Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Personalized histopathology reporting for personalized medicine: a plea for improved communication

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable

References

  1. Varma M, Delahunt B, van der Kwast T (2019) Grading noninvasive bladder cancer: World Health Organisation 1973 or 2004 may be the wrong question. Eur Urol 76:413–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VE, Humphrey PA (2017) Contemporary Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: an update with discussion on practical issues to implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 41:e1–e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, Marth C, Nout R, Querleu D, Mirza MR, Sessa C, ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Endometrial Consensus Conference Working Group (2015) ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Radiother Oncol 117:559–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amin W, Sirintrapun SJ, Parwani AV (2010) Utility and applications of synoptic reporting in pathology. Open Access Bioinformatics 2:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Srigley JR, McGowan T, Maclean A et al (2009) Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach. J Surg Oncol 99:517–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, Grading Committee (2016) The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol 40:244–252

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, Rosai J (2017) WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs, 4th edn. IARC Press, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE (2016) WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs, 4th edn. IARC Press, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iczkowski KA, MacLennan GT, Bostwick DG (1997) Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsies: clinical significance in 33 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 21:1489–1495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Professor Daniel Berney’s work is supported by the cancer charity, Orchid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The paper was conceived by Murali Varma who wrote the first draft. All authors reviewed the draft and contributed equally to the final version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murali Varma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have approved the final version of the paper for publication.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Varma, M., Delahunt, B., McCluggage, W.G. et al. Personalized histopathology reporting for personalized medicine: a plea for improved communication. Virchows Arch 477, 323–325 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02836-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02836-2

Navigation