Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antineoplastic drug contamination in the urine of Canadian healthcare workers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to quantify the urine concentration of non-metabolized cyclophosphamide (CP), a commonly administered antineoplastic drug, among potentially exposed Canadian healthcare workers and to identify factors associated with the drug concentration levels.

Methods

Participants were asked to provide two sets of 24-h urine samples (at two different sampling events), and the level of CP was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. In addition to demographic information, participants were surveyed regarding their frequency of handling of antineoplastic drugs, safe drug handling training, and known contact with CP on their work shift. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed. A backward stepwise linear mixed effect model was conducted to identify the factors associated with urine concentration levels.

Results

We collected 201 urine samples, and 55 % (n = 111) had levels greater than the LOD of 0.05 ng/mL. The mean urinary CP concentration was 0.156 ng/mL, the geometric mean was 0.067 ng/mL, the geometric standard deviation was 3.18, the 75th percentile was 0.129 ng/mL, and the range was <LOD to 2.37 ng/mL. All eight job categories evaluated had some urinary concentrations in excess of the LOD with unit clerks having the highest average level. Workers who worked in the drug administration unit, but were not responsible for administering the drugs to patients, i.e., volunteers, oncologists, ward aides, and dieticians, had the largest proportion of samples exceeding the LOD. We did not find any correlation between the urinary concentration levels and known contact with CP during the work shift. Two factors were found to be significantly associated with urinary CP concentration: (1) Workers who had a duty to handle antineoplastic drugs had higher concentration levels, and (2) workers who had not received safe drug handling training had higher levels of CP in their urine compared with those who had.

Conclusions

The presence of non-metabolized CP in urine confirms that, despite the existence of control measures, a broad range of healthcare workers are at risk of exposure to antineoplastic drugs. A review of the effectiveness of interventions to reduce exposure is warranted and should apply to all healthcare workers involved in some capacity with the hospital medication system. This study identified two factors that are related to the urine CP concentration levels which can serve as an impetus for reducing exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. If duplicate response varied by more than 10 %, the batch was re-analyzed to see whether the instrument was an issue or the extraction. Some samples were re-run and the resulting concentrations were used for this study.

  2. Assumed that “day” is equivalent to 24 h.

References

  • Bos PM, Brouwer DH, Stevenson H, Boogaard PJ, de Kort WL, van Hemmen JJ (1998) Proposal for the assessment of quantitative dermal exposure limits in occupational environments: part 1. Development of a concept to derive a quantitative dermal occupational exposure limit. Occup Environ Med 55(12):795–804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burgaz S, Karahalil B, Bayrak P et al (1999) Urinary cyclophosphamide excretion and micronuclei frequencies in peripheral lymphocytes and in exfoliated buccal epithelial cells of nurses handling antineoplastics. Mutat Res 439(1):97–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connor TH, McDiarmid MA (2006) Preventing occupational exposures to antineoplastic drugs in health care settings. CA Cancer J Clin 56(6):354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor TH, DeBord DG, Pretty JR et al (2010) Evaluation of antineoplastic drug exposure of health care workers at three university-based US cancer centers. J Occup Environ Med 52(10):1019–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jonge ME, Huitema ADR, Rodenhuis S, Beijnen JH (2005) Clinical pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide. Clin Pharmacokinet 44(11):1135–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dranitsaris G, Johnston M, Poirier S et al (2005) Are health care providers who work with cancer drugs at an increased risk for toxic events? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Oncol Pharm Pract 11(2):69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favier B, Gilles L, Desage M, Latour JF (2003) Analysis of cyclophosphamide in the urine of antineoplastic drugs handlers. Bull Cancer 90(10):905–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransman W, Vermeulen R, Kromhout H (2005) Dermal exposure to cyclophosphamide in hospitals during preparation, nursing and cleaning activities. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78(5):403–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ganser GH, Hewett P (2010) An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data. J Occup Environ Hyg 7(4):233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedmer M, Tinnerberg H, Axmon A, Joensson BAG (2008) Environmental and biological monitoring of antineoplastic drugs in four workplaces in a Swedish hospital. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81(7):899–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helsel D (2010) Much ado about next to nothing: incorporating nondetects in science. Ann Occup Hyg 54(3):257–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hon C-Y, Astrakianakis G, Danyluk Q, Chu WC (2011a) Pilot evaluation of dermal contamination by antineoplastic drugs among hospital pharmacy personnel. Can J Hosp Pharm 64(5):327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Hon C-Y, Teschke K, Chua PPS, Venners S, Nakashima L (2011b) Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs: identification of job categories potentially exposed throughout the hospital medication system. Saf Health Work 2(3):273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hon C-Y, Teschke K, Chu W, Demers P, Venners S (2013) Antineoplastic drug contamination of surfaces throughout the hospital medication system in canadian hospitals. J Occup Environ Hyg 10(7):374–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hon C-Y, Barzan C, Astrakianakis G (2014a) Identification of knowledge gaps regarding healthcare workers’ exposure to antineoplastic drugs: review of literature, North America versus Europe. Saf Health Work. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2014.06.001

  • Hon C-Y, Teschke K, Demers PA, Venners S (2014b) Antineoplastic drug contamination on the hands of employees working throughout the hospital medication system. Ann Occup Hyg. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meu019

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung R, Reed L (1990) Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Am Ind Hyg J 5(1):46–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jakubowski Marek, Trzcinka-Ochocka M (2005) Biological monitoring of exposure: trends and key developments. J Occup Health 47(1):22–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mason HJ, Blair S, Sams C, Jones K, Garfitt SJ, Cuschieri MJ, Baxter PJ (2005) Exposure to antineoplastic drugs in two UK hospital pharmacy units. Ann Occup Hyg 49(7):603–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid MA, Oliver MS, Roth TR, Rogers B, Escalante C (2010) Chromosome 5 and 7 abnormalities in oncology personnel handling anticancer drugs. J Occup Environ Med 52(10):1028–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH (2004) Preventing occupational exposure to antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs in health care settings (2004–2165). Accessed 30 Nov 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2004-165/

  • Pethran A, Schierl R, Hauff K et al (2003) Uptake of antineoplastic agents in pharmacy and hospital personnel. Part I: monitoring of urinary concentrations. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76(1):5–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie MA, McAdams C, Fritz N (2000) Exposure risk in the handling and administration of chemotherapy agents: a review and synthesis of the literature. Online J Knowl Synth Nurs 7(1):51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent EV, Naumann BD, Dolan DG, Faria EC, Schulman L (2002) The importance of human data in the establishment of occupational exposure limits. Human Ecol Risk Assess 8:805–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sessink PJ, Van de Kerkhof MC, Anzion RB, Noordhoek J, Bos RP (1994) Environmental contamination and assessment of exposure to antineoplastic agents by determination of cyclophosphamide in urine of exposed pharmacy technicians: is skin absorption an important exposure route? Arch Environ Health 49(3):165–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sottani C, Porro B, Comelli M, Imbriani M, Minoia C (2010) An analysis to study trends in occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs among health care workers. J Chromat B 878(27):2593–2605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sottani C, Porro B, Imbriani M, Minoia C (2011) Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs in four italian health care settings. Toxicol Lett 213(1):107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura S, Asano M, Kinoshita K, Tanimura M, Nabeshima T (2011a) Risks to health professionals from hazardous drugs in japan: a pilot study of environmental and biological monitoring of occupational exposure to cyclophosphamide. J Oncol Pharm Pract 17(1):14–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura S, Nakanishi H, Asano M et al (2011b) Multicenter study for environmental and biological monitoring of occupational exposure to cyclophosphamide in Japan. J Oncol Pharm Pract 17(1):20–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suspiro A, Prista J (2011) Biomarkers of occupational exposure do anticancer agents: a minireview. Toxicol Lett 207(1):42–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanimura M, Yamada K, Sugiura S et al (2009) An environmental and biological study of occupational exposure to cyclophosphamide in the pharmacy of a japanese community hospital designated for the treatment of cancer. J Health Sci 55:750–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turci R, Minoia C, Sottani C et al (2010) Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs in seven Italian hospitals: the effect of quality assurance and adherence to guidelines. J Oncol Pharm Pract 17(4):320–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2011) Series 875: chemical safety and pollution prevention. Accessed 26 Oct 2011. http://www.epa.gov/ocspp/pubs/frs/publications/Test_Guidelines/series875.htm

  • Villarini M, Dominici L, Piccinini R et al (2011) Assessment of primary, oxidative and excision repaired DNA damage in hospital personnel handling antineoplastic drugs. Mutagenesis 26(3):359–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the WorkSafeBC Research Secretariat for funding this Project (RS2008-OG01). We also appreciate the time and cooperation of all participants and their respective facilities. We would like to recognize the assistance of the Dr. Winnie Chu from University of British Columbia who led the team responsible for sample analyses. We would like to acknowledge Jennifer Shum, Pearl Siganporia, and Sarah Chiarello who helped with sample collection efforts.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Yip Hon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hon, CY., Teschke, K., Shen, H. et al. Antineoplastic drug contamination in the urine of Canadian healthcare workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 88, 933–941 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1026-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1026-1

Keywords

Navigation