patients is a stop gain variant in the gene, where loss of function according to our original report is the mechanism of the disease. As PERCC1 is expressed only in the earlier developmental stage, functional studies using patient-derived cells were not readily available. Recently, evolutionary bioinformatic analysis of PERCC1 suggested that it is a member of the YAP/TAZ/FAM181 family of homologous transcriptional regulators (Sanchez-Pulido et al. 2022). Future studies utilizing induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived intestinal organoids and in vivo models would shed light on the yet-unanswered question of the precise role of PERCC1 and its pathomechanistic underpinnings in human disease. Additionally, with the advent of enteroendocrine hormone analog treatments and better understanding of the mechanisms underlying diarrhea/malabsorption when these hormones are not produced, putative targeted therapeutic interventions can already be contemplated for patients with intestinal failure caused by EEC dysfunction (e.g. Glucagon-Like Peptide (GLP)-1 analogs, recently reported to improve malabsorptive diarrhea in patients with Mitchell-Riley syndrome (Nóbrega et al. 2021)).

While historically the clinical entity of autosomal recessive congenital diarrhea in families of Iraqi-Jewish descent was designated ‘Intractable Diarrhea of Infancy Syndrome’ (IDIS), in light of our findings and in line with current shifts in the nomenclature of genetic disorders, we suggest that this entity be termed ‘PERCC1-associated congenital enteropathy’. This term can apply to patients with either point mutations in PERCC1 or genomic deletions regulating the gene.

To conclude, we report herein clinical and molecular findings in two unrelated patients harboring a shared homozygous variant in PERCC1, comprising the first description of a point mutation in this gene in association with CODE.