Abstract
The process of fluorescence starts with the efficient generation of light that is required for the excitation of fluorophores. As such, light sources are a crucial component of a fluorescence microscope. Choosing the right illumination tool can not only improve the quality of experimental results, but also the microscope’s economic and environmental footprint. While arc lamps have historically proven to be a reliable light source for widefield fluorescence microscopy, solid-state light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have become the light source of choice for new fluorescence microscopy systems. In this paper, we demonstrate that LEDs have superior light stability on all timescales tested and use less electrical power than traditional light sources when used at lower power outputs. They can be readily switched on and off electronically, have a longer lifetime and they do not contain mercury, and thus are better for the environment. We demonstrate that it is important to measure light source power output during warm-up and switching, as a light source’s responsiveness (in terms of power) can be quite variable. Several general protocols for testing light source stability are presented. A detailed life cycle analysis shows that an LED light source can have a fourfold lower environmental impact when compared to a metal halide source.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Albeanu DF, Soucy E, Sato TF, Meister M, Murthy VN (2008) LED arrays as cost effective and efficient light sources for widefield microscopy. PLoS One 3:e2146. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002146
Aswani K, Jinadasa T, Brown CM (2012) Fluorescence microscopy light sources. Microsc Today 20:22–28
Baird TR, Kaufman D, Brown CM (2014) Mercury free microscopy: an opportunity for core facility directors. J Biomol Tech 25:48–53. https://doi.org/10.7171/jbt.14-2502-001
Boudreau C, Wee TL, Duh YR, Couto MP, Ardakani KH, Brown CM (2016) Excitation light dose engineering to reduce photo-bleaching and photo-toxicity. Sci Rep 6:30892. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30892
Cole RW, Turner JN (2008) Light-emitting diodes are better illumination sources for biological microscopy than conventional sources. Microsc Microanal 14:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927608080288
Deagle RC, Wee TE, Brown CM (2017) Reproducibility in light microscopy: maintenance, standards and SOPs. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 89:120–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2017.06.008
Jonkman J, Brown CM, Cole RW (2014) Quantitative confocal microscopy: beyond a pretty picture. Methods Cell Biol 123:113–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420138-5.00007-0
Kim JK, Schubert EF (2008) Transcending the replacement paradigm of solid-state lighting. Opt Express 16:21835–21842
Lee JY, Kitaoka M (2018) A beginner’s guide to rigor and reproducibility in fluorescence imaging experiments. Mol Biol Cell 29:1519–1525. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E17-05-0276
Lichtman JW, Conchello JA (2005) Fluorescence microscopy. Nat Methods 2:910–919. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth817
Liu E, Nolan JP (2012) Light emitting diodes: light engines to simplify and economize advanced microscopy. Cytometry A 81:185–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22006
Mubaid F, Brown CM (2017) Less is more: longer exposure times with low light intensity is less photo-toxic. Microsc Today 25:26–35
Sato T, Murthy VN (2012) Light-emitting diodes for biological microscopy. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.top072306 2012
Tinning PW, Franssen A, Hridi SU, Bushell TJ, McConnell G (2018) A 340/380 nm light-emitting diode illuminator for Fura-2 AM ratiometric Ca(2+) imaging of live cells with better than 5 nM precision. J Microsc 269:212–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12616
Vakili A, Xiong DX, Rajadhyaksha M, DiMarzio CA (2015) High brightness LED in confocal microscopy. Three-dimensional and multidimensional microscopy: image acquisition and processing. XXII:933006. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2078191
Waters JC (2009) Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. J Cell Biol 185:1135–1148. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200903097
Webb DJ, Brown CM (2013) Epi-fluorescence microscopy. Methods Mol Biol 931:29–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-056-4_2
Wessels JT, Pliquett U, Wouters FS (2012) Light-emitting diodes in modern microscopy—from David to Goliath? Cytometry A 81:188–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22023
Acknowledgements
All experiments were conducted at the McGill University Advanced BioImaging Facility (ABIF).
Funding
Funding for this project came from the National Sciences and Engineering Research Councils (NSERC) Grant 386084, the McGill Sustainability Fund project SP0149 and the Advanced BioImaging Facility (ABIF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mubaid, F., Kaufman, D., Wee, TL. et al. Fluorescence microscope light source stability. Histochem Cell Biol 151, 357–366 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-019-01776-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-019-01776-6