Skip to main content
Log in

Validity of perceived skin wettedness mapping to evaluate heat strain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of a newly developed method for quantifying perceived skin wettedness (W p) as an index to evaluate heat strain. Eight male subjects underwent 12 experimental conditions: activities (rest and exercise) × clothing (Control, Tyvek and Vinyl condition) × air temperatures (25 and 32°C). To quantify the W p, a full body map with 21 demarcated regions was presented to the subject. The results showed that (1) at rest in 25°C, W p finally reached 4.4, 8.3 and 51.6% of the whole body surface area for Control, Tyvek, and Vinyl conditions, respectively, while W p at rest in 32°C rose to 35.8, 61.4 and 89.8%; (2) W p has a distinguishable power to detect the most wetted and the first wetted regions. The most wetted body regions were the upper back, followed by the chest, front neck, and forehead. The first perceived regions in the skin wetted map were the chest, forehead, and upper back; (3) W p at rest showed a significant relationship with the calculated skin wettedness (w) (r = 0.645, p < 0.01) and (4) W p had a significant relationship with core temperature, skin temperature, heart rate, total sweat rate, thermal comfort, and humidity sensation (p < 0.05), but these relationships were dependent on the level of activities and clothing insulation. W p in hot environments was more valid as a heat strain index of workers wearing normal clothing in light works, rather than wearing impermeable protective clothing in strenuous works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berglund LR, Cunningham DJ (1986) Parameters of human discomfort in warm environment. ASHRAE Trans 92:732–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Candas V, Vogt JJ, Libert JP (1979) Human skin wettedness and evaporative efficiency of sweating. J Appl Physiol 46(3):522–528

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark RP, Edholm OG (1985) Man and his thermal environment. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty TJ, Arens E (1988) Evaluation of the physiological bases of thermal comfort models. ASHRAE Trans 94:1371–1385

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanger PO (1970) Thermal comfort. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukazawa T, Havenith G (2009) Differences in comfort perception in relation to local and whole body skin wettedness. Eur J Appl Physiol 106:15–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gagge AP (1937) A new physiological variable associated with sensible and insensible perspiration. Am J Physiol 120:277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagge AP, Gonzalez RR (1974) Physiological and physical factors associated with warm discomfort in sedentary man. Environ Res 7:230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagge AP, Stolwijk JAJ, Nishi Y (1969a) The prediction of thermal comfort when thermal equilibrium is maintained by sweating. ASHRAE Trans 75:108–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagge AP, Stolwijk JAJ, Saltin B (1969b) Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses during exercise at various ambient temperatures. Environ Res 2:209–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Havenith G, Holmér I, Parson K (2002) Personal factors in thermal comfort assessment: clothing, properties and metabolic heat production. Energy Build 34:581–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzman AB, Randall WC, Peiss CN, Seckendorf R (1953) Regional rates of evaporation from the skin at various environmental temperatures. J Appl Physiol 5:153–161

    Google Scholar 

  • IUPS Thermal Commission (2001) Glossary of terms for thermal physiology. Jpn J Physiol 51(2):245–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Choi JW (2009) Estimation of regional body surface area covered by clothing. J Hum-Environ Syst 12(1):35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Choi JW, Kim H (2008) Determination of body surface area and formulas to estimate body surface area using the Alginate method. J Physiol Anthropol 27(2):71–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y (2005) Perceptions of temperature, moisture and comfort in clothing during environmental transients. Ergonomics 48(3):234–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JW, Nadel ER, Stolwijk JAJ (1972) Respiratory weight losses during exercise. J Appl Physiol 32(4):474–476

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadel ER, Stolwijk JAJ (1973) Effect of skin wittedness on sweat gland response. J Appl Physiol 35(5):689–694

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadel ER, Bullard RW, Stolwijk JAJ (1971a) Importance of skin temperature in the regulation of sweating. J Appl Physiol 31(1):80–87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadel ER, Mitchell JW, Stolwijk JAJ (1971b) Control of local and total sweating during exercise transients. Int J Biometeor 15:201–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons KC (2003) Human thermal environments, 2nd edn. CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall WC (1946) Quantitization and regional distribution of sweat glands in man. J Clin Invest 25:761–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltin B, Gagge AP, Bergh U, Stolwiji JAJ (1972) Body temperatures and sweating during exhaustive exercise. J Appl Physiol 32(5):635–643

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stolwijk JAJ, Nadel ER, Mitchell JW, Saltin B (1971) Modification of central sweating drive at the periphery. Int J Biometeor 15:268–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storaas G, Bakkevig MK (1996) Correlation between measured skin wettedness and subjective sensations of skin wetness. The 7th International Conference on Environmental Ergonomics (ICEE). pp 131–134

  • Tamura T (2006) Development of a two-layer movable sweating thermal manikin. Ind Health 44:441–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toftum J, Jørgensen AS, Fanger PO (1998) Upper limits for indoor air humidity to avoid uncomfortably humid skin. Energy Build 28:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withers PC (1992) Comparative animal physiology. Saunders College Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu T, Arens EA, Bauman FS (1995) The effects of high-level air humidity on subjective perception of comfort. Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on HAVC. pp 81–91

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our thanks to Su-Young Son, Mutsuhiro Fujiwara, Shizuka Umezaki, Andrew J. Cookson and Maurice Montalvo for their technical advice and secretarial support. We are grateful to all subjects for their participation. This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21·09128).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joo-Young Lee.

Additional information

Communicated by Narihiko Kondo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, JY., Nakao, K. & Tochihara, Y. Validity of perceived skin wettedness mapping to evaluate heat strain. Eur J Appl Physiol 111, 2581–2591 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1882-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1882-7

Keywords

Navigation