Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phylogenetic relationships and new genetic tools for the detection and discrimination of the three feline Demodex mites

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two feline Demodex mite species have been described as causative agents of feline demodicosis, until recently a third species was detected. We provide an updated analysis on the phylogenetic relationship of Demodex mites. In addition, we present the first qPCR assay for the detection and differentiation of all three feline mite species in a single reaction. Specimen of Demodex cati, Demodex gatoi, and the recently discovered third species were collected from skin scrapings and fecal flotation for DNA extraction, conventional PCR, sequencing, and alignment. A total of 24 sequences of the partial 16S rRNA gene were used to estimate the evolutionary divergence in a p-distance model and a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree. For the qPCR assay, new primers and fluorescent probes for the simultaneous detection of all three feline Demodex mites were designed. A consensus fragment of 351 bp was phylogenetically analyzed. The third species sequence of our study shares 98.6 % similarity to the available sequence in GenBank®. It is most similar to D. gatoi (82.41 %) and most distant to the canine Demodex injai (78.28 %). In contrast, D. gatoi is most similar to human Demodex brevis (87.01 %). The multiplex qPCR detected and discriminated the three different mite species in one reaction. The detection limit is ≤1.4 ng of mite DNA. The three feline Demodex species have distinct genotypes and did not cluster in one genetic clade. The species differentiation and assessment of evolutionary relationships will ultimately support correct diagnostics and treatment approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beale K (2012) Feline demodicosis: a consideration in the itchy or overgrooming cat. J Feline Med Surg 14:209–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein JA, Frank LA, Kania SA (2014) PCR amplification and DNA sequence identification of an unusual morphological form of Demodex cati in a cat. Vet Dermatol 25(5):487-e80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Black WC 4th, Piesman J (1994) Phylogeny of hard- and soft-tick taxa (Acari: Ixodida) based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:10034–10038

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney CJ (1988) An unusual species of demodex mite in a cat. Vet Rec 123:671–673

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney CJ (1999) Short form of Demodex species mite in the dog: occurrence and measurements. J Small Anim Pract 40:58–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desch CE Jr, Stewart TB (1999) Demodex gatoi: new species of hair follicle mite (Acari: Demodecidae) from the domestic cat (Carnivora: Felidae). J Med Entomol 36:167–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank LA, Kania SA, Chung K, Brahmbhatt R (2013) A molecular technique for the detection and differentiation of Demodex mites on cats. Vet Dermatol 24:367–9, e82–3

  • Kano R, Hyuga A, Matsumoto J, Nogami S, Nemoto S, Hasegawa A, Kamata H (2012) Feline demodicosis caused by an unnamed species. Res Vet Sci 92:257–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laffort C (2010) Itchy contagious feline demodicosis due to Demodex gatoi. Point Vet 41:12–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein C, Beck W, Bessmann K, Mueller RS (2005) Feline demodicosis caused by concurrent infestation with Demodex cati and an unnamed species of mite. Vet Rec 157:290–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucio-Forster A, Bowman DD (2011) Prevalence of fecal-borne parasites detected by centrifugal flotation in feline samples from two shelters in upstate New York. J Feline Med Surg 13:300–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moriello KA, Newbury S, Steinberg H (2013) Five observations of a third morphologically distinct feline Demodex mite. Vet Dermatol 24(4):460–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris DO (1996) Contagious demodicosis in three cats residing in a common household. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 32:350–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen G, O’Connor B (2002) Mites (Acari). Med Vet Entomol 449–516

  • Navajas M, Fenton B (2000) The application of molecular markers in the study ofdiversity in acarology: a review. Exp Appl Acarol 24:751–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neel JA, Tarigo J, Tater KC, Grindem CB (2007) Deep and superficial skin scrapings from a feline immunodeficiency virus-positive cat. Vet Clin Pathol 36:101–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norris DE, Klompen JSH, Black WC (1999) Comparison of the mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal DNA genes in resolving phylogenetic relationships among hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 92:117–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson S (2006) Skin diseases of exotic pets. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perego R, Proverbio D, Bagnagatti De Giorgi G, Della Pepa A, Spada E (2013) Prevalence of otitis externa in stray cats in northern Italy. J Feline Med Surg 16:483–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ravera I, Altet L, Francino O, Bardagi M, Sanchez A, Ferrer L (2011) Development of a real-time PCR to detect Demodex canis DNA in different tissue samples. Parasitol Res 108:305–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ravera I, Altet L, Francino O, Sanchez A, Roldan W, Villanueva S, Bardagi M, Ferrer L (2013) Small Demodex populations colonize most parts of the skin of healthy dogs. Vet Dermatol 24:168–72.e37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reitemeyer S, Kohn B (2002) Demodicosis in the cat. Prakt Tierarzt 83:594–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Saari SA, Juuti KH, Palojarvi JH, Vaisanen KM, Rajaniemi RL, Saijonmaa-Koulumies LE (2009) Demodex gatoi-associated contagious pruritic dermatosis in cats—a report from six households in Finland. Acta Vet Scand 51:40

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sastre N, Ravera I, Villanueva S, Altet L, Bardagi M, Sanchez A, Francino O, Ferrer L (2012) Phylogenetic relationships in three species of canine Demodex mite based on partial sequences of mitochondrial 16S rDNA. Vet Dermatol 23:509-e101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silbermayr K, Joachim A, Litschauer B, Panakova L, Sastre N, Ferrer L, Horvath-Ungerboeck C (2013) The first case of Demodex gatoi in Austria, detected with fecal flotation. Parasitol Res 112(8):2805–2810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toops E, Blagburn B, Lenaghan S, Kennis R, MacDonald J, Dykstra C (2010) Extraction and characterization of DNA from Demodex canis. Int J Appl Res Vet Med 8:31–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YE, Cheng J, Hu L, Ma JX (2014) Molecular identification and phylogenetic study of Demodex caprae. Parasitol Res 113:3601–3608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Walpurga Wille-Piazzai for technical support, Dr. Moriello for providing sample material, and Lucia Panakova and Barbara Litschauer for clinical assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Silbermayr.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

Genetic matrix of the pairwise-distances in a p-distance model in % similarity (DOCX 37 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silbermayr, K., Horvath-Ungerboeck, C., Eigner, B. et al. Phylogenetic relationships and new genetic tools for the detection and discrimination of the three feline Demodex mites. Parasitol Res 114, 747–752 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4243-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4243-8

Keywords

Navigation