Skip to main content
Log in

Movement of the upper body and muscle activity patterns following a rapidly applied load: the influence of pre-load alterations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sudden loading of the spine is not only considered a risk factor for the development of low-back pain but also enables an evaluation of the stability of the spine when conducted under laboratory conditions. In the present study the upper spine was pulled in the anterior direction and the stiffness as well as activity in the erector spinae muscle was measured with different pre-tension in the erector spinae. The results showed that increased activity in the erector spinae prior to loading led to increased stiffness (stiffness coefficients from 297 Nm rad−1 to 438 Nm rad−1) and a decrease in the extra neural signal input to the muscles to maintain the stability. It is therefore clear that increased tension in the erector spinae muscle will create a larger stability of the spine to anterior perturbations. However, contracting the muscles around the spine increases the load on the spinal structures. In 34% of the experiments a silent period in the electromyographic signal was present after loading in the period when the torso was moving in the anterior direction. This phenomenon is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aoki H, Tsukahara R, Yabe K (1989) Effects of pre-motion electromyographic silent period on dynamic force exertion during a rapid ballistic movement in man. Eur J Physiol Occup Physiol 58:426–432

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage P, Berry G (1994) Statistical methods in medical research, 3rd edn. Blackwell, London

  • Asmussen E, Bonde-Petersen F (1974) Storage of elastic energy in man. Acta Physiol Scand 91:385–392

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard B (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back, 2nd edn. Department of Health and Human Services, NIOSH, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull Andersen T, Schibye B, Skotte J (2001) Sudden movements of the spinal column during health-care work. Int J Ind Ergon 28:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavagna G (1977) Storage and utilization of elastic energy in skeletal muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 5:89–129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cholewicki J, McGill S (1996) Mechanical stability of the in-vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. Clin Biomech 11:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cholewicki J, Juluru K, Radebold A, Panjabi M, McGill S (1999) Lumbar spine stability can be augmented with an abdominal belt and/or increased intra-abdominal pressure. Eur Spine J 8:388–395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cholewicki J, Simons A, Radebold A (2000) Effects of external trunk loads on lumbar spine stability. J Biomech 33:1377–1385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan P, Adams M (1993) The relationship between EMG activity and extensor moment generation in the erector spinae muscles during bending and lifting activities. J Biomech 26:513–522

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dyhre-Poulsen P, Laursen A (1984) Programmed electromyographic activity and negative incremental muscle stiffness in monkeys jumping downward. J Physiol (Lond) 350:121–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyhre-Poulsen P, Simonsen E Voigt M (1991) Dynamic control of muscle stiffness and H reflex modulation during hopping and jumping in man. J Physiol (Lond) 437:287–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenn W (1924) The relation between the work performed and the energy liberated in muscular contraction. J Physiol (Lond) 58:373–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Granata K Marras W (2000) Cost-benefit of muscle contraction in protecting against spinal instability. Spine 25:1398–1404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grob D, Dvorak J (1991) Temporary segmental fixation of the cervical spine. Europeean Spine Society, Rome

  • Hodges P, Bui B (1996) A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using surface electromyography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 101:511–519

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen A, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Djorup A, Jahnsen H (1978) Programmed pattern of muscular activity in monkeys landing from a leap. Acta Physiol Scand 102:492–494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavender S, Mirka G, Schoenmarklin R, Sommerich C, Sudhakar L, Marras W (1989) The effects of preview and task symmetry on trunk muscle response to sudden loading. Hum Factors 31:101–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning D, Mitchell R, Blanchfield L (1984) Body movements and events contributing to accidental and nonaccidental back injuries. Spine 9:734–739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mannion A, Adams M, Dolan P (2000) Sudden and unexpected loading generates high forces in the lumbar spine. Spine 25:842–852

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan D (1977) Separation of active and passive components of short-range stiffness of muscle. Am J Physiol 232:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Panjabi M (1992a) The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disord 5:383–389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Panjabi M (1992b) The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord 5:390–397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Press W, Teukolsky S, Vetterling W, Flannery B (1992) Numerical recipes in Fortran, the art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Stokes I, Gardner-Morse M, Henry S, Badger G (2000) Decrease in trunk muscular response to pertubation with preactivation of lumbar spinal musculature. Spine 25:1957–1964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanii K (1996) Comparative study of the premovement muscle silent period and the premovement cortical potential in different modes of voluntary contraction. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 36:99–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J, Lavender S, Corcos D, Andersson G (1998) Trunk kinematics and trunk muscle activity during a rapidly applied load. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 8:215–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka M, Wolf W, Staude G, Konstanzer A, Dengler R (1993) Inhibition of EMG activity in isometrically loaded agonist muscle preceding a rapid contraction. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 33:271–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilder D, Aleksiev A, Magnusson M, Pope M, Spratt K, Goel V (1996) Muscular response to sudden load. A tool to evaluate fatigue and rehabilitation. Spine 21:2628–2639

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter D (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

  • Yabe K (1976) Premotion silent period in rapid voluntary movement. J Appli Physiol 41:470–473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young H, Freedman R (1996) University Physics, 9th edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Bull Andersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bull Andersen, T., Essendrop, M. & Schibye, B. Movement of the upper body and muscle activity patterns following a rapidly applied load: the influence of pre-load alterations. Eur J Appl Physiol 91, 488–492 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1040-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1040-6

Keywords

Navigation