Skip to main content
Log in

Twofold symmetries in nucleotide distribution in large domains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chromosome I

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Molecular Genetics and Genomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single stranded chains of biological DNA show a widespread occurrence of parity for complementary nucleotides, i.e., A=T, G=C. This has been referred to as A-T, G-C symmetry. A distinction must be made between this, which this paper calls mirror symmetry, and twofold symmetry, where complementary nucleotide parity occurs between two segments, of the same length and equidistant from a symmetry center, along a single-stranded DNA chain. I have analysed the sequence of Chromosome I of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the occurrence of complementary nucleotide symmetry. Open reading frame (ORF) sequences made up 63% of the total chromosome length and most of them were asymmetric for both A-T and G-C. The sign of A-T asymmetry was correlated with transcriptional orientation (A>T for sense and A<T for antisense ORFs), whereas G-C asymmetry was not. However, long single-stranded segments of Chromosome I were A-T mirror symmetric because they contained similar frequencies of ORFs in both transcriptional orientations. The same results were obtained with the AA-TT pair of complementary dinucleotides. Profiling of AA-TT symmetry along Chromosome I showed this chromosome to be organized as a succession of five domains that were twofold symmetric for AA-TT, placed between two subtelomeric regions without clear symmetry properties. This pattern was destroyed when ORF sequences were randomly repositioned along the chromosome. Based on the above findings, an architectural model is proposed for Chromosome I, in which the twofold symmetric domains, from 30 to 50 kb long, correspond to chromosome loops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3A–D
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell SJ, Forsdyke DR (1999a) Accounting units in DNA. J Theor Biol 197:51–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell SJ, Forsdyke DR (1999b) Deviations from Chargaff’s second parity rule correlate with direction of transcription. J Theor Biol 197:63–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer BJ (1988) When polymerases collide: replication and the transcriptional organization of the E. coli chromosome. Cell 53:679–686

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradnam KR, Seoighe C, Sharp PM, Wolfe KH (1999) G+C content variation along and among Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes. Mol Biol Evol 16:666–675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bussey H, Kaback DB, Zhong WW, Vo DT, Clark MW, Fortin N, Hall J, Ouellette BFF, Keng T, Barton AB, Su Y, Davies CJ, Storms RK (1995) The nucleotide sequence of chromosome I from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:3809–3813

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calladine CR, Drew HR (1997) Understanding DNA. Academic Press, San Diego

  • Cebrat S, Dudek MR, Rogowska A (1997) Asymmetry in nucleotide composition of sense and antisense strands as a parameter for discriminating open reading frames as protein coding sequences. J Appl Genet 38:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Fickett JW, Torney DC, Wolf DR (1992) Base compositional structure of genomes. Genomics 13:1056–1064

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1995) Relative roles of primary sequences and (G+C)% in determining the hierarchy of frequencies of complementary trinucleotide pairs. J Mol Evol 41:573–581

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francino MP, Chao L, Riley MA, Ochman H (1996) Asymmetries generated by transcription-coupled repair in enterobacterial genes. Science 272:107–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert DG (1999) Free software in molecular biology for Macintosh and MS Windows computers. In: Misener S, Krawetz SA (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.

  • Langkjaer RB, Nielsen ML, Daugaard PR, Liu W, Piskur J (2000) Yeast chromosomes have been significantly reshaped during their evolutionary history. J Mol Biol 304:271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Stolovitzky G, Bernaola-Galvan P, Oliver JL (1998) Compositional heterogeneity within, and uniformity between, DNA sequences of yeast chromosomes. Genome Res 8:916–928

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Llorente B, et al (2000) Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts: 18. Comparative analysis of chromosome maps and synteny with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 487:101–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lobry JR (1995) Properties of a general model of DNA evolution under no-strand bias conditions. J Mol Evol 40:326–330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lobry JR (1996) Asymmetric substitution patterns in the two DNA strands of bacteria. Mol Biol Evol 13:660–665

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manuelidis L, Chen TL (1990) A unified model of eukaryotic chromosomes. Cytometry 11:8–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mewes HW, Frishman D, Güldener U, Mannhaupt D, Mayer K, Mokrejs M, Morgenstern B, Münsterkoetter M, Rudd S, Weil B (2002) MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 30:31–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu VV (1993) Symmetry observations in long nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 21:2797–2800

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raghuraman MK, Winzeler EA, Collingwood D, Hunt S, Wodicka L, Conway A, Lockhart DJ, Davis RW, Brewer BJ, Fangman WL (2001) Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294:115–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000) EMBOSS: The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 16:276–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudner R, Karkas JD, Chargaff E (1968) Separation of B. subtilis DNA into complementary strands: III. Direct analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 60:921–922

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saitoh Y, Laemmli UK (1994) Metaphase chromosome structure: bands arise from a differential folding path of the highly AT-rich scaffold. Cell 76:609–622

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seoighe C, et al (2000) Prevalence of small inversions in yeast gene order evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:14433–14437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sueoka N (1995) Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons. J Mol Evol 40:318–325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe KH, Shields DC (1997) Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387:708–713

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank J. Navarro for generously programming Cripto

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Conde.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Cerdà-Olmedo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conde, J. Twofold symmetries in nucleotide distribution in large domains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chromosome I. Mol Genet Genomics 270, 287–295 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-003-0871-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-003-0871-x

Keywords

Navigation