Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a novel approach for predicting the one-repetition maximum (1RM). The prediction is based on the force–velocity and load–velocity relationships determined from measured force and velocity data collected during resistance-training exercises with incremental submaximal loads. 1RM was determined as the load corresponding to the intersection of these two curves, where the gravitational force exceeds the force that the subject can exert.
Methods
The proposed force–velocity-based method (FVM) was tested on 37 participants (23.9 ± 3.1 year; BMI 23.44 ± 2.45) with no specific resistance-training experience, and the predicted 1RM was compared to that achieved using a direct method (DM) in chest-press (CP) and leg-press (LP) exercises.
Results
The mean 1RM in CP was 99.5 kg (±27.0) for DM and 100.8 kg (±27.2) for FVM (SEE = 1.2 kg), whereas the mean 1RM in LP was 249.3 kg (±60.2) for DM and 251.1 kg (±60.3) for FVM (SEE = 2.1 kg). A high correlation was found between the two methods for both CP and LP exercises (0.999, p < 0.001). Good agreement between the two methods emerged from the Bland and Altman plot analysis.
Conclusion
These findings suggest the use of the proposed methodology as a valid alternative to other indirect approaches for 1RM prediction. The mathematical construct is simply based on the definition of the 1RM, and it is fed with subject’s muscle strength capacities measured during a specific exercise. Its reliability is, thus, expected to be not affected by those factors that typically jeopardize regression-based approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- 1RM:
-
One-repetition maximum
- FVM:
-
Force–velocity-based method
- LP:
-
Leg press
- CP:
-
Chest press
- DM:
-
Direct method
References
Abadie BR, Wentworth MC (2000) Prediction of one repetition maximal strength from a 5–10 repetition submaximal strength test in college-aged females. J Exerc Physiol 3:1–6
Bosco C, Belli A, Astrua M, Tihanyi J, Pozzo R, Kellis S, Tsarpela O, Foti C, Manno R, Tranquilli C (1995) A dynamometer for evaluation of dynamic muscle work. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 70:379–386
Bosquet L, Porta-Benache J, Blais J (2010) Validity of a commercial linear encoder to estimate bench press 1 RM from the force-velocity relationship. J Sports Sci Med 9:459–463
Brown LE, Weir JP (2001) ASEP procedures recommendation I: accurate assessment of muscular strength and power. JEPonline 4:1–21
Dohoney P, Chromiak JA, Lemire D, Abadie BR, Kovacs C (2002) Prediction of one repetition maximum (1-RM) strength from a 4–6 RM and a 7–10 RM submaximal strength test in healthy young adult males. J Exerc Physiol 5:54–59
Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ (2004) Designing resistance training programs. Human Kinetics, Champaign
García-Ramos A, Padial P, Haff GG, Argüelles-Cienfuegos J, García-Ramos M, Conde-Pipó J, Feriche B (2015) Effect of different interrepetition rest periods on barbell velocity loss during the ballistic bench press exercise. J Strength Cond Res 29:2388–2396
González-Badillo JJ, Marques MC, Sánchez-Medina L (2001) The importance of movement velocity as a measure to control resistance training intensity. J Hum Kinet 29:15–19
Izquierdo M, González-Badillo JJ, Häkkinen K, Ibáñez J, Kraemer WJ, Altadill A, Eslava J, Gorostiaga EM (2006) Effect of loading on unintentional lifting velocity declines during single sets of repetitions to failure during upper and lower extremity muscle actions. Int J Sports Med 27:718–724
Jane GK (1995) Iso-inertial measurement of muscular strength: an assessment alternative. In: Proceedings of the 13rd international symposium on biomechanics in sports. T. Bauer, eds. Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, pp 330–335
Jidovtseff B, Croisier J, Scimar N, Demoulin C, Maquet D, Crielaard J (2008) The ability of isoinertial assessment to monitor specific training effects. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 48:55–64
Jidovtseff B, Harris NK, Crielaard J-M, Cronin JB (2011) Using the load-velocity relationship for 1RM prediction. J Strength Cond Res 25:267–270
Kim PS, Mayhew JL, Peterson DF (2002) A modified YMCA bench press test as a predictor of 1 repetition maximum bench press strength. J Strength Cond Res 16:440–445
Kravitz L, Akalan C, Nowicki K, Kinzey SJ (2003) Prediction of 1 repetition maximum in high-school power lifters. J Strength Cond Res 17:167–172
LeSuer DA, McCormick JH, Mayhew JL, Wasserstein RL, Arnold MD (1997) The accuracy of prediction equations for estimating 1-RM performance in the bench press, squat, and deadlift. J Strength Cond Res 11:211–221
Lund R, Dolny D, Browder K (2006) Strength-power relationships during two lower extremity movements in female division I rowers. J Exerc Physiol 9:41–52
Mayhew JL, Prinster JL, Ware JS, Zimmer DL, Arabas JR, Bemben MG (1995) Muscular endurance repetitions to predict bench press strength in men of different training levels. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 35:108–113
Mayhew JL, Johnson BD, Lamonte MJ, Laube D, Kemmler W (2008) Accuracy of prediction equations for determining one repetition maximum bench press in women before and after resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 22:1570–1577
Meylan CM, Cronin JB, Oliver JL, Hughes MM, Jidovtseff B, Pinder S (2015) The reliability of isoinertial force-velocity-power profiling and maximal strength assessment in youth. Sports Biomech 14:68–80
Niewiadomski W, Laskowska D, Gasiorowaska A, Cybulski G, Strasz A, Langfort J (2008) Determination and prediction of one repetition maximum (1RM): safety considerations. J Hum Kinet 19:109–120
Padulo J, Mignogna P, Mignardi S, Tonni F, D’Ottavio S (2012) Effect of different pushing speeds on bench press. Int J Sports Med 33:376–380
Pearson SN, Cronin JB, Hume PA, Slyfield D (2009) Kinematics and kinetics of the bench-press and bench-pull exercises in a strength-trained sporting population. Sports Biomech 8:245–254
Rahmani A, Viale F, Dalleau G, Lacour JR (2001) Force/velocity and power/velocity relationships in squat exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 84:227–232
Reynolds JM, Gordon TJ, Robergs RA (2006) Prediction of one repetition maximum strength from multiple repetition maximum testing and anthropometry. J Strength Cond Res 20:584–592
Ritti-Dias RM, Avelar A, Salvador EP, Cyrino ES (2011) Influence of previous experience on resistance training on reliability of one-repetition maximum test. J Strength Cond Res 25(5):1418–1422
Rontu J-P, Hannula MI, Leskinen S, Linnamo V, Salmi JA (2010) One-repetition maximum bench press performance estimated with a new accelerometer method. J Strength Cond Res 24:2018–2025
Sakamoto A, Sinclair PJ (2006) Effect of movement velocity on the relationship between training load and the number of repetitions of bench press. J Strength Cond Res 20:523–527
Squadrone R, Rodano R, Preatoni E (2012) Comparison of velocity and power output data derived from an inertial based system and an optical encoder during squat lifts in a weight room setting. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 52:40–46
Tranquilli C, Bernetti A, Picerno P (2013) Ambulatory joint mobility and muscle strength assessment during rehabilitation using a single wearable inertial sensor. Med Sport 66(4):583–597
Vandewalle H, Peres G, Heller J, Panel J, Monod H (1987) Force-velocity relationship and maximal power on a cycle ergometer. Correlation with the height of a vertical jump. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 56:650–656
Ware J, Clemens C, Mayhew J, Johnston T (1995) Muscular endurance repetitions to predict bench pressand squat strength in college football players. J Strength Cond Res 9:99–103
Acknowledgments
No grant support was provided for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Anni Vanhatalo.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Picerno, P., Iannetta, D., Comotto, S. et al. 1RM prediction: a novel methodology based on the force–velocity and load–velocity relationships. Eur J Appl Physiol 116, 2035–2043 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3457-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3457-0