Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical evaluation of in vitro chemosensitivity testing: the example of uveal melanoma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Results from in vitro chemosensitivity testing recommend treosulfan/gemcitabine chemotherapy for the treatment of stage IV uveal melanoma.

Methods

Twenty patients received treosulfan 3,500 mg/m2 followed by gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 repeated on day 29. In cases of prior chemotherapy only 75% of these dosages were used.

Results

Without any patient achieving an objective response, 25% of patients (95% confidence interval, 8.6–49.1%) had stabilisation of disease. This stabilisation was associated with a prolonged median overall survival of 17 months compared with 7 months for the patients with progressive disease. First-line treatment was not associated with better response or survival although prognostic parameters did not significantly differ from that of other patients.

Conclusions

The results are disappointing and question the value of individualized chemotherapy based on in vitro assays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker JC, Terheyden P, Kämpgen E, Wagner S, Neumann C, Schadendorf D, Steinmann A, Wittenberg G, Lieb W, Bröcker EB (2002) Treatment of disseminated ocular melanoma with sequential fotemustine, interferon alpha, and interleukin 2. Br J Cancer 87:840–845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bedikian AY, Legha SS, Mavligit G, Carrasco CH, Khorana S, Plager C, Papadopoulos N, Benjamin RS (1995) Treatment of uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver: a review of the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience and prognostic factors. Cancer 76:1665–1670

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cortazar P and Johnson BE (1999) Review of the efficacy of individualized chemotherapy selected by in vitro drug sensitivity testing for patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:1625–1631

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cree IA (2003) Chemosensitivity testing as an aid to anti-cancer drug and regimen development. Recent Results Cancer Res 161:119–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eskelin S, Pyrhönen S, Hahka-Kemppinen M, Tuomaala S (2003) A prognostic model and staging for metastastic uveal melanoma. Cancer 97:465–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt OS, Krishan A (2003) Apoptosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay distinguishes anticancer drugs from toxic chemicals and predicts drug synergism. Chem Biol Interact 145:89–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaspers GJ, Veerman AJ, Pieters R, Van Zantwijk CH, Smets LA, Van Wering ER, Van Der Does-Van Den Berg A (1997) In vitro cellular drug resistance and prognosis in newly diagnosed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 90:2723–2729

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kath R, Hayungs J, Bornfeld N, Sauerwein W, Höffken K, Seeber S (1993) Prognosis and treatment of disseminated uveal melanoma. Cancer 72:2219–2223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leyvraz S, Spataro V, Bauer J, Pampallona S, Salmon R, Dorval T, Meuli R, Gillet M, Lejeune F, Zografos L (1997) Treatment of ocular melanoma metastatic to the liver by hepatic arterial chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15:2589–2595

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod HL, Murray GI, Mollison J, McKay J, Cassidy J (1999) Selection of markers to predict tumour response or survival: description of a novel approach. Eur J Cancer 35:1650–1652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara M, Clynes M, Dunne B, NicAmhlaoibh R, Lee WR, Barnes C, Kennedy SM (1996) Multidrug resistance in ocular melanoma. Br J Ophthalmol 80:1009–1012

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neale MH, Myatt NE, Khoury GG, et al (2001) Comparison of the ex vivo chemosensitivity of uveal and cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res 11:601–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pföhler C, Cree IA, Ugurel S, Kuwert C, Haass N, Neuber K, Hengge U, Corrie PG, Zutt M, Tilgen W, Reinhold U (2003) Treosulfan and gemcitabine in metastastic uveal melanoma patients: results of a multicenter feasibility study. Anticancer Drugs 14:337–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Kittler O, Ragg T, Daskalakis A, Granzow M, Ahr A, Blankenstein TJ, Kaufmann M, Diebold J, Arnholdt H, Muller P, Bischoff J, Harich D, Schlimok G, Riethmuller G, Eils R, Klein CA (2003) From latent disseminated cells to overt metastasis: genetic analysis of systemic breast cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:7737–7742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shields JA, Shields CL, DePotter O, Singh AD (1996) Diagnosis and treatment of uveal melanoma. Semin Oncol 23:763–767

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Becker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terheyden, P., Bröcker, EB. & Becker, J.C. Clinical evaluation of in vitro chemosensitivity testing: the example of uveal melanoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 130, 395–399 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-004-0569-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-004-0569-4

Keywords

Navigation