Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of two intermittent cooling strategies during prolonged work-rest intervals in the heat with personal protective gear compared with a control condition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Personal protective equipment (PPE) inhibits heat dissipation and elevates heat strain. Impaired cooling with PPE warrants investigation into practical strategies to improve work capacity and mitigate exertional heat illness.

Purpose

Examine physiological and subjective effects of forearm immersion (FC), fan mist (MC), and passive cooling (PC) following three intermittent treadmill bouts while wearing PPE.

Methods

Twelve males (27 ± 6 years; 57.6 ± 6.2 ml/kg/min; 78.3 ± 8.1 kg; 183.1 ± 7.2 cm) performed three 50-min (10 min of 40%, 70%, 40%, 60%, 50% vVO2max) treadmill bouts in the heat (36 °C, 30% relative humidity). Thirty minutes of cooling followed each bout, using one of the three strategies per trial. Rectal temperature (Tcore), skin temperature (Tsk), heart rate (HR), heart rate recovery (HRR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), thirst, thermal sensation (TS), and fatigue were obtained. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (condition x time) detected differences between interventions.

Results

Final Tcore was similar between trials (P > .05). Cooling rates were larger in FC and MC vs PC following bout one (P < .05). HRR was greatest in FC following bouts two (P = .013) and three (P < .001). Tsk, fluid consumption, and sweat rate were similar between all trials (P > .05). TS and fatigue during bout three were lower in MC, despite similar Tcore and HR.

Conclusion

Utilizing FC and MC during intermittent work in the heat with PPE yields some thermoregulatory and cardiovascular benefit, but military health and safety personnel should explore new and novel strategies to mitigate risk and maximize performance under hot conditions while wearing PPE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

ACU:

Army combat uniform

FC:

Forearm cooling

HR:

Heart rate

HRR:

Heart rate recovery

HRV:

Heart rate variability

MC:

Fan-mist cooling

NBC:

Nuclear, biological, or chemical

NBM:

Nude body mass

PC:

Passive cooling

PPE:

Personal protective gear

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

RPE:

Rate of perceived exertion

SD:

Standard deviation

Tcore :

Rectal temperature

Tsk :

Mean skin temperature

TS:

Thermal sensation

USG:

Urine-specific gravity

VO2max:

Maximal volume of oxygen uptake

VO2peak:

Peak value of oxygen uptake

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command for funding this study, as well as those who volunteered to participate.

Funding

This study was sponsored by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command under a research contract with The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc.; Award No.: W81XWH-17–2-0024. The cooling device used for forearm immersion was developed by First Line Technologies (Chantilly, VA, USA) which is a corporate sponsor of the Korey Stringer Institute, where this project was conducted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization and design: [Margaret C. Morrissey, Ciara N. Manning, Tushar Gulati, Srinivas Laxminarayan, Jaques Reifman, Douglas J. Casa]; Data collection: [Sean P. Langan, Margaret C. Morrissey, Ciara N. Manning]; Data analysis: [Sean P. Langan]; Writing – original draft preparation: [Sean P. Langan]; Writing – review and editing: [Sean P. Langan, Margaret C. Morrissey, Ciara N. Manning, Tushar Gulati, Srinivas Laxminarayan, Jaques Reifman, Douglas J. Casa]; Funding acquisition: [Douglas J. Casa]; Supervision: [Douglas J. Casa]. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean P. Langan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Korey Stringer Institute focuses on exertional heat illnesses and research aimed at maximizing performance, optimizing safety, and preventing sudden death in athletes, warfighters, and laborers.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the University of Connecticut Institutional Review Board and all procedures were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was also reviewed and approved by the U.S. Army Human Research Protections Office (Fort Detrick, MD).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Communicated by Narihiko kondo.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the U.S. Army, the U.S. Department of Defense, or The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. This paper has been approved for public release with unlimited distribution.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Langan, S.P., Manning, C.N., Morrissey, M.C. et al. Efficacy of two intermittent cooling strategies during prolonged work-rest intervals in the heat with personal protective gear compared with a control condition. Eur J Appl Physiol 123, 1125–1134 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05139-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05139-x

Keywords

Navigation