Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous versus surgical strategy for tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications

  • Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Tracheostomy is one of the most frequently performed procedures in intensive care medicine. The two main approaches are open surgical tracheostomy (ST) and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT). This systematic review summarizes and analyzes the existing evidence regarding perioperative and postoperative parameters of safety.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, and MEDLINE to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing complications of ST and PDT and to define the strategy with the lower risk of potentially life-threatening events. Risk of bias was assessed using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook.

Results

Twenty-four citations comprising 1795 procedures (PDT: n = 926; ST: n = 869) were found suitable for systematic review. No significant difference in the risk of a potentially life-threatening event (risk difference (RD) 0.01, 95% CI − 0.03 to 0.05, P = 0.62, I 2 = 47%) was found between PDT and ST. There was no difference in mortality (RD − 0.00, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.01, P = 0.88, I 2 = 0%). An increased rate of technical difficulties was shown for PDT (RD 0.04, 95% CI 0.01, 0.08, P = 0.01, I 2 = 60%). Stomal infection occurred more often with ST (RD − 0.05, 95% CI − 0.08 to − 0.02, P = 0.003, I 2 = 60%). Both techniques can be safely performed on the ICU. Meta-analysis of the duration of procedure was not possible owing to high heterogeneity (I 2 = 99%).

Conclusion

ST and PDT are safe techniques with low incidence of complications. Both techniques can be performed successfully in an ICU setting. ST can be performed on every patient whereas PDT is restricted by several contraindications like abnormal anatomy, previous surgery, coagulopathies, or difficult airway of the patient.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42015021967

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kollef MH, Ahrens TS, Shannon W (1999) Clinical predictors and outcomes for patients requiring tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 27(9):1714–1720. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199909000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, Buchman TG (2000) A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. CHEST J 118(5):1412–1418. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.118.5.1412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krankenhausstatistik F (2009) Operationen und Prozeduren der vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern-Ausführliche Darstellung. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marx WH, Ciaglia P, Graniero KD (1996) Some important details in the technique of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy via the modified Seldinger technique. CHEST J 110(3):762–766. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.110.3.762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mittendorf EA, McHenry CR, Smith CM, Yowler CJ (2002) Early and late outcome of bedside percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit/discussion. Am Surg 68(4):342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson C (1909) Tracheotomy. Laryngoscope 19(4):285–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C (1985) Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. CHEST J 87(6):715–719. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.87.6.715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zgoda MA, Berger R (2005) Balloon-facilitated percutaneous dilational tracheostomy tube placement: preliminary report of a novel technique. CHEST J 128(5):3688–3690. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.5.3688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Griggs WM, Worthley LI, Gilligan JE, Thomas PD, Myburg J (1990) A simple percutaneous tracheostomy technique. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170(6):543–545

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frova G, Quintel M (2002) A new simple method for percutaneous tracheostomy: controlled rotating dilation. Intensive Care Med 28(3):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-002-1218-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Byhahn C, Lischke V, Halbig S, Scheifler G, Westphal K (2000) Ciaglia blue rhino: a modified technique for percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: technique and early clinical results. Anaesthesist 49(3):202–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001010050815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fantoni A, Ripamonti D (1997) A non-derivative, non-surgical tracheostomy: the translaryngeal method. Intensive Care Med 23(4):386–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaiser E, Cantais E, Goutorbe P, Salinier L, Palmier B (2006) Prospective randomized comparison of progressive dilational vs forceps dilational percutaneous tracheostomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 34(1):51–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gysin C, Dulguerov P, Guyot J-P, Perneger TV, Abajo B, Chevrolet J-C (1999) Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: a double-blind randomized trial. Ann Surg 230(5):708–714. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199911000-00014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Douglas W, Flabouris A (1999) Surgical emphysema following percutaneous tracheostomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 27(1):69–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bodenham A, Diament R, Cohen A, Webster N (1991) Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anaesthesia 46(7):570–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09659.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leinhardt D, Mughal M, Bowles B, Glew R, Kishen R, MacBeath J, Irving M (1992) Appraisal of percutaneous tracheostomy. Br J Surg 79(3):255–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800790324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fikkers BG, van Veen JA, Kooloos JG, Pickkers P, van den Hoogen FJA, Hillen B, van der Hoeven JG (2004) Emphysema and pneumothorax after percutaneous tracheostomy: case reports and an anatomic study. Chest 125(5):1805–1814. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.125.5.1805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Guenther U, Vargas M, Pelosi P (2014) Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care 18(6):544. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Antonelli M, Michetti V, Di Palma A, Conti G, Pennisi MA, Arcangeli A, Montini L, Bocci MG, Bello G, Almadori G (2005) Percutaneous translaryngeal versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized trial with 1-yr double-blind follow-up. Crit Care Med 33(5):1015–1020. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000163401.77581.86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lukas J, Duskova J, Lukas D, Paska J, Stritesky M, Haas T (2007) Standard surgical versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in intensive care patients. Saudi Med J 28(10):1529–1533

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Youssef TF, Ahmed MR, Saber A (2011) Percutaneous dilatational versus conventional surgical tracheostomy in intensive care patients. N Am J Med Sci 3(11):508–512. https://doi.org/10.4297/najms.2011.3508

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Holdgaard H, Pedersen J, Jensen R, Outzen K, Midtgaard T, Johansen L, Møller J, Paaske P (1998) Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 42(5):545–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05164.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Celedón L, Walker J, Naser G, Neumann M, Nazar S (2007) Traqueostomía abierta vs traqueostomía percutánea. Rev otorrinolaringol cir cabeza cuello 67(3):222–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Massick DD, Yao S, Powell DM, Griesen D, Hobgood T, Allen JN, Schuller DE (2001) Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheotomy. Laryngoscope 111(3):494–500. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200103000-00021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bowen C, Whitney LR, Truwit JD, Durbin CG, Moore MM (2001) Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy. Am Surg 67(1):54–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Barba CA, Angood PB, Kauder DR, Latenser B, Martin K, McGonigal MD, Phillips GR, Rotondo MF, Schwab CW (1995) Bronchoscopic guidance makes percutaneous tracheostomy a safe, cost-effective, and easy-to-teach procedure. Surgery 118(5):879–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80279-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Nalos M (2006) Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 10(2):R55. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc4887

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Higgins KM, Punthakee X (2007) Meta‐analysis comparison of open versus percutaneous tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 117(3):447–454. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000251585.31778.c9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Oliver ER, Gist A, Gillespie MB (2007) Percutaneous versus surgical tracheotomy: an updated meta‐analysis. Laryngoscope 117(9):1570–1575. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e318093edae

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brass P, Hellmich M, Ladra A, Ladra J, Wrzosek A (2016) Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20(7):CD008045

    Google Scholar 

  32. Blot F, Similowski T, Trouillet JL, Chardon P, Korach JM, Costa MA, Journois D, Thiery G, Fartoukh M, Pipien I, Bruder N, Orlikowski D, Tankere F, Durand-Zaleski I, Auboyer C, Nitenberg G, Holzapfel L, Tenaillon A, Chastre J, Laplanche A (2008) Early tracheotomy versus prolonged endotracheal intubation in unselected severely ill ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 34(10):1779–1787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1195-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Klotz R, Klaiber U, Grummich K, Probst P, Diener MK, Büchler MW, Knebel P (2015) Percutaneous versus surgical strategy for tracheostomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications. Syst Rev 4(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Higgins, Julian PT, and Sally Green, (eds) 2011 Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Vol. 4. John Wiley & Sons

  37. Group GW (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ: Bri Med J 328(7454):1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ahn JJ, Koh YS, Chin JY, Lee KM, Park W, Hong SB, Shim TS, Lee SD, Kim WS, Kim DS (1998) Comparison of clinical efficacy between percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and surgical tracheostomy. Tuberculosis Respir Dis 45(6):1277–1283. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1998.45.6.1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Crofts SL, Alzeer A, GP MG, Wong DT, Charles D (1995) A comparison of percutaneous and operative tracheostomies in intensive care patients. Can J Anaesth 42(9):775–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03011175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Freeman BD, Isabella K, Cobb JP, Boyle WA III, Schmieg RE Jr, Kolleff MH, Lin N, Saak T, Thompson EC, Buchman TG (2001) A prospective, randomized study comparing percutaneous with surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 29(5):926–930. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200105000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Friedman Y, Fildes J, Mizock B, Samuel J, Patel S, Appavu S, Roberts R (1996) Comparison of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies. CHEST J 110(2):480–485. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.110.2.480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hasanloei MAV, Mahoori A, Bazzazi AM, Golzari SE, Karami T (2014) Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and surgically created thracheostomy in ICU patients. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 6(1):43

    Google Scholar 

  44. HAZARD P, JONES C, BENITONE J (1991) Comparative clinical trial of standard operative tracheostomy with percutaneous tracheostomy. Crit Care Med 19(8):1018–1024. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199108000-00008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Heikkinen M, Aarnio P, Hannukainen J (2000) Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy or conventional surgical tracheostomy? Crit Care Med 28(5):1399–1402. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200005000-00023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kaylie DM, Andersen PE, Wax MK (2003) An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(1):109–114. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2003.18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kumar AR, Mohanty S, Senthil K, Gopinath M (2005) Comparative study of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and conventional tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 57(3):202–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03008014

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Melloni G, Muttini S, Gallioli G, Carretta A (2002) Surgical tracheostomy versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a prospective-randomized study with long-term follow-up. J Cardiovasc Surg 43(1):113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Muttini S, Melloni G, Gemma M, Casati A, CARRETTA A, GIUDICI D, COZZI S, CHIESA G, GALLIOLI G, BERETTA L (1999) Tracheotomia percutanea e chirurgica: confronto prospettico, randomizzatodell’incidenza di complicanze precoci e tardive. Minerva Anestesiol 65(7–8):521–527

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Porter JM, Ivatury RR (1999) Preferred route of tracheostomy—percutaneous versus open at the bedside: a randomized, prospective study in the surgical intensive care unit. Am Surg 65(2):142–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Raine R, Michell W, Ruttmann T, Bloch M, Thorp M, Gough A Late outcome after guide-wire forceps percutaneous tracheostomy-a prospective, randomised comparison with open surgical tracheostomy. In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1999. PROF SCI PUBL TAVISTOCK HOUSE EAST, TAVISTOCK SQUARE, London, England WC1H 9JR, pp 168–168

  52. Silvester W, Goldsmith D, Uchino S, Bellomo R, Knight S, Seevanayagam S, Brazzale D, McMahon M, Buckmaster J, Hart GK (2006) Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up. Crit Care Med 34(8):2145–2152. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000229882.09677.FD

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Stocchetti N, Parma A, Lamperti M, Songa V, Tognini L (2000) Neurophysiological consequences of three tracheostomy techniques: a randomized study in neurosurgical patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 12(4):307–313. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008506-200010000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Stoeckli SJ, Breitbach T, Schmid S (1997) A clinical and histologic comparison of percutaneous dilational versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 107(12):1643–1646. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199712000-00012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sustic A, Krstulovic B, Eskinja N, Zelic M, Ledic D, Turina D (1976) Surgical tracheostomy versus percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in patients with anterior cervical spine fixation: preliminary report. Spine 27(17):1942–1945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tabaee A, Geng E, Lin J, Kakoullis S, McDonald B, Rodriguez H, Chong D (2005) Impact of neck length on the safety of percutaneous and surgical tracheotomy: a prospective, randomized study. Laryngoscope 115(9):1685–1690. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLG.0000175539.25182.2A

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wu J-K, Huang M-S, Tang G-J, Shih S-C, Yang C-C, Kao W-F, Huang M-H, Lee C-H (2003) Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus open tracheostomy—a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Chin Med Assoc: JCMA 66(8):467–473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yaghoobi S, Kayalha H, Ghafouri R, Yazdi Z, Khezri MB (2014) Comparison of complications in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy. Glob J Health Sci 6(4):p221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Chen B, Wei ZP, Li PF, Ni SL, Li JX, Tan JG (2008) Comparative study of percutaneous tracheostomy and conventional tracheostomy. Mod J Integr Tradit Chin West Med [xian Dai Zhong Xi Yi Jie He za Zhi] 17(5):705–706

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lukas J, Valvoda J, Rambousek P, Belohlavek J, Novak F, Stritesky M, Duskova J, Haas T (2006) Standard and puncture dilatation tracheostomy: comparison of results and complications. Otorinolaryngologie a Foniatrie 55(3):144–149

    Google Scholar 

  61. Xu J, Chen X, Pan Y (2007) Comparison between percutaneous dilational tracheotomy and surgical tracheotomy. Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi= Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 42(11):869–870

    Google Scholar 

  62. Cheng E, Fee WE (2000) Dilatational versus standard tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109(9):803–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940010900903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Reilly PM, Anderson HL, Sing RF, Schwab CW, Bartlett RH (1995) Occult hypercarbia: an unrecognized phenomenon during percutaneous endoscopic tracheostomy. CHEST J 107(6):1760–1763. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.107.6.1760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Reilly MP, Sing FR, Giberson AF, Anderson LH III, Rotondo FM, Tinkoff HG, Schwab WC (1997) Hypercarbia during tracheostomy: a comparison of percutaneous endoscopic, percutaneous Doppler, and standard surgical tracheostomy. Intensive Care Med 23(8):859–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by a grant from the Heidelberger Stiftung Chirurgie (https://www.stiftung-chirurgie.de/startseite.html).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MAW, MKD, MWB, PK, and RK designed the study. KG, MD, RK, and UK acquired the data; PK, PP, and RK analyzed and interpreted the data. MKD, PK, and RK drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa Klotz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOC 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klotz, R., Probst, P., Deininger, M. et al. Percutaneous versus surgical strategy for tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403, 137–149 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1648-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1648-8

Keywords

Navigation