Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical management of parastomal hernia following radical cystectomy and ileal conduit: A french multi-institutional experience

  • Research
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Parastomal incisional hernia (PH) is a frequent complication following the creation of an ileal conduit (IC), and it can be a significant detriment to quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of PH repair following IC for urinary diversion.

Method

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted of 6 academic hospitals in France. The study’s population included patients who underwent surgical treatment for parastomal hernia following IC creation from 2013 to 2021.

Results

Fifty-one patients were included in the study. Median follow up was 15.3 months. Eighteen patients presented with a recurrence (35%), with a median time to recurrence of 11.1 months. The vast majority of PH repair was performed through an open approach (88%). With regard to technique, Keyhole was the most reported technique (46%) followed by Sugarbaker (22%) and suture only (20%). The Keyhole technique was associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared to the Sugarbaker technique (52% vs 10%, p = 0.046). Overall, there was a 7.8% rate of major complications without a statistical difference between PH repair techniques for major complications.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia following IC was associated with a high risk of recurrence. Novel surgical approaches to PH repair should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are availlable on request.

References

  1. Bricker EM (1956) Substitution for the urinary bladder by the use of isolated ileal segments. Surg Clin North Am août 36:1117–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization (WHO), Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Hafez K, Haro I, Mansson W et al (2007) Urinary diversion. Urology 69(1 Suppl):17–49

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shimko MS, Tollefson MK, Umbreit EC, Farmer SA, Blute ML, Frank I (2011) Long-term complications of conduit urinary diversion. J Urol févr 185(2):562–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Farnham SB, Cookson MS (2004) Surgical complications of urinary diversion. World J Urol sept 22(3):157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maruo K, Tanaka T, Shindo T, Hashimoto K, Kobayashi K, Fukuta F et al (2020) Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia after ileal conduit diversion in Japanese population. Int J Clin Oncol 25(10):1830–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harraz AM, Elkarta A, Zahran MH, Elsawy AA, Elbaset MA, Elsorougy A et al (2020) Parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary diversion: re-visiting the predictors radiologically and according to patient-reported outcome measures. Scand J Urol déc 54(6):501–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghoreifi A, Allgood E, Whang G, Douglawi A, Yu W, Cai J, et al. (2021) Risk factors and natural history of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit. BJU Int

  8. Donahue TF, Bochner BH, Sfakianos JP, Kent M, Bernstein M, Hilton WM et al (2014) Risk factors for the development of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy. J Urol juin 191(6):1708–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansson BME, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, Groenewoud HMM, Buyne OR, de Hingh IHJT et al (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg avr 255(4):685–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu D, Lang H, Romain B (2021) Parastomal hernia repair using Pauli’s technique (with video). J Visc Surg août 158(4):358–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Manfredelli S, Paiano L, Romain B (2022) Modified Stapled Mesh Stoma Reinforcement Technique (SMART) for parastomal hernias, with video. J Visc Surg févr 159(1):77–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Patroni A, Moszkowicz D, Bouillot J-L (2020) Technique for treatment of parastomal hernia with sublay mesh repair and transprosthetic stomal relocation. J Visc Surg déc 157(6):505–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, Berger D, Berrevoet F, Brandsma H-T et al (2018) European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia févr 22(1):183–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. DeAsis FJ, Lapin B, Gitelis ME, Ujiki MB (2015) Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 21(28):8670–7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hotouras A, Murphy J, Thaha M, Chan CL (2013) The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments. Colorectal Dis mai 15(5):e202-214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB (1994) Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 129(4):413–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shah NR, Craft RO, Harold KL (2013) Parastomal hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 93(5):1185–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg août 250(2):187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Narang SK, Alam NN, Campain NJ, Pathak S, McGrath JS, Daniels IR et al (2017) Parastomal hernia following cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review. Hernia avr 21(2):163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, Ijzermans JN et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Donahue TF, Bochner BH (2016) Parastomal hernias after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. Investig Clin Urol juill 57(4):240–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck E, Vironen J, Vaarala M, Nordström P, Välikoski A, Kössi J et al (2021) Keyhole versus Sugarbaker techniques in parastomal hernia repair following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a retrospective nationwide cohort study. BMC Surg 21(1):231

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gameza VA, Bell Lybecker M, Wara P (2020) Laparoscopic Keyhole Versus Sugarbaker Repair in Parastomal Hernia: A Long-Term Case-Controlled Prospective Study of Consecutive Patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 30(7):783–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pauli EM, Juza RM, Winder JS (2016) How I do it: novel parastomal herniorrhaphy utilizing transversus abdominis release. Hernia août 20(4):547–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Williams NS, Nair R, Bhan C (2011) Stapled mesh stoma reinforcement technique (SMART)–a procedure to prevent parastomal herniation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl mars 93(2):169

    Google Scholar 

  26. Williams NS, Hotouras A, Bhan C, Murphy J, Chan CL (2015) A case-controlled pilot study assessing the safety and efficacy of the Stapled Mesh stomA Reinforcement Technique (SMART) in reducing the incidence of parastomal herniation. Hernia déc 19(6):949–954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Majumder A, Orenstein SB, Miller HJ, Novitsky YW (2018) Stapled Transabdominal Ostomy Reinforcement with retromuscular mesh (STORRM): Technical details and early outcomes of a novel approach for retromuscular repair of parastomal hernias. Am J Surg janv 215(1):82–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. de Smet GHJ, Lambrichts DPV, van den Hoek S, Kroese LF, Buettner S, Menon AG et al (2020) Comparison of different modalities for the diagnosis of parastomal hernia: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis févr 35(2):199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harraz AM, Elkarta A, Zahran MH, Elsawy AA, Elbaset MA, Elsorougy A et al (2020) Parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary diversion: re-visiting the predictors radiologically and according to patient-reported outcome measures. Scand J Urol déc 54(6):501–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kroese LF, Lambrichts DPV, Jeekel J, Kleinrensink GJ, Menon AG, de Graaf EJR et al (2018) Non-operative treatment as a strategy for patients with parastomal hernia: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study. Colorectal Dis juin 20(6):545–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nomura T, Mimata H, Yamasaki M, Sumino Y, Moriyama H, Touhara K et al (2003) Repair of ileal conduit parastomal hernia by translocation of the stoma. Int J Urol déc 10(12):680–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lima MVA, Regadas RP, Tavares JM, Gonzaga Silva LF (2010) Extraperitoneal surgical repair of parastomal hernia of Bricker’s urinary diversion with polypropylene mesh: stoma reimplantation through the mesh. Urol Int 85(1):52–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mitchell CR, Cima RR (2011) A novel technique for the repair of urostomal hernias using human acellular dermal matrix. Urology mars 77(3):746–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liedberg F, Kollberg P, Allerbo M, Baseckas G, Brändstedt J, Gudjonsson S et al (2020) Preventing Parastomal Hernia After Ileal Conduit by the Use of a Prophylactic Mesh: A Randomised Study. Eur Urol 78(5):757–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Member of SFCP-CH: Pr Yann Neuzillet, Dr Alexandra Masson Lecomte et Dr Juliette Cotte, Dr Julien Anract, Pr Evanguelos Xylinas et Dr Antoine Grassin ; Dr Jade Lehrer, Pr Alain Ruffion, Pr Marc Colombel, Dr Jena Francois Gillion

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

NB, GP wrote the manuscript, DM, POD, BR, YR, GP designed the study, DB and BK review and edited the manuscript, NB, PYB, DB, DL, OD collected data, updated the data, cleaned the data bases, and provided statistical analysis, all authors reviewed and edited the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Passot.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

GP, POD, and YR declares consultant honorarium from BD. DM declares consultant honorarium from Gore.

Disclosure

GP, POD, and YR declares consultant honorarium from BD. DM declares consultant honorarium from Gore.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 95 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bel, N., Blanc, PY., Moszkowicz, D. et al. Surgical management of parastomal hernia following radical cystectomy and ileal conduit: A french multi-institutional experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 408, 344 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03062-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03062-5

Keywords

Navigation