Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inflammatory response and recurrence after minimally invasive esophagectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a very invasive surgery that induces an intense systemic inflammatory response. Postoperative infectious complications worsen survival after esophagectomy through inflammatory responses, and this study aimed to investigate the impact of the response on disease recurrence.

Methods

We assessed 230 patients who underwent curative minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The area under the curve of serum C-reactive protein levels from preoperative day through postoperative day 7 was defined as the cumulative magnitude of postoperative inflammatory response.

Results

Relapse-free survival was compared among quartiles of the area, and fourth quartile showed the worst relapse-free survival. Patients in the fourth quartile were the high group, and others were low group. Compared with low group (n = 173), high group (n = 57) showed significantly worse relapse-free survival and overall survival (P = 0.014 and 0.028, respectively). Multivariate analyses found that high group (P = 0.048) was an independent risk factor for recurrence but not overall survival. Higher body mass index (P < 0.001) and postoperative infections (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors to become high group. However, the influence of high group on recurrence was not affected by postoperative infections in interaction analysis (P = 0.889).

Conclusions

Postoperative intense systemic inflammatory response independently increased the risk of recurrence after curative minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Factors associating with intensified inflammatory response are higher body mass index and postoperative infections. Therefore, surgeons should make every effort to prevent postoperative infections to improve the long-term outcomes of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okamura A, Takeuchi H, Matsuda S, Ogura M, Miyasho T, Nakamura R, Takahashi T, Wada N, Kawakubo H, Saikawa Y, Kitagawa Y (2015) Factors affecting cytokine change after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3130–3135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Takeuchi H, Saikawa Y, Oyama T, Ozawa S, Suda K, Wada N, Takahashi T, Nakamura R, Shigematsu N, Ando N, Kitajima M, Kitagawa Y (2010) Factors influencing the long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy. World J Surg 34:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Booka E, Takeuchi H, Nishi T, Matsuda S, Kaburagi T, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Takahashi T, Wada N, Kawakubo H, Omori T, Kitagawa Y (2015) The impact of postoperative complications on survivals after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Medicine 94:e1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Markar S, Gronnier C, Duhamel A, Mabrut JY, Bail JP, Carrere N, Lefevre JH, Brigand C, Vaillant JC, Adham M, Msika S, Demartines N, Nakadi IE, Meunier B, Collet D, Mariette C (2015) The impact of severe anastomotic leak on long-term survival and cancer recurrence after surgical resection for esophageal malignancy. Ann Surg 262:972–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baba Y, Yoshida N, Shigaki H, Iwatsuki M, Miyamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Watanabe M, Baba H (2016) Prognostic impact of postoperative complications in 502 patients with surgically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective single-institution study. Ann Surg 264:305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamashita K, Makino T, Miyata H, Miyazaki Y, Takahashi T, Kurokawa Y, Yamasaki M, Nakajima K, Takiguchi S, Mori M, Doki Y (2016) Postoperative infectious complications are associated with adverse oncologic outcomes in esophageal cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 23:2106–2114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, Igaki H, Ozawa S, Abe T, Nakamura K, Kato K, Ando N, Kitagawa Y (2017) Prognostic impact of postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: exploratory analysis of JCOG9907. Ann Surg 265:1152–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saeki H, Tsutsumi S, Tajiri H, Yukaya T, Tsutsumi R, Nishimura S, Nakaji Y, Kudou K, Akiyama S, Kasagi Y, Nakanishi R, Nakashima Y, Sugiyama M, Ohgaki K, Sonoda H, Oki E, Maehara Y (2017) Prognostic significance of postoperative complications after curative resection for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg 265:527–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayami M, Watanabe M, Ishizuka N, Mine S, Imamura Y, Okamura A, Kurogochi T, Yamashita K (2018) Prognostic impact of postoperative pulmonary complications following salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy. J Surg Oncol 117:1251–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shimada H, Fukagawa T, Haga Y, Oba K (2017) Does postoperative morbidity worsen the oncological outcome after radical surgery for gastrointestinal cancers? A systematic review of the literature. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 1:11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haldar R, Ben-Eliyahu S (2018) Reducing the risk of post-surgical cancer recurrence: a perioperative anti-inflammatory anti-stress approach. Future Oncol 14:1017–1021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Takahashi T, Wada N, Saikawa Y, Kitagawa Y (2015) Correlation between intense postoperative inflammatory response and survival of esophageal cancer patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:4453–4460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (eds) (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumors. International Union Against Cancer, 8th edn. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuwano H, Nishimura Y, Oyama T, Kato H, Kitagawa Y, Kusano M, Shimada H, Takiuchi H, Toh Y, Doki Y, Naomoto Y, Matsubara H, Miyazaki T, Muto M, Yanagisawa A (2015) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus April 2012 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus 12:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, Shinoda M, Ozawa S, Shimizu H, Nakamura T, Yabusaki H, Aoyama N, Kurita A, Ikeda K, Kanda T, Tsujinaka T, Nakamura K, Fukuda H (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Toh Y, Sakaguchi Y, Ikeda O, Adachi E, Ohgaki K, Yamashita Y, Oki E, Minami K, Okamura T (2009) The triangulating stapling technique for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy. Surg Today 39:201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshida N, Baba Y, Watanabe M, Hiyoshi Y, Ishimoto T, Iwagami S, Kurashige J, Sakamoto Y, Miyamoto Y, Baba H (2015) Triangulating stapling technique covered with the pedicled omental flap for esophagogastric anastomosis: a safe anastomosis with fewer complications. J Am Coll Surg 220:e13–e16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oka M, Yamamoto K, Takahashi M et al (1996) Relationship between serum levels of interleukin 6, various disease parameters and malnutrition in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 56:2776–2780

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang LS, Chow KC, Wu CW (1999) Expression and up-regulation of interleukin-6 in esophageal carcinoma cells by n-sodium butyrate. Br J Cancer 80:1617–1622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoneda M, Fujiwara H, Furutani A et al (2013) Prognostic impact of tumor IL-6 expression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 33:2699–2705

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ogura M, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Nishi T, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Takahashi T, Wada N, Saikawa Y, Omori T, Miyasho T, Yamada S, Kitagawa Y (2013) Clinical significance of CXCL-8/CXCR-2 network in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surgery 154:512–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nishi T, Takeuchi H, Matsuda S, Ogura M, Kawakubo H, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Takahashi T, Wada N, Saikawa Y, Omori T, Kitagawa Y (2015) CXCR2 expression and postoperative complications affect long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 13:232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blaser MJ (2008) Understanding microbe-induced cancers. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 1:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chochi K, Ichikura T, Kinoshita M, Majima T, Shinomiya N, Tsujimoto H, Kawabata T, Sugasawa H, Ono S, Seki S, Mochizuki H (2008) Helicobacter pylori augments growth of gastric cancers via the lipopolysaccharide-toll-like receptor 4 pathway whereas its lipopolysaccharide attenuates antitumor activities of human mononuclear cells. Clin Cancer Res 14:2909–2917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bonnet M, Buc E, Sauvanet P, Darcha C, Dubois D, Pereira B, Dechelotte P, Bonnet R, Pezet D, Darfeuille-Michaud A (2014) Colonization of the human gut by E. coli and colorectal cancer risk. Clin Cancer Res 20:859–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Watanabe M, Mine S, Nishida K, Yamada K, Shigaki H, Oya S, Matsumoto A, Kurogochi T, Okamura A, Imamura Y, Sano T (2016) Improvement in short-term outcomes after esophagectomy with a multidisciplinary perioperative care team. Esophagus 13:337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miki Y, Toyokawa T, Kubo N, Tamura T, Sakurai K, Tanaka H, Muguruma K, Yashiro M, Hirakawa K, Ohira M (2017) C-reactive protein indicates early stage of postoperative infectious complications in patients following minimally invasive esophagectomy. World J Surg 41:796–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Okamura A, Watanabe M, Fukudome I, Yamashita K, Yuda M, Hayami M, Imamura Y, Mine S (2018) Relationship between visceral obesity and postoperative inflammatory response following minimally invasive esophagectomy. World J Surg 42:3651–3657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Asti E, Bonitta G, Melloni M, Tornese S, Milito P, Sironi A, Costa E, Bonavina L (2018) Utility of C-reactive protein as predictive biomarker of anastomotic leak after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 403:235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Park JK, Kim JJ, Moon SW (2017) C-reactive protein for the early prediction of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in both neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy case: a propensity score matching analysis. J Thorac Dis 9:3963–3702

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yamashita K, Watanabe M, Mine S, Toihata T, Fukudome I, Okamura A, Yuda M, Hayami M, Ishizuka N, Imamura Y (2018) Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. Surg Endosc 32:4443–4450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS et al (2019) Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 380:152–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, Ando M, Tsubosa Y, Koyanagi K, Daiko H, Matsuda S, Nakamura K, Kato K, Kitagawa Y (2016) A randomized phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG1409. Jpn J Clin Oncol 46:174–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rahman SH, Evans J, Toogood GJ, Lodge PA, Prasad KR (2008) Prognostic utility of postoperative C-reactive protein for posthepatectomy liver failure. Arch Surg 143:247–253 discussion 53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Thompson D, Pepys MB, Wood SP (1999) The physiological structure of human C-reactive protein and its complex with phosphocholine. Structure 7:169–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Watt DG, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2015) Routine clinical markers of the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response after elective operation: a systematic review. Surgery 157:362–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: all authors. Acquisition of data: all authors. Analysis and interpretation of data: Okamura, Watanabe, Yamashita, Mine. Drafting manuscript: Okamura, Watanabe, Yamashita, Mine. Critical revision of manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masayuki Watanabe.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PPTX 40 kb)

ESM 2

(PPTX 52 kb)

ESM 3

(PPTX 68 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 26 kb)

ESM 5

(DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okamura, A., Yamashita, K., Kozuki, R. et al. Inflammatory response and recurrence after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 404, 761–769 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01818-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01818-6

Keywords

Navigation