Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of three portable blood lactate analysers: Lactate Pro, Lactate Scout and Lactate Plus

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three portable blood lactate analysers, Lactate Pro (LP), Lactate Scout (LS) and Lactate Plus (L+), were evaluated. Analyser reliability and accuracy was assessed. For reliability, intra- and inter-analyser comparisons demonstrated that the LP (intra-TE = 0.5 mM, inter-TE = 0.4 mM) and L+ (intra-TE = 0.4, inter-TE = 0.4 mM) displayed greater overall reliability than the LS (intra-TE = 1.0, inter-TE = 0.8 mM). At BLa < 4.0 mM, the LP (intra-TE = 0.1 mM) demonstrated greater reliability than the LS (intra-TE = 0.5 mM) and L+ (intra-TE = 0.4 mM). At BLa > 8.0 mM, the LP (intra-TE = 0.5 mM, inter-TE = 0.4 mM) and L+ (intra- and inter-TE = 0.4 mM) displayed greater reliability than the LS (intra-TE = 1.1 mM, inter-TE = 0.9 mM). For accuracy, the L+ (SEE = 0.6 mM) compared more favourably to the LP than the LS (SEE = 1.1 mM). At BLa ~1.0–18.0 mM, the LS produced values that were up to 0.9 mM higher than the LP; the L+ produced BLa that were within ±0.1 mM. All portable analysers tended to under-read the ABL 700 analyser. The suitability of the LP and L+ as accurate analysers is supported by strong correlations (r = 0.91 and r = 0.94) and limits of agreement ≤2.1 mM. This study showed that the LP and L+, compared well to each other, displayed good reliability and accuracy when compared to a laboratory-based analyser. Although the LS also displayed relatively good reliability, it was not as reliable or accurate as the LP or L+.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 32:307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldari C, Bonavolonta V, Emerenziani GP, Gallotta MC, Silva AJ, Guidetti L (2009) Accuracy, reliability, linearity of Accutrend and Lactate Pro versus EBIO plus analyser. Eur J Appl Physiol 107:105–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley DJ, McNaughton LR, Thompson D, Vleck VE, Batterham A (2001) Peak power output, the lactate threshold, and time trial performance in cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:2077–2081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdon P (2000) Blood lactate transition thresholds: concepts and controversies. In: Gore C (ed) Physiological tests for elite athletes. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 50–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JD, Bourdon PC, Woolford SM (2003) Effect of measuring blood lactate concentrations using different automated lactate analysers on blood lactate transition thresholds. J Sci Med Sport 6(4):408–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen B, Schwartz L, Urhausen A, Kindermann W (1991) Control of training in middle and long distance running by means of the individual anaerobic threshold. Int J Sports Med 12:519–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs I (1986) Blood lactate: implications for training and sports performance. Sports Med 3:10–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AM, Carter H (2000) The effect of endurance training on parameters of aerobic fitness. Sports Med 29:373–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacRae HSH, Dennis SC, Bosch AN, Noakes TD (1992) Effects of training on lactate production and removal during progressive exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol 72:1649–1656

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makita S (1997) Reliability of simplified blood lactate test meter. J Clin Sports Med 14:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton LR, Thompson D, Phillips G, Backx K, Crickmore L (2002) A comparison of the Lactate Pro, Accusport, Analox GM7 and Kodak Ektachem lactate analysers in normal, hot and humid conditions. Int J Sports Med 23:130–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pyne DB, Boston T, Martin DT, Logan A (2000) Evaluation of the Lactate Pro blood lactate analyser. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:112–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sjodin B, Jacobs I (1981) Onset of blood lactate accumulation and marathon running performance. Int J Sports Med 2:23–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Someren KA, Howatson G, Nunan S, Thatcher R, Shave R (2005) Comparison of the Lactate Pro and Analox GM7 blood lactate analysers. Int J Sports Med 26:657–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshisa T, Chida M, Ichioka M, Suda Y (1987) Blood lactate parameters related to aerobic capacity and endurance performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:7–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by the National Sport Science Quality Assurance program and the Australian Institute of Sport. Lactate analysers and materials were kindly provided by KDK Japan, SensLab GmbH, Germany and Nova Biomedical, USA. The authors also thank Prof. David Pyne for his assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca K. Tanner.

Additional information

Communicated by Susan Ward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanner, R.K., Fuller, K.L. & Ross, M.L.R. Evaluation of three portable blood lactate analysers: Lactate Pro, Lactate Scout and Lactate Plus. Eur J Appl Physiol 109, 551–559 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1379-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1379-9

Keywords

Navigation