Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

HER2 testing in gastric cancer diagnosis: insights on variables influencing HER2-positivity from a large, multicenter, observational study in Germany

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

HER2 testing in metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/mGEJC) is standard practice. Variations in HER2-positivity rates suggest factors affecting test quality; however, the influence of patient-, tumor-, and laboratory-related factors on HER2-positivity rates remains unknown. This observational, prospective study collected routine HER2 testing data from 50 pathology centers in Germany (January 2013–December 2015). For each sample, HER2 status, primary tumor location, method of sample retrieval, and other patient- and tumor-related parameters were recorded. A model for predicting the probability of HER2-positivity was developed using stepwise multiple logistic regression to identify influencing factors. Documented positivity rates and corresponding predicted HER2-positivity probabilities were compared to identify institutes with deviations in HER2-positivity. Data from 2761 mGC/mGEJC routine diagnostic specimens included 2033 with HER2 test results (1554 mGC, 479 mGEJC); overall HER2-positivity rates across centers were 19.8% and 30.5%, respectively. HER2-positivity correlated most with Lauren classification, then HER2 testing rate, primary tumor location, sample type, and testing method (all p < 0.05). Three institutes had model-predicted HER2-positivity rates outside the 95% confidence interval of their documented rate, which could not be explained by sample and center characteristics. Results demonstrated the high quality of routine HER2 testing in the mGC/mGEJC cohort analyzed. This is the first study investigating parameters impacting on HER2-positivity rates in mGC/mGEJC in routine practice and suggests that assessment of HER2 testing quality should consider primary tumor location, testing method and rate, and tumor characteristics. Accurate identification of patients with HER2-positive mGC/mGEJC is essential for appropriate use of HER2-targeted therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boku N (2014) HER2-positive gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 17:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0252-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A et al (2010) Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376:687–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Cutsem E, Bang Y, Feng-yi F et al (2015) HER2 screening data from ToGA: targeting HER2 in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Gastric Cancer 18:476–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0402-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartley AN, Washington MK, Colasacco C, Ventura CB, Ismaila N, Benson AB III, Carrato A, Gulley ML, Jain D, Kakar S, Mackay HJ, Streutker C, Tang L, Troxell M, Ajani JA (2017) HER2 testing and clinical decision making in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 35:446–464. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, Gutheil JC, Harris LN, Fehrenbacher L, Slamon DJ, Murphy M, Novotny WF, Burchmore M, Shak S, Stewart SJ, Press M (2002) Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:719–726. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344:783–792. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200103153441101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim SB, Im SA, Hegg R, Im YH, Roman L, Pedrini JL, Pienkowski T, Knott A, Clark E, Benyunes MC, Ross G, Swain SM (2012) Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 366:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1113216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Roman L, Tseng LM, Liu MC, Lluch A, Staroslawska E, de la Haba-Rodriguez J, Im SA, Pedrini JL, Poirier B, Morandi P, Semiglazov V, Srimuninnimit V, Bianchi G, Szado T, Ratnayake J, Ross G, Valagussa P (2012) Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70336-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim SB, Ro J, Semiglazov V, Campone M, Ciruelos E, Ferrero JM, Schneeweiss A, Heeson S, Clark E, Ross G, Benyunes MC, Cortés J (2015) Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 372:724–734. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1413513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Marty M, Cognetti F, Maraninchi D, Snyder R, Mauriac L, Tubiana-Hulin M, Chan S, Grimes D, Antón A, Lluch A, Kennedy J, O’Byrne K, Conte PF, Green M, Ward C, Mayne K, Extra JM (2005) Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: the M77001 study group. J Clin Oncol 23:4265–4274. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.04.173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D, ESMO Guidelines Committee (2016) Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:v38–v49. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choritz H, Büsche G, Kreipe H, Study Group HER2 Monitor (2011) Quality assessment of HER2 testing by monitoring of positivity rates. Virchows Arch 459:283–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-011-1132-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rüschoff J, Hanna W, Bilous M, Hofmann M, Osamura RY, Penault-Llorca F, van de Vijver M, Viale G (2012) HER2 testing in gastric cancer: a practical approach. Mod Pathol 25:637–650. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2011.198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cunningham D, Shah MA, Smith D et al (2015) False-negative rate for HER2 testing in 738 gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers (GEC) from two global randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 33(Suppl):Abstract 16. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baretton G, Dietel M, Gaiser T, Kirchner T, Kreipe HH, Quaas A, Röcken C, Rüschoff J, Tannapfel A, Lordick F, al-Batran S, Hofheinz R, Lorenzen S, Moehler M, Thuss-Patience P (2016) HER2 testing in gastric cancer: results of a meeting of German experts [article in German]. Pathologe 37:361–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-016-0179-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rüschoff J, Nagelmeier I, Baretton G, Dietel M, Höfler H, Schildhaus HU, Büttner R, Schlake W, Stoss O, Kreipe HH (2010) Her2 testing in gastric cancer. What is different in comparison to breast cancer? [article in German]. Pathologe 31:208–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-010-1278-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rüschoff J, Dietel M, Baretton G, Arbogast S, Walch A, Monges G, Chenard MP, Penault-Llorca F, Nagelmeier I, Schlake W, Höfler H, Kreipe HH (2010) HER2 diagnostics in gastric cancer-guideline validation and development of standardized immunohistochemical testing. Virchows Arch 457:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-010-0952-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hofmann M, Stoss O, Shi D, Büttner R, van de Vijver M, Kim W, Ochiai A, Rüschoff J, Henkel T (2008) Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validation study. Histopathology 52:797–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03028.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bianchi S, Caini S, Paglierani M et al (2015) Accuracy and reproducibility of HER2 status in breast cancer using immunohistochemistry: a quality control study in Tuscany evaluating the impact of updated 2013 ASCO/CAP recommendations. Pathol Oncol Res 21:477–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-014-9852-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Perez EA, Suman VJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Kaufman PA, Lingle WL, Flynn PJ, Ingle JN, Visscher D, Jenkins RB (2006) HER2 testing by local, central, and reference laboratories in specimens from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 intergroup adjuvant trial. J Clin Oncol 24:3032–3038. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.03.4744

  21. Roche PC, Suman VJ, Jenkins RB, Davidson NE, Martino S, Kaufman PA, Addo FK, Murphy B, Ingle JN, Perez EA (2002) Concordance between local and central laboratory HER2 testing in the breast intergroup trial N9831. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:855–857. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.11.855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rüschoff J, Lebeau A, Kreipe H et al (2017) Assessing HER2 testing quality in breast cancer: variables that influence HER2 positivity rate from a large, multicenter, observational study in Germany. Mod Pathol 30:217–226. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2016.164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG et al (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31:3997–4013. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tominaga N, Gotoda T, Hara M, Hale MD, Tsuchiya T, Matsubayashi J, Kono S, Kusano C, Itoi T, Fujimoto K, Moriyasu F, Grabsch HI (2016) Five biopsy specimens from the proximal part of the tumor reliably determine HER2 protein expression status in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 19:553–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0502-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Buas MF, Vaughan TL (2013) Epidemiology and risk factors for gastroesophageal junction tumors: understanding the rising incidence of this disease. Semin Radiat Oncol 23:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2012.09.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim YS, Kim N, Kim GH (2016) Sex and gender differences in gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 22:575–588. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm16138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the patients, their families, the nurses, and the investigators who participated in this study. We would like to thank the centers of the Nicht-interventionelle Untersuchung (NIU) HER2 Study Group who provided information on samples, along with clinical and diagnostic data for the analyses (listed in Online Resource 1). In addition, we would like to thank Johannes Ammann for operative and scientific support. Support for third-party writing assistance for this manuscript, furnished by Helen Keyworth, PhD, of Health Interactions, was provided by Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.

Funding

This study was funded by Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

RH, SM, and JR contributed to the conception and study design. HHK, TG, RH, KB, and JR contributed to the collection and assembly of data. GB, PS, TG, RH, WK, CK, and JR contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. WK performed the statistical analysis. All the authors contributed to the drafting of the article, provided critical revision for important intellectual content, and approved the final version. CK provided administrative, technical, or logistic support for this article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo Baretton.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the local ethical committee of the principal investigator and were available for submission to the local ethical committees of the participating centers.

Conflict of interest

GB and PS have received reimbursement and honoraria for attending symposia and advisory boards, and supplies for research from Roche Pharma AG. HK has received honoraria and reimbursement from, and acted in an advisory and/or consulting role for, Roche Pharma, Genomic Health, and AstraZeneca. TG has received honoraria for lectures and/or consultant activities from Roche. RH has received honoraria and research funding from, and acted in an advisory role for, Roche. WK is employed by BDS Koch, which receives payment from Roche for statistical services. CK is an employee of Roche Pharma AG, Germany. SM is an employee of Roche. JR has acted in an advisory and/or consulting role for Roche, MSD, and BMS, and received research funding from Roche. KB has declared no conflicts of interest.

Data sharing statement

Qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level data through the clinical study data request platform (www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com). Further details on Roche’s criteria for eligible studies are available here: https://clinicalstudydatarequest.com/Study-Sponsors/Study-Sponsors-Roche.aspx. For further detail on Roche’s Global Policy on the Sharing of Clinical Information and how to request access to related clinical study documents, see here: https://www.roche.com/research_and_development/who_we_are_how_we_work/clinical_trials/our_commitment_to_data_sharing.htm.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The investigators in the NIU HER2 study group are listed in Online Resource 1.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 39 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 93 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 36 kb)

ESM 4

(XLSX 17 kb)

ESM 5

(DOCX 35 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baretton, G., Kreipe, H.H., Schirmacher, P. et al. HER2 testing in gastric cancer diagnosis: insights on variables influencing HER2-positivity from a large, multicenter, observational study in Germany. Virchows Arch 474, 551–560 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-019-02541-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-019-02541-9

Keywords

Navigation