Abstract
Objective
Since prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) was recognized as a separate entity in the 2016 revised classification of MPN differed from essential thrombocythemia (ET) or overt fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (overt PMF), it has been a subject of debate among experts due to its indefinite diagnosis.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical parameters, haematologic information, and genetic mutations of patients who were diagnosed with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) according to the WHO 2016 criteria in China, including 56 ET patients, 19 pre-PMF patients, and 43 overt PMF patients.
Results
Pre-PMF patients exhibited higher leukocyte counts [14.2(6.0–28.1) × 109/L vs 9.6(4.0–55.0) × 109/L, P = 0.003], LDH values [307(233–479)U/L vs 241(129–1182)U/L, P < 0.001], onset ages [67(32–76) years vs 50(16–79) years, P = 0.006], a higher frequency of splenomegaly(47.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.018) and hypertension (57.9 vs 23.2%, P = 0.005) than ET patients. On the other hand, pre-PMF patients had higher platelet counts [960(500–2245) × 109/L vs 633(102–1720) × 109/L, P = 0.017], haemoglobin levels [152(115–174)g/L vs 119(71–200)g/L, P = 0.003], lower LDH values [307(233–479)U/L vs 439(134–8100)U/L, P = 0.007] and a lower frequency of splenomegaly(47.4 vs 75.6%, P = 0.031) than overt PMF patients. Next-generation sequencing landscape was performed in 50 patients, revealed the frequency of EP300 mutations was significantly increased in pre-PMF patients compared with ET and overt PMF patients (60 vs 10 vs 15.79%, P = 0.033), and WT1 was more often overexpressed (WT1/ABL1 copies ≥ 1.0%) in patients with overt PMF than in those with ET or pre-PMF(54.55 vs 16.67 vs 17.65%, P = 0.009). In terms of outcome, male sex, along with symptoms including MPN10, anaemia (haemoglobin < 120 g/L), thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100 × 109/L), leucocytosis (leukocyte counts > 13 × 109/L), high LDH value (> 350U/L), splenomegaly, WT1 overexpression(WT1/ABL1 copies ≥ 1.0%), KMT2A, ASXL1 and TP53 mutations, indicated a poor prognosis for PMF patients.
Conclusion
The results of this study indicated that a comprehensive evaluation of BM features, clinical phenotypes, haematologic parameters, and molecular profiles is needed for the accurate diagnosis and treatment of ET, pre-PMF, and overt PMF patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Andersen CL, Hasselbalch H, Grønbæk K (2012) Lack of somatic mutations in the catalytic domains of CREBBP and EP300 genes implies a role for histone deacetylase inhibition in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leuk Res 36:485–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2011.11.018
Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R et al (2016) The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 127:2391–2405. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544
Ariyaratana S, Loeb DM (2007) The role of the Wilms tumour gene (WT1) in normal and malignant haematopoiesis. Expert Rev Mol Med 9:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1462399407000336
Attar N, Kurdistani SK (2017) Exploitation of EP300 and CREBBP lysine acetyltransferases by cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a026534
Barbui T, Thiele J, Passamonti F et al (2011) Survival and disease progression in essential thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by accurate morphologic diagnosis: an international study. J Clin Oncol 29:3179–3184. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.34.5298
Barbui T, Thiele J, Vannucchi AM et al (2016) Myeloproliferative neoplasms: morphology and clinical practice. Am J Hematol 91:430–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24288
Barbui T, Thiele J, Gisslinger H et al (2018) The 2016 WHO classification and diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms: document summary and in-depth discussion. Blood Cancer J 8:15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-018-0054-y
Barosi G, Rosti V, Bonetti E et al (2012) Evidence that prefibrotic myelofibrosis is aligned along a clinical and biological continuum featuring primary myelofibrosis. PLoS ONE 7:e35631. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035631
Berasain C, Herrero JI, García-Trevijano ER et al (2003) Expression of Wilms’ tumor suppressor in the liver with cirrhosis: relation to hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 and hepatocellular function. Hepatology 38:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50269
Chapuis AG, Egan DN, Bar M et al (2019) T cell receptor gene therapy targeting WT1 prevents acute myeloid leukemia relapse post-transplant. Nat Med 25:1064–1072. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0472-9
Cilloni D, Renneville A, Hermitte F et al (2009) Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction detection of minimal residual disease by standardized WT1 assay to enhance risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia: a European LeukemiaNet study. J Clin Oncol 27:5195–5201. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.22.4865
Cottin L, Riou J, Boyer F et al (2019) WT1 gene is overexpressed in myeloproliferative neoplasms, especially in myelofibrosis. Blood Cells Mol Dis 75:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2018.12.004
Edahiro Y, Araki M, Inano T et al (2019) Clinical and molecular features of patients with prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis previously diagnosed as having essential thrombocythemia in Japan. Eur J Haematol 102:516–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13236
Gallo D, Nicoli P, Calabrese C et al (2016) The Wilms’ tumor (WT1) gene expression correlates with the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) score in patients with myelofibrosis and it is. Cancer Med 5:1650–1653. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.735
Gillum RF, Mussolino ME (1994) White blood cell count and hypertension incidence. The NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. J Clin Epidemiol 47:911–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90195-3
Guglielmelli P, Pacilli A, Rotunno G et al (2017) Presentation and outcome of patients with 2016 WHO diagnosis of prefibrotic and overt primary myelofibrosis. Blood 129:3227–3236. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-01-761999
Haber DA, Sohn RL, Buckler AJ et al (1991) Alternative splicing and genomic structure of the Wilms tumor gene WT1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:9618–9622. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.21.9618
Huang YH, Cai K, Xu PP et al (2021) CREBBP/EP300 mutations promoted tumor progression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma through altering tumor-associated macrophage polarization via FBXW7-NOTCH-CCL2/CSF1 axis. Signal Transduct Target Ther 6:10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00437-8
Hussein K, Bock O, Theophile K et al (2009) JAK2(V617F) allele burden discriminates essential thrombocythemia from a subset of prefibrotic-stage primary myelofibrosis. Exp Hematol 37:1186-1193.e1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2009.07.005
Jeryczynski G, Thiele J, Gisslinger B et al (2017) Pre-fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia: the impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease. Am J Hematol 92:885–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24788
Meyer SN, Scuoppo C, Vlasevska S et al (2019) Unique and shared epigenetic programs of the CREBBP and EP300 acetyltransferases in germinal center B cells reveal targetable dependencies in lymphoma. Immunity 51:535-547.e539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2019.08.006
Mudireddy M, Shah S, Lasho T et al (2018) Prefibrotic versus overtly fibrotic primary myelofibrosis: clinical, cytogenetic, molecular and prognostic comparisons. Br J Haematol 182:594–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14838
Muntean AG, Hess JL (2012) The pathogenesis of mixed-lineage leukemia. Annu Rev Pathol 7:283–301. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-011811-132434
Palandri F, Latagliata R, Polverelli N et al (2015) Mutations and long-term outcome of 217 young patients with essential thrombocythemia or early primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia 29:1344–1349. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.87
Rack KA, van den Berg E, Haferlach C et al (2019) European recommendations and quality assurance for cytogenomic analysis of haematological neoplasms. Leukemia 33:1851–1867. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0378-z
Raza S, Viswanatha D, Frederick L et al (2012) TP53 mutations and polymorphisms in primary myelofibrosis. Am J Hematol 87:204–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.22216
Rumi E, Boveri E, Bellini M et al (2017) Clinical course and outcome of essential thrombocythemia and prefibrotic myelofibrosis according to the revised WHO 2016 diagnostic criteria. Oncotarget 8:101735–101744. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21594
Saika M, Inoue D, Nagase R et al (2018) ASXL1 and SETBP1 mutations promote leukaemogenesis by repressing TGFβ pathway genes through histone deacetylation. Sci Rep 8:15873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33881-2
Sakairi T, Abe Y, Kopp JB (2011) TGF-beta1 reduces Wilms’ tumor suppressor gene expression in podocytes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26:2746–2752. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr061
Steensma DP, Pardanani A, Stevenson WS et al (2006) More on Myb in myelofibrosis: molecular analyses of MYB and EP300 in 55 patients with myeloproliferative disorders. Blood 107:1733–1735. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-09-3646 (author reply 1735)
Tefferi A, Barbui T (2020) Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol 95:1599–1613. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26008
Teodorescu P, Pasca S, Jurj A et al (2020) Transforming growth factor β-mediated micromechanics modulates disease progression in primary myelofibrosis. J Cell Mol Med 24:11100–11110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15526
Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Müllauer L et al (2011) Essential thrombocythemia versus early primary myelofibrosis: a multicenter study to validate the WHO classification. Blood 117:5710–5718. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-07-293761
Venton G, Courtier F, Charbonnier A et al (2018) Impact of gene mutations on treatment response and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms. Am J Hematol 93:330–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24973
Xi L, Hao Y, Liu J et al (2015) Relationship between leukocyte count and risk of hypertension. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 43:312–318
Yang L, Han Y, Suarez Saiz F et al (2007) A tumor suppressor and oncogene: the WT1 story. Leukemia 21:868–876. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404624
Young K, Loberg MA, Eudy E et al (2020) Heritable genetic background alters survival and phenotype of Mll-AF9-induced leukemias. Exp Hematol 89:61-67.e63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2020.07.012
Funding
The research was supported by the Key R&D Program of Zhejiang, No. 2022C03137; Public Technology Application Research Program of Zhejiang, China, No. LGF21H080003; the Key Project of Jinhua Science and Technology Plan, China, No. 2020-3-011; the 2019–2024 Academician Workstation of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of the Zhejiang University School of Medicine; the 2019–2022 Key Medical Discipline (Hematology) Fund of Jinhua, China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LZ, XY and SL designed the study, performed the research and wrote the manuscript; XX, SW and KJ collected and analyzed the data; YZ, XZ and DC completed the follow-up; JJ edited the paper; JH reviewed and revised the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, L., Ye, X., Luo, S. et al. Clinical features and next-generation sequencing landscape of essential thrombocythemia, prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis, and overt fibrotic primary myelofibrosis: a Chinese monocentric retrospective study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149, 2383–2392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04067-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04067-1