Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A long-term follow-up in conservative management of unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poor drainage and good renal function

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to retrospectively review the outcome of neonatal ureteropelvic junction obstruction with a good renal function and a poor drainage at a first diuretic renal scan, in cases where surgery was recommended on the basis of a loss of renal function, worsening of hydronephrosis or occurrence of clinical symptoms. Hydronephrosis was graded from 1 to 4 or as ureteral tract dilatation (UTD) P1 to UTD P3. During follow-up, 15 out of 38 patients (34.2%) required surgery while 25 out of 38 (65.8%) could have been managed conservatively. In patients with grade 2, 3, and 4 hydronephrosis, the ureteropelvic junction obstruction resolved or improved spontaneously in 100%, 63%, and 33% of cases (in 100% of UTD P1, 67% of UTD P2, and 50% of UTD P3), respectively. The median of follow-up was 14 years. Chi-square test showed a significant relationship between initial grade of hydronephrosis or UTD and the possibility of an efficient conservative management (p = 0.0088 and p = 0.0460).

Conclusion: Conservative management can be safely achieved in ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poor drainage. Scheduled controls are needed for early discovery of functional renal deterioration. High-grade hydronephrosis is unlikely to resolve spontaneously and is often accompanied by a loss of renal function during the first years of life.

What is Known:

There is controversy about which management should be adopted in infants with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poor drainage but good differential renal function.

What is New:

Long-term follow-up suggests that conservative management can be safely achieved also in unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poor drainage in more than 60% of cases, even if high-grade hydronephrosis is unlikely to resolve spontaneously and it is often accompanied by a loss of renal function during the first years of life. In our experience, surgical intervention was required in more than 50% of cases before 1 year of life and in all cases before 3 years of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

99mTc-DTPA:

99m-technetium-diethylentriaminopentaacetic acid

APD:

Antero-posterior diameter

DRG:

Diuretic renal scan

References

  1. Abadir N, Schmidt M, Laube GF, Weitz M (2017) Imaging in children with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction: time to reduce investigations? Eur J Pediatr 176:1173–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arora S, Yadav P, Kumar M, Singh SK, Sureka SK, Mittal V, Ansari MS (2015) Predictors for the need of surgery in antenatally detected hydronephrosis due to UPJ obstruction--a prospective multivariate analysis. J Pediatr Urol 11:248.e1–248.e5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blyth B, Snyder HM, Duckett JW (1993) Antenatal diagnosis and subsequent management of hydronephrosis. J Urol 149:693–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caiulo VA, Caiulo S, Gargasole C, Chiriacò G, Latini G, Cataldi L, Mele G (2012) Ultrasound mass screening for congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Pediatr Nephrol 27:949–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chertin B, Fridmans A, Knizhnik M, Hadas-Halperin I, Hain D, Farkas A (1999) Does early detection of ureteropelvic junction obstruction improve surgical outcome in terms of renal function? J Urol 162:1037–1040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chertin B, Pollack A, Koulikov D, Rabinowitz R, Hain D, Hadas-Halpren I, Farkas A (2006) Conservative treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children with antenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis: lessons learned after 16 years of follow-up. Eur Urol 49:734–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cutroneo G, Arena S, Anastasi G, Cervellione RM, Grimaldi S, Di Mauro D, Speciale F, Arena F, Di Benedetto V, Favaloro A, Magno C (2011) Altered cytoskeletal structure of smooth muscle cells in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 185:2314–2319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhillon HK (1998) Prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: the Great Ormond Street experience. Br J Urol 81:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ (1993) Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 23:478–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. González R, Schimke CM (2001) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children. Pediatr Clin N Am 48:1505–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon I, Piepsz A, Sixt R, Auspices of Paediatric Committee of European Association of Nuclear Medicine (2011) Guidelines for standard and diuretic renogram in children. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:1175–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon ZN, McLeod DJ, Ching CB, Herz DB, Bates DG, Becknell B, Alpert SA (2016) Uroepithelial thickening improves detection of vesicoureteral reflux in infantswith prenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 12:257.e1–257.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harper L, Bourquard D, Grosos C, Abbo O, Ferdynus C, Michel JL, Dunand O, Sauvat F (2013) Cortical transit time as a predictive marker of the need for surgery in children with pelvi-ureteric junction stenosis: preliminary study. J Pediatr Urol 9:1054–1058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. King LR, Coughlin PW, Bloch EC, Bowie JD, Ansong K, Hanna MK (1984) The case for immediate pyeloplasty in the neonate with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 132:725–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Koff SA (1998) Neonatal management of unilateral hydronephrosis. Role for delayed intervention. Urol Clin North Am 25:181–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Koff SA (2000) Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis using an observational approach. Urology 55:609–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koff SA, Campbell K (1992) Nonoperative management of unilateral neonatal hydronephrosis. J Urol 148:525–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee JN, Kang JK, Jeong SY, Lee SM, Cho MH, Ha YS, Kim HT, Kim TH, Yoo ES, Kwon TG, Chung SK (2018) Predictive value of cortical transit time on MAG3 for surgery in antenatally detected unilateral hydronephrosis caused by ureteropelvic junction stenosis. J Pediatr Urol 14:55.e1–55.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Z, Zhao Z, Liu X, Su Z, Shang X, Wen J (2012) Prediction of the outcome of antenatal hydronephrosis: significance of urinary EGF. Pediatr Nephrol 27:2251–2259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu DB, Armstrong WR 3rd, Maizels M (2014) Hydronephrosis: prenatal and postnatal evaluation and management. Clin Perinatol 41:661–678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Longpre M, Nguan A, Macneily AE, Afshar K (2012) Prediction of the outcome of antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: a multivariable analysis. J Pediatr Urol 8:135–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B, Campbell JB, Chow J, Coleman B, Cooper C, Crino J, Darge K, Herndon CD, Odibo AO, Somers MJ, Stein DR (2014) Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol 10:982–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Onen A (2007) Treatment and outcome of prenatally detected newborn hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 3:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Onen A, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA (2002) Long-term followup of prenatally detected severe bilateral newborn hydronephrosis initially managed nonoperatively. J Urol 168:1118–1120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozcan Z, Anderson PJ, Gordon I (2004) Prenatally diagnosed unilateral renal pelvic dilatation: a dynamic condition on ultrasound and diuretic renography. J Urol 172:1456–1459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Palmer LS, Maizels M, Cartwright PC, Fernbach SK, Conway JJ (1998) Surgery versus observation for managing obstructive grade 3 to 4 unilateral hydronephrosis: a report from the Society for Fetal Urology. J Urol 159:222–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Peters CA (1995) Urinary tract obstruction in children. J Urol 154:1874–1883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Piepsz A, Tondeur M, Nogarède C, Collier F, Ismaili K, Hall M, Dobbeleir A, Ham H (2011) Can severely impaired cortical transit predict which children with pelvi-ureteric junction stenosis detected antenatally might benefit from pyeloplasty? Nucl Med Commun 32:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schlotmann A, Clorius JH, Clorius SN (2009) Diuretic renography in hydronephrosis: renal tissue tracer transit predicts functional course and thereby need for surgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:1665–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sedman AB, Bahl V, Bunting E, Bandy K, Jones S, Nasr SZ, Schulz K, Campbell DA (2004) Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups. Pediatrics 114:965–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Suda K, Koga H, Okawada M, Doi T, Miyano G, Lane GJ, Yamataka A (2015) The effect of preoperative urinary tract infection on postoperative renal function in prenatally diagnosed ureteropelvic junction obstruction: indications for the timing of pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Surg 50:2068–2070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Takla NV, Hamilton BD, Cartwright PC, Snow BW (1998) Apparent unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the newborn: expectations for resolution. J Urol 160:2175–2178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ulman I, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA (2000) The long-term followup of newborns with severe unilateral hydronephrosis initially treated nonoperatively. J Urol 164:1101–1105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Vemulakonda VM, Wilcox DT, Crombleholme TM, Bronsert M, Kempe A (2015) Factors associated with age at pyeloplasty in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Pediatr Surg Int 31:871–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Arena Salvatore: conceived and designed, drafted and approved the final version; Chimenz Roberto: critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted; Antonelli Enrica: collected data, drafted the paper; Peri Flora Maria: carried out the analyses of the collected data and approved the final version of the paper; Romeo Paola: drafted the revised manuscript and approved the final version; Impellizzeri Pietro: provided constructive comments to the manuscript; Romeo Carmelo: critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Arena.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Communicated by Mario Bianchetti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arena, S., Chimenz, R., Antonelli, E. et al. A long-term follow-up in conservative management of unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poor drainage and good renal function. Eur J Pediatr 177, 1761–1765 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3239-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3239-2

Keywords

Navigation