Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence, causes and associations of amblyopia in year 1 students in Central China

The Anyang childhood eye study (ACES)

  • Pediatrics
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Earlier diagnosis and treatment of amblyopia are associated with improved visual outcomes. This study reports the prevalence of amblyopia and associated factors in year 1 primary school students in central China.

Methods

The school-based, cross-sectional study involved 3,112 year 1 primary school students . All the participants underwent a comprehensive eye examinations including cycloplegic refraction, cover test and ocular movement examinations. The unaided and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded. Unilateral amblyopia was defined as a 2-line interocular difference with BCVA ≤ 20/32 (≥ logMar 0.2) in the worse eye and with coexisting anisometropia (≥ 1.00 D SE for hyperopia, ≥ 3.00 D SE for myopia, or ≥ 1.50 D for astigmatism), strabismus or past or present visual axis obstruction. Bilateral amblyopia was defined as BCVA in both eyes<20/40 (> logMar 0.3), with coexisting hyperopia ≥ 4 D SE, myopia ≤ −6 D SE, or astigmatism ≥ 2.5 D, or past or present visual axis obstruction.

Results

Out of the 3,112 eligible students, 2,893 (93.0 %) students completed the examinations. The average age of the students was 7.1 ± 0.4 (mean ± standard deviation SD) years old. The prevalence of amblyopia was 1.0 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.6 %–1.3 %) with no difference between the sexes (P = 0.88). Of the 27 amblyopic students, unilateral amblyopia was found in 18 (66.7 %) students, and bilateral amblyopia in 9 (33.3 %) students. Of 18 unilateral amblyopia, 13 were anisometropic amblyopia, 4 were strabismus amblyopia, 1 was mixed amblyopia. Of 9 bilateral amblyopia, 7 were isoametropic amblyopia, 2 were stimulus deprivation. The mean corrected VA of the amblyopic eyes was 30.50 logMAR letters (Snellen VA equivalent 4/12.6), and the range was 5 to 45 logMAR letters (Snellen VA equivalent 4/40-4/6.3). Most amblyopic eyes (38.9 %) were significantly hyperopic (spherical equivalent ≥ +3.00 D); 25.0 % were myopic. In addition, 58 (2.1 %) students had a previous amblyopia history of amblyopia that was not corroborated in this study.

Conclusions

The study shows a relatively low prevalence of amblyopia (1.0 %) in year 1 students in central China. Amblyopia is usually caused by abnormal refractive error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2002) A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 120:268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Attebo K, Mitchell P, Cumming R, Smith W, Jolly N, Sparkes R (1998) Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population. Ophthalmology 105:154–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Simons K (1996) Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome. Surv Ophthalmol 41:3–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rahi J, Logan S, Timms C, Russell-Eggitt I, Taylor D (2002) Risk, causes, and outcomes of visual impairment after loss of vision in the non-amblyopic eye: a population-based study. Lancet 360:597–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jakobsson P, Kvarnstrom G, Abrahamsson M, Bjernbrink-Hornblad E, Sunnqvist B (2002) The frequency of amblyopia among visually impaired persons. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 80:44–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlton J, Karnon J, Czoski-Murray C, Smith KJ, Marr J (2008) The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes for amblyopia and strabismus in children up to the age of 4–5 years: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 12:1–194

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart CE, Fielder AR, Stephens DA, Moseley MJ (2005) Treatment of unilateral amblyopia: factors influencing visual outcome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:3152–3160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM, Harvey I (2003) Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol 87:988–993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. He M, Zeng J, Liu Y, Xu J, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB (2004) Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern china. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:793–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao J, Pan X, Sui R, Munoz SR, Sperduto RD, Ellwein LB (2000) Refractive Error Study in Children: results from Shunyi District, China. Am J Ophthalmol 129:427–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu P, Chen X, Zhang W, Chen S, Shu L (2008) Prevalence of ocular disease in Tibetan primary school children. Can J Ophthalmol 43:95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pi LH, Chen L, Liu Q, Ke N, Fang J, Zhang S, Xiao J, Ye WJ, Xiong Y, Shi H, Zhou XY, Yin ZQ (2012) Prevalence of eye diseases and causes of visual impairment in school-aged children in Western China. J Epidemiol 22:37–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Robaei D, Rose KA, Ojaimi E, Kifley A, Martin FJ, Mitchell P (2006) Causes and associations of amblyopia in a population-based sample of 6-year-old Australian children. Arch Ophthalmol 124:878–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kvarnstrom G, Jakobsson P, Lennerstrand G (2001) Visual screening of Swedish children: an ophthalmological evaluation. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79:240–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kvarnstrom G, Jakobsson P, Lennerstrand G (1998) Screening for visual and ocular disorders in children, evaluation of the system in Sweden. Acta Paediatr 87:1173–1179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group (2008) Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African American and Hispanic children ages 6 to 72 months the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology 115:1229.e1–1236.e1

    Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman DS, Repka MX, Katz J, Giordano L, Ibironke J, Hawse P, Tielsch JM (2009) Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in white and African American children aged 6 through 71 months the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 116(11):2121.e1-2–2122.e1-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chia A, Dirani M, Chan YH, Gazzard G, Au Eong KG, Selvaraj P, Ling Y, Quah BL, Young TL, Mitchell P, Varma R, Wong TY, Saw SM (2010) Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in young singaporean chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:3411–3417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Robaei D, Kifley A, Rose KA, Mitchell P (2008) Impact of amblyopia on vision at age 12 years: findings from a population-based study. Eye (Lond) 22:496–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ohlsson J, Villarreal G, Sjostrom A, Abrahamsson M, Sjostrand J (2001) Visual acuity, residual amblyopia and ocular pathology in a screened population of 12–13-year-old children in Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79:589–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ohlsson J, Villarreal G, Sjostrom A, Cavazos H, Abrahamsson M, Sjostrand J (2003) Visual acuity, amblyopia, and ocular pathology in 12- to 13-year-old children in Northern Mexico. J AAPOS 7:47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Preslan MW, Novak A (1996) Baltimore Vision Screening Project. Ophthalmology 103:105–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsuo T, Matsuo C (2007) Comparison of prevalence rates of strabismus and amblyopia in Japanese elementary school children between the years 2003 and 2005. Acta Med Okayama 61:329–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsuo T, Matsuo C, Matsuoka H, Kio K (2007) Detection of strabismus and amblyopia in 1.5- and 3-year-old children by a preschool vision-screening program in Japan. Acta Med Okayama 61:9–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liang YB, Friedman DS, Wong TY, Wang FH, Duan XR, Yang XH, Zhou Q, Tao Q, Zhan SY, Sun LP, Wang NL (2009) Rationale, design, methodology, and baseline data of a population-based study in rural China: the Handan Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 16:115–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D (1997) Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 74:367–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ojaimi E, Rose KA, Smith W, Morgan IG, Martin FJ, Mitchell P (2005) Methods for a population-based study of myopia and other eye conditions in school children: the Sydney Myopia Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 12:59–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Robaei D, Rose KA, Kifley A, Cosstick M, Ip JM, Mitchell P (2006) Factors associated with childhood strabismus: findings from a population-based study. Ophthalmology 113:1146–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Varma R, Deneen J, Cotter S, Paz SH, Azen SP, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Zhao P (2006) The multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study: design and methods. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 13:253–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams C, Northstone K, Howard M, Harvey I, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM (2008) Prevalence and risk factors for common vision problems in children: data from the ALSPAC study. Br J Ophthalmol 92:959–964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Newman DK, Hitchcock A, McCarthy H, Keast-Butler J, Moore AT (1996) Preschool vision screening: outcome of children referred to the hospital eye service. Br J Ophthalmol 80:1077–1082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Burtolo C, Ciurlo C, Polizzi A, Lantier PB, Calabria G (2002) Echobiometric study of ocular growth in patients with amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 39:209–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith EL 3rd, Hung LF, Harwerth RS (1999) Developmental visual system anomalies and the limits of emmetropization. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 19:90–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Abrahamsson M, Fabian G, Andersson AK, Sjostrand J (1990) A longitudinal study of a population based sample of astigmatic children. I. Refraction and amblyopia. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 68:428–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Abrahamsson M, Fabian G, Sjostrand J (1990) A longitudinal study of a population based sample of astigmatic children. II. The changeability of anisometropia. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 68:435–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The ACES was supported by the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (“973” Program, 2011CB504601) of the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project (81120108007) of the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors thank the support they received from the Anyang city government in helping organize the survey.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ning Li Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fu, J., Li, S.M., Li, S.Y. et al. Prevalence, causes and associations of amblyopia in year 1 students in Central China. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252, 137–143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2451-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2451-z

Keywords

Navigation