Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ChatGPT and scientific abstract writing: pitfalls and caution

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ali MJ, Djalilian A (2023) Readership awareness series—paper 4: Chatbots and ChatGPT—ethical considerations in scientific publications. Semin Ophthalmol [Epub]

  2. COPE position statement (2023) In: Authorship and AI tools. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author. [Accessed 17th March, 2023]

  3. van Dis EAM, Bollen J, Zuidema W, van Rooij R, Bockting CL (2023) ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature 614(7947):224–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ali MJ (2023) ChatGPT and lacrimal drainage disorders: performance and scope of improvement. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 39(3):221–225

  5. Singh S, Djalilian A, Ali MJ (2023) ChatGPT and ophthalmology: exploring its potential with discharge summaries and operative notes. Semin Ophthalmol pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2023.2209166

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Govindram Seksaria Institute of Dacryology, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Road no 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, -34, India

    Mohammad Javed Ali

  2. Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Service, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India

    Swati Singh

Authors
  1. Mohammad Javed Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Swati Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Javed Ali.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, M.J., Singh, S. ChatGPT and scientific abstract writing: pitfalls and caution. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 261, 3205–3206 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06123-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06123-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation