Abstract
The arthropod head is a complex metameric structure. In insects, orthodenticle (otd) functions as a ‘head gap gene’ and plays a significant role in patterning and development of the anterior head ectoderm, the protocerebrum, and the ventral midline. In this study, we characterize the structure and developmental deployment of two otd paralogs in the amphipod crustacean, Parhyale hawaiensis. Photd1 is initially expressed at gastrulation through germband stages in a bilaterally symmetric, restricted region of the anterior head ectoderm and also in a single column of cells along the ventral midline. Late in embryogenesis, Photd1 is expressed within the developing anterior brain and the expression along the embryonic midline has become restricted to a stereotypic group of segmentally reiterated cells. The second ortholog Photd2, however, has a unique temporal–spatial expression pattern and is not detected until after the head lobes have been organized in the developing ectoderm of the germband during late germband stages. Anteriorly, Photd2 is coincident with the Photd1 head expression domain; however, Photd2 is not detected along the ventral midline during formation of the germband and only appears in the ventral midline late in embryonic development in a restricted group of cells distinct from those expressing Photd1. The early expression of Photd1 in the anterior head ectoderm is consistent with a role as a head gap gene. The more posterior expression of Photd1 is suggestive of a role in patterning the embryonic ventral midline. Photd2 expression appears too late to play a role in early head patterning but may contribute to latter patterning in restricted regions of both the head and the ventral midline. The comparative analysis of otd reveals the divergence of gene expression and gene function associated with duplication of this important developmental gene.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acampora D, Avantaggiato V, Tuorto F, Barone P, Reichert H, Finkelstein R, Simeone A (1998) Murine Otx1 and Drosophila otd genes share conserved genetic functions required in invertebrate and vertebrate brain development. Development 125:1691–1702
Adoutte A, Balavoine G, Lartillot N, Lespinet O, Prud’homme B, de Rosa R (2000) The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4453–4456
Arendt D, Nubler-Jung K (1996) Common ground plans in early brain development in mice and flies. Bioessays 18:255–259
Arendt D, Technau U, Wittbrodt J (2001) Evolution of the bilaterian larval foregut. Nature 409:81–85
Bossing T, Technau GM (1994) The fate of the CNS midline progenitors in Drosophila as revealed by a new method for single cell labelling. Development 120:1895–1906
Browne WE, Price AL, Gerberding M, Patel NH (2005) Stages of embryonic development in the amphipod crustacean, Parhyale hawaiensis. Genesis 42:124–149
Bruce AEE, Shankland M (1998) Expression of the head gene Lox22-Otx in the leech Helobdella and the origin of the bilaterian body plan. Dev Biol 201:101–112
Cohen S, Jürgens G (1990) Mediation of Drosophila head development by gap-like segmentation genes. Nature 346:482–485
Cohen S, Jürgens G (1991) Drosophila headlines. Trends Genet 7:267–272
Condron BG, Zinn K (1994) The Grasshopper median neuroblast is a multipotent progenitor cell that generates glia and neurons in distinct temporal phases. J Neurosci 14:5766–5777
Cook CE, Yue Q, Akam M (2005) Mitochondrial genomes suggest that hexapods and crustaceans are mutually paraphyletic. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1295–1304
Dalton D, Chadwick R, McGinnis W (1989) Expression and embryonic function of empty spiracles: a Drosophila homeo box gene with two patterning functions on the anterior–posterior axis of the embryo. Genes Dev 3:1940–1956
Dohle W (2001) Are the insects terrestrial crustaceans? A discussion of some new facts and arguments and the proposal of the proper name ‘Tetraconata’ for the monophyletic unit Crustacea plus Hexapoda. Ann Soc Entomol Fr 37:85–103
Duman-Scheel M, Patel NH (1999) Analysis of molecular marker expression reveals neuronal homology in distantly related arthropods. Development 126:2327–2334
Eriksson BJ, Budd GE (2000) Onychophoran cephalic nerves and their bearing on our understanding of head segmentation and stem-group evolution of Arthropoda. Arthropod Struct Dev 29:197–209
Finkelstein R, Perrimon N (1990) The orthodenticle gene is regulated by bicoid and torso and specifies Drosophila head development. Nature 346:485–488
Finkelstein R, Smouse D, Capaci TM, Spradling AC, Perrimon N (1990) The orthodenticle gene encodes a novel homeo domain protein involved in the development of the Drosophila nervous system and ocellar visual structures. Genes Dev 4:1516–1527
Finnerty JR, Paulson D, Burton P, Pang K, Martindale MQ (2003) Early evolution of a homeobox gene: the parahox gene Gsx in the Cnidaria and the Bilateria. Evolut Develop 5:331–345
Friedrich M, Tautz D (1995) Ribosomal DNA phlogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 376:165–167
Gallitano-Mendel A, Finkelstein R (1998) Ectopic orthodenticle expression alters segment polarity gene expression but not head segment identity in the Drosophila embryo. Dev Biol 199:125–137
Gerberding M (1997) Germ band formation and early neurogenesis of Leptodora kindti (Cladocera): first evidence for neuroblasts in the entomostracan crustaceans. Invertebr Reprod Dev 32:63–73
Gerberding M, Scholtz G (1999) Cell lineage of the midline cells in the amphipod crustacean Orchestia cavimana (Crustacea, Malacostraca) during formation and separation of the germ band. Dev Genes Evol 209:91–102
Gerberding M, Scholtz G (2001) Neurons and glia in the midline of the higher crustacean Orchestia cavimana are generated via an invariant cell lineage that comprises a median neuroblast and glial progenitors. Dev Biol 235:397–409
Gerberding M, Browne WE, Patel NH (2002) Cell lineage analysis of the amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis reveals an early restriction of cell fates. Development 129:5789–5801
Germot A, Lecointre G, Plouhinec J-L, Le Mentec C, Girardot F, Mazan S (2001) Structural evolution of Otx Genes in Craniates. Mol Biol Evol 18:1668–1678
Giribet G, Edgecombe GD, Wheeler WC (2001) Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413:157–161
Giribet G, Richter S, Edgecombe GD, Wheeler WC (2005) The position of crustaceans within Arthropoda—evidence from nine molecular loci and morphology. In: Koenemann S, Jenner RA (eds) Crustacea and arthropod relationships. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 307–352
Grossniklaus U, Cadigan KM, Gehring WJ (1994) Three maternal coordinate systems cooperate in the patterning of the Drosophila head. Development 120:3155–3171
Hanstrom B (1928) Vergleichende Anatomie Des Nervensystems Der Wirbellosen Tiere Unter Berucksichtigung Seiner Funktion. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Harada Y, Okai N, Taguchi S, Tagawa K, Humphreys T, Satoh N (2000) Developmental expression of the hemichordate otx ortholog. Mech Dev 91:337–339
Harzsch S (2003) Ontogeny of the ventral nerve cord in malacostracan crustaceans: a common plan for neuronal development in Crustacea, Hexapoda and other Arthropoda? Arthropod Struct Dev 32:17–37
Hirth F, Therianos S, Loop T, Gehring WJ, Reichert H, Furukubo-Tokunaga K (1995) Developmental defects in brain segmentation caused by mutations of the homeobox genes orthodenticle and empty spiracles in Drosophila. Neuron 15:769–778
Hirth F, Kammermeier L, Frei E, Walldorf U, Noll M, Reichert H (2003) An urbilaterian origin of the tripartite brain: developmental genetic insights from Drosophila. Development 130:2365–2373
Hwang UW, Friedrich M, Tautz D, Park CJ, Kim W (2001) Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates. Nature 413:154–157
Klämbt C, Jacobs JR, Goodman CS (1991) The midline of the Drosophila central nervous system: a model for the genetic analysis of cell fate, cell migration, and growth cone guidance. Cell 64:801–815
Li Y, Brown SJ, Hausdorf B, Tautz D, Denell RE, Finkelstein R (1996) Two orthodenticle-related genes in the short-germ beetle Tribolium castaneum. Dev Genes Evol 206:35–45
Lichtneckert R, Reichert H (2005) Insights into the urbilaterian brain: conserved genetic patterning mechanisms in insect and vertebrate brain development. Heredity 94:465–477
Lowe CJ, Wu M, Salic A, Evans L, Lander E, Stange-Thomann N, Gruber CE, Gerhart J, Kirschner M (2003) Anteroposterior patterning in hemichordates and the origins of the chordate nervous system. Cell 113:853–865
Maxmen A, Browne WE, Martindale MQ, Giribet G (2005) Neuroanatomy of sea spiders implies an appendicular origin of the protocerebral segment. Nature 437:1144–1148
Myers PZ, Bastiani MJ (1993) Cell–cell interactions during the migration of an identified commissural growth cone in the embryonic grasshopper. J Neurosci 13:115–126
Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford, Oxford
Page RDM (1996) TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12:357–358
Patel N (1994) Imaging neuronal subsets and other cell types in whole mount Drosophila embryos and larvae using antibody probes. Methods Cell Biol 44:445–487
Pavlopoulos A, Averof M (2005) Establishing genetic transformation for comparative developmental studies in the crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7888–7893
Philippe H, Sorhannus U, Baroin A, Perasso R, Gasse F, Adoutte A (1994) Comparison of molecular and paleontological data in diatoms suggest a major gap in the fossil record. J Evol Biol 7:247–265
Philippe H, Forterre P (1999) The rooting of the universal tree of life is not reliable. J Mol Evol 49:509–523
Posada D, Crandall K (1998) ModelTest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818
Radding (1982) Homologous pairing and strand exchange in genetic recombination. Annu Rev Genet 16:405–437
Regier JC, Shultz JW, Kambic RE (2005) Pancrustacean phylogeny: hexapods are terrestrial crustaceans and maxillopods are not monophyletic. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:395–401
Reichert H, Boyan G (1997) Building a brain: developmental insights in insects. Trends Neurosci 20:258–264
Rempel JG (1975) The evolution of the insect head: the endless dispute. Quaest Entomol 11:7–25
Richter S (2002) The Tetraconata concept: hexapod–crustacean relationships and the phylogeny of Crustacea. Org Divers Evol 2:217–237
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574
Royet J, Finkelstein R (1995) Pattern formation in Drosophila head development: the role of the orthodenticle homeobox gene. Development 121:3561–3572
Sandeman D, Sandeman R, Derby C, Schmidt M (1992) Morphology of the brain of crayfish, crabs, and spiny lobsters: a common nomenclature for homologous structures. Biol Bull 183:304–326
Schmid A, Chiba A, Doe CQ (1999) Clonal analysis of Drosophila embryonic neuroblasts: neural cell types, axon projections and muscle targets. Development 126:4653–4689
Schmidt-Ott U, Gonzalez-Gaitan M, Jäckle H, Technau GM (1994) Number, identity, and sequence of the Drosophila head segments as revealed by neural elements and their deletion patterns in mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:8363–8367
Scholtz G, Edgecombe GD (2005) Heads, Hox, and the phylogenetic position of trilobites. In: Koenemann S, Jenner RA (eds) Crustacea and arthropod relationships. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 139–165
Schröder R (2003) The genes orthodenticle and hunchback substitute for bicoid in the beetle Tribolium. Nature 422:621–625
Sharman AC, Brand M (1998) Evolution and homology of the nervous system: cross-phylum rescues of otd/Otx genes. Trends Genet 14:211–214
Strausfeld NJ (1998) Crustacean–insect relationships: the use of brain characters to derive phylogeny amongst segmented invertebrates. Brain Behav Evol 52:186–206
Strausfeld NJ, Hildebrand JG (1999) Olfactory systems: common design, uncommon origins? Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:634–639
Swofford D (2003) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4: 4.0Beta edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts
Telford MJ, Thomas RH (1998) Expression of homeobox genes shows chelicerate arthorpods retain their deutocerebral segment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:10671–10675
Urbach R, Technau GM (2003a) Molecular markers for identified neuroblasts in the developing brain of Drosophila. Development 130:3621–3637
Urbach R, Technau GM (2003b) Early steps in building the insect brain: neuroblast formation and segmental patterning in the developing brain of different insect species. Arthropod Struct Dev 32:103–123
Walldorf U, Gehring WJ (1992) Empty spiracles, a gap gene containing a homeobox involved in Drosophila head development. EMBO J 11:2247–2259
Whitington PM (1996) Evolution of neural development in the arthropods. Sem Cell Dev Biol 7:605–614
Whitington PM, Leach D, Sanderman R (1993) Evolutionary change in neural development within the arthropods: axonogenesis in the embryos of two crustaceans. Development 118:449–461
Wieschaus E, Perrimon N, Finkelstein R (1992) Orthodenticle activity is required for the development of medial structures in the larval and adult epidermis of Drosophila. Development 115:801–811
Wimmer EA, Jäckle H, Pfeifle C, Cohen SM (1993) A Drosophila homologue of human Sp1 is a head-specific segmentation gene. Nature 366:690–694
Wimmer EA, Cohen SM, Jäckle H, Desplan C (1997) buttonhead does not contribute to a combinatorial code proposed for Drosophila head development. Development 124:1509–1517
Younossi-Hartenstein A, Green P, Liaw G-J, Rudolph K, Lengyel J, Hartenstein V (1997) Control of early neurogenesis of the Drosophila brain by the head gap genes tll, otd, ems, and btd. Dev Biol 182:270–283
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the NSF (WEB, DBI-0310269), the NIH (WEB, NCRR-P20RR16467), the Boehringer Ingelheim Foundation (EAW), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EAW, DFG Wi 1797/2-2), the European Community’s Marie Curie Research Training Network ZOONET under contract MRTN-CT-2004-005624 (EAW). EAW also acknowledges support from the EMBO Young Investigator Programme. We thank Kevin Pang and Andreas Hejnol for Otx sequences, Frank Poulin and Nipam H. Patel for D. pulex otd information, and Casey Dunn for computation advice. We also thank the following for providing critical comments that have significantly improved this communication: Elaine Seaver, Amy Maxmen, Andreas Hejnol, Casey Dunn, Nipam H. Patel, and two anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by S. Roth
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Browne, W.E., Schmid, B.G.M., Wimmer, E.A. et al. Expression of otd orthologs in the amphipod crustacean, Parhyale hawaiensis . Dev Genes Evol 216, 581–595 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-006-0074-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-006-0074-7