Scorecard endoscopy: a pilot study to assess basic skills in trainees for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Abstract

Background. The development of training models and structured training courses for endoscopic techniques provides practical experience. To assess individual performance and progress in this training we developed and tested a scorecard system.

Methods. Three test groups were compared: group 1, ten physicians without previous endoscopic experience; group 2, ten students, without endoscopic experience; group 3, a control group of experienced endoscopists. Groups 1 and 2 underwent 1 week of training with a theoretical introduction and practical demonstrations. They were assessed by the scorecard daily by an experienced tutor. The individual scores and learning curves of the two beginner groups were compared with those of the expert group using a biosimulation model was used.

Results. Each participant improved significantly during the 1-week course. Mean scores on the first day in groups 1–3 were, respectively, 26.7±10.7, 33.4±5.3, and 72.0±5.8, and on day 6 they were 62.2±6.6, 63.4±7.6, and 86.6±4.3. The difference between group 3 and the other two groups was significant but not that between groups 1 and 2.

Conclusions. Training in endoscopy can be assessed using our training model and our scorecard protocol, which distinguishes between various levels of experience. In physicians beginning in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy this approach could help to reduce risks to patients, shorten learning curves, and exclude unskilled individuals from further fruitless interventions.